Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Re: Are Free Online Storage Sites Safe?

  1. #11
    Bear Guest

    Re: Are Free Online Storage Sites Safe?

    Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    news:k455cr$ivb$5@dont-email.me:

    > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:53:18 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:
    >
    >> From: "David_B" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    >>
    >>>>> Thanks for answering.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I already have Acronis TI. It has saved my butt many, many times
    >>>>> over the years. What I'm looking for now is somewhere to put off
    >>>>> site a few important files I want to keep secret. I also would like
    >>>>> them to be able to access them from any computer.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> If my house, garage and outbuildings burned down, or Obama bombs
    >>>>> them because I won't let him have my guns, I'd like to have these
    >>>>> files safe.
    >>>>
    >>>> You can ignore this troll. He doesn't understand the concepts of
    >>>> what you brought up. As you can see, his answer was a red-herring.
    >>>
    >>> You are wrong yet again, Mr Lipman.
    >>>
    >>> Perhaps you should explain to the OP that you were sacked by
    >>> Malwarebytes because of your ....... ummm ...... incompetence?
    >>>
    >>> Will you do that?

    >>
    >> ******* - I resigned. You have nothing to the contrary because it is a
    >> non existent event. Get that into your crud laden noggen.
    >>
    >> As I stated before, I still have the formal resignation letter. It is
    >> on record with Malwarebytes' counsel.
    >>
    >> Your a bloody troll and so you sling mud hoping it will stick.

    >
    > Typical lying, insinuation from the king of slime. What else do you
    > expect?
    >
    > Did you know that he's at present on the run from the UK police? He's
    > hiding out somewhere on the 2000-plus miles of inland waterways in his
    > narrowboat, constantly on the move. Both Cheshire and Devon & Cornwall
    > police wish to question him about threats to kill.


    Aardie, do you think you might be exaggerating?

    You are making imaginary false accusations. This is the story so far....

    Bad guy (Aardvark) wants to cause harmless guy (David) as much trouble as
    possible. Bad guy seizes on a figure of speech used in a post by harmless
    guy and visits police feigning fear for his and his family's life.

    Bad guy is careful not to file formal report in case police arrest him for
    wasting their time for his hoax. Police officer doesn't understand Usenet
    but is not persuaded there is any threat and takes no further action. So
    bad guy cooks up scheme to get others to pass message to harmless guy
    demanding harmless guy contact the police. Harmless guy too smart to fall
    for that trick.

    Contents of bad guy's message get posted. Others (G.Morgan and Dustin)
    advise bad guy he caused his own problems by revealing police details in
    his message and tried to convey it in a crazy way. Bad guy admits his
    attempt was stupid.

    Previously, bad guy received email from police and showed it to others
    (FTR and G.Morgan) who notice headers reveal internal police servers. Bad
    guy not willing to inform police of security breaches in the email.

    Whenever bad guy loses heart his moll (SeaNymph) shrieks encouragement
    that he's doing the right thing. To prevent loss of face, bad guy
    presently continues to make louder but meaningless threats of trouble for
    harmless guy.

    Harmless guy moves on with his life and feels happy. Bad guy and moll left
    spitting with rage because their nasty scheme got foiled. Bad guy unable
    to lose face on account of something he misjudged so he steps up his hate
    campaign.

    (....more later...)

    Jax
    --
    Bear Bottoms
    http://bearware.info

  2. #12
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: Are Free Online Storage Sites Safe?

    On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:57:50 +0100, BD Lite wrote:

    > Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    > news:k455cr$ivb$5@dont-email.me:
    >
    >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:53:18 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:
    >>
    >>> From: "David_B" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    >>>
    >>>>>> Thanks for answering.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> I already have Acronis TI. It has saved my butt many, many times
    >>>>>> over the years. What I'm looking for now is somewhere to put off
    >>>>>> site a few important files I want to keep secret. I also would
    >>>>>> like them to be able to access them from any computer.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> If my house, garage and outbuildings burned down, or Obama bombs
    >>>>>> them because I won't let him have my guns, I'd like to have these
    >>>>>> files safe.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> You can ignore this troll. He doesn't understand the concepts of
    >>>>> what you brought up. As you can see, his answer was a red-herring.
    >>>>
    >>>> You are wrong yet again, Mr Lipman.
    >>>>
    >>>> Perhaps you should explain to the OP that you were sacked by
    >>>> Malwarebytes because of your ....... ummm ...... incompetence?
    >>>>
    >>>> Will you do that?
    >>>
    >>> ******* - I resigned. You have nothing to the contrary because it is
    >>> a non existent event. Get that into your crud laden noggen.
    >>>
    >>> As I stated before, I still have the formal resignation letter. It is
    >>> on record with Malwarebytes' counsel.
    >>>
    >>> Your a bloody troll and so you sling mud hoping it will stick.

    >>
    >> Typical lying, insinuation from the king of slime. What else do you
    >> expect?
    >>
    >> Did you know that he's at present on the run from the UK police? He's
    >> hiding out somewhere on the 2000-plus miles of inland waterways in his
    >> narrowboat, constantly on the move. Both Cheshire and Devon & Cornwall
    >> police wish to question him about threats to kill.

    >
    > Aardie, do you think you might be exaggerating?
    >
    > <SNIP BASELESS, FABRICATED BULL****>


    Nope.


    --
    "Compassion is not weakness, and concern for the unfortunate is not
    socialism." Hubert H. Humphrey

  3. #13
    Dustin Guest

    Re: Are Free Online Storage Sites Safe?

    Bear <removebear.bottoms1@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:XnsA0DDAC90DFDDCbearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225. 254.104:

    > (....more later...)


    Not necessary. The lengthy post you already provided contains many factual
    errors and misleading sentences. I'm of the opinion it's intentional.
    Along the lines of national inquirer style reporting.

    I really expect nothing better from you. Since you arrived you've engaged
    in conversations you really have no knowledge of, and attacked people you
    don't even know.

    Your trolling abilities aren't all that impressive either.

    Just my 2 cents.




    --
    There ain't no rest for the wicked. Money don't grow on trees. I got bills
    to pay. I got mouths to feed. Ain't nothing in this world for free. Oh No.
    I can't slow down, I can't hold back though you know I wish I could. Oh no
    there ain't no rest for the wicked, until we close our eyes for good.




  4. #14
    Bear Guest

    Re: Are Free Online Storage Sites Safe?

    Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    news:k47aqg$it1$2@dont-email.me:

    > On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:57:50 +0100, BD Lite wrote:
    >
    >> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    >> news:k455cr$ivb$5@dont-email.me:
    >>
    >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:53:18 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> From: "David_B" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    >>>>
    >>>>>>> Thanks for answering.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> I already have Acronis TI. It has saved my butt many, many times
    >>>>>>> over the years. What I'm looking for now is somewhere to put off
    >>>>>>> site a few important files I want to keep secret. I also would
    >>>>>>> like them to be able to access them from any computer.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> If my house, garage and outbuildings burned down, or Obama bombs
    >>>>>>> them because I won't let him have my guns, I'd like to have these
    >>>>>>> files safe.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> You can ignore this troll. He doesn't understand the concepts of
    >>>>>> what you brought up. As you can see, his answer was a red-herring.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> You are wrong yet again, Mr Lipman.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Perhaps you should explain to the OP that you were sacked by
    >>>>> Malwarebytes because of your ....... ummm ...... incompetence?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Will you do that?
    >>>>
    >>>> ******* - I resigned. You have nothing to the contrary because it is
    >>>> a non existent event. Get that into your crud laden noggen.
    >>>>
    >>>> As I stated before, I still have the formal resignation letter. It
    >>>> is on record with Malwarebytes' counsel.
    >>>>
    >>>> Your a bloody troll and so you sling mud hoping it will stick.
    >>>
    >>> Typical lying, insinuation from the king of slime. What else do you
    >>> expect?
    >>>
    >>> Did you know that he's at present on the run from the UK police? He's
    >>> hiding out somewhere on the 2000-plus miles of inland waterways in his
    >>> narrowboat, constantly on the move. Both Cheshire and Devon & Cornwall
    >>> police wish to question him about threats to kill.

    >>
    >> Aardie, do you think you might be exaggerating?
    >>
    >> You are making imaginary false accusations. This is the story so
    >> far....
    >>
    >> Bad guy (Aardvark) wants to cause harmless guy (David) as much trouble
    >> as possible. Bad guy seizes on a figure of speech used in a post by
    >> harmless guy and visits police feigning fear for his and his family's
    >> life.
    >>
    >> Bad guy is careful not to file formal report in case police arrest him
    >> for wasting their time for his hoax. Police officer doesn't understand
    >> Usenet but is not persuaded there is any threat and takes no further
    >> action. So bad guy cooks up scheme to get others to pass message to
    >> harmless guy demanding harmless guy contact the police. Harmless guy
    >> too smart to fall for that trick.
    >>
    >> Contents of bad guy's message get posted. Others (G.Morgan and Dustin)
    >> advise bad guy he caused his own problems by revealing police details
    >> in his message and tried to convey it in a crazy way. Bad guy admits
    >> his attempt was stupid.
    >>
    >> Previously, bad guy received email from police and showed it to others
    >> (FTR and G.Morgan) who notice headers reveal internal police servers.
    >> Bad guy not willing to inform police of security breaches in the email.
    >>
    >> Whenever bad guy loses heart his moll (SeaNymph) shrieks encouragement
    >> that he's doing the right thing. To prevent loss of face, bad guy
    >> presently continues to make louder but meaningless threats of trouble
    >> for harmless guy.
    >>
    >> Harmless guy moves on with his life and feels happy. Bad guy and moll
    >> left spitting with rage because their nasty scheme got foiled. Bad guy
    >> unable to lose face on account of something he misjudged so he steps up
    >> his hate campaign.
    >>
    >> (....more later...)

    >
    > Nope.


    Aardie you have been overstating your case by a mile.

    Jax
    --
    Bear Bottoms
    http://bearware.info

  5. #15
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: Are Free Online Storage Sites Safe?

    On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:45:21 +0100, BD Lite wrote:

    > Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    > news:k47aqg$it1$2@dont-email.me:
    >
    >> On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:57:50 +0100, BD Lite wrote:
    >>
    >>> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    >>> news:k455cr$ivb$5@dont-email.me:
    >>>
    >>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:53:18 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> From: "David_B" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Thanks for answering.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> I already have Acronis TI. It has saved my butt many, many times
    >>>>>>>> over the years. What I'm looking for now is somewhere to put off
    >>>>>>>> site a few important files I want to keep secret. I also would
    >>>>>>>> like them to be able to access them from any computer.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> If my house, garage and outbuildings burned down, or Obama bombs
    >>>>>>>> them because I won't let him have my guns, I'd like to have these
    >>>>>>>> files safe.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> You can ignore this troll. He doesn't understand the concepts of
    >>>>>>> what you brought up. As you can see, his answer was a
    >>>>>>> red-herring.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> You are wrong yet again, Mr Lipman.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Perhaps you should explain to the OP that you were sacked by
    >>>>>> Malwarebytes because of your ....... ummm ...... incompetence?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Will you do that?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ******* - I resigned. You have nothing to the contrary because it
    >>>>> is a non existent event. Get that into your crud laden noggen.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> As I stated before, I still have the formal resignation letter. It
    >>>>> is on record with Malwarebytes' counsel.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Your a bloody troll and so you sling mud hoping it will stick.
    >>>>
    >>>> Typical lying, insinuation from the king of slime. What else do you
    >>>> expect?
    >>>>
    >>>> Did you know that he's at present on the run from the UK police? He's
    >>>> hiding out somewhere on the 2000-plus miles of inland waterways in
    >>>> his narrowboat, constantly on the move. Both Cheshire and Devon &
    >>>> Cornwall police wish to question him about threats to kill.
    >>>
    >>> Aardie, do you think you might be exaggerating?
    >>>
    >>> <SNIP BASELESS, FABRICATED BULL****>

    >>
    >> Nope.

    >
    > Aardie you have been overstating your case by a mile.
    >
    >


    I've done nothing but supply simple, bare facts, Bear, you ****ing stupid
    trolling ****, and you know it. Facts, by their very ****ing intrinsic
    nature, can be neither exaggerated nor diminished.

    --
    "Compassion is not weakness, and concern for the unfortunate is not
    socialism." Hubert H. Humphrey

  6. #16
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: Are Free Online Storage Sites Safe?

    On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 04:56:42 +0000, Dustin wrote:

    > Bear <removebear.bottoms1@gmail.com> wrote in
    > news:XnsA0DDAC90DFDDCbearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225. 254.104:
    >
    >> (....more later...)

    >
    > Not necessary. The lengthy post you already provided contains many
    > factual errors and misleading sentences.


    'Contains many', Dustin? I would have said 'is nothing but'.

    > I'm of the opinion it's
    > intentional. Along the lines of national inquirer style reporting.


    Whatever bull**** the Beartroll comes out with, I know the truth of the
    matter and whatever hopeful fantasies it has, the police *do* wish to
    speak to the boater **** about an on-line threat he made and therefore
    *will* be speaking to him about it however long it takes for them to find
    him.

    >
    > I really expect nothing better from you.


    Heh. State the bleedin' obvious, why don't you? :-)

    > Since you arrived you've
    > engaged in conversations you really have no knowledge of, and attacked
    > people you don't even know.
    >


    It began with an unwarranted insult and it's been all downhill ever
    since. Did you know that the unwarranted insult was as a result of the
    Beartroll misattributing to me something the boater **** had written?
    Which prolific and unwanted poster does that remind you of?

    > Your trolling abilities aren't all that impressive either.
    >


    Laughably transparent, in fact. Except, it seems, to the Grumple Gang,
    especially its leader, Ricky Rhubarb.

    > Just my 2 cents.


    Worth much, much more, IMO.



    --
    "Compassion is not weakness, and concern for the unfortunate is not
    socialism." Hubert H. Humphrey

  7. #17
    Bear Guest

    Re: Are Free Online Storage Sites Safe?

    Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    news:k49qrl$d1o$1@dont-email.me:

    > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:45:21 +0100, BD Lite wrote:
    >
    >> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    >> news:k47aqg$it1$2@dont-email.me:
    >>
    >>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:57:50 +0100, BD Lite wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    >>>> news:k455cr$ivb$5@dont-email.me:
    >>>>
    >>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:53:18 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> From: "David_B" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> Thanks for answering.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> I already have Acronis TI. It has saved my butt many, many
    >>>>>>>>> times over the years. What I'm looking for now is somewhere to
    >>>>>>>>> put off site a few important files I want to keep secret. I
    >>>>>>>>> also would like them to be able to access them from any
    >>>>>>>>> computer.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> If my house, garage and outbuildings burned down, or Obama bombs
    >>>>>>>>> them because I won't let him have my guns, I'd like to have
    >>>>>>>>> these files safe.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> You can ignore this troll. He doesn't understand the concepts of
    >>>>>>>> what you brought up. As you can see, his answer was a
    >>>>>>>> red-herring.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> You are wrong yet again, Mr Lipman.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Perhaps you should explain to the OP that you were sacked by
    >>>>>>> Malwarebytes because of your ....... ummm ...... incompetence?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Will you do that?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> ******* - I resigned. You have nothing to the contrary because it
    >>>>>> is a non existent event. Get that into your crud laden noggen.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> As I stated before, I still have the formal resignation letter. It
    >>>>>> is on record with Malwarebytes' counsel.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Your a bloody troll and so you sling mud hoping it will stick.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Typical lying, insinuation from the king of slime. What else do you
    >>>>> expect?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Did you know that he's at present on the run from the UK police?
    >>>>> He's hiding out somewhere on the 2000-plus miles of inland waterways
    >>>>> in his narrowboat, constantly on the move. Both Cheshire and Devon &
    >>>>> Cornwall police wish to question him about threats to kill.
    >>>>
    >>>> Aardie, do you think you might be exaggerating?
    >>>>
    >>>> You are making imaginary false accusations. This is the story so
    >>>> far....
    >>>>
    >>>> Bad guy (Aardvark) wants to cause harmless guy (David) as much
    >>>> trouble as possible. Bad guy seizes on a figure of speech used in a
    >>>> post by harmless guy and visits police feigning fear for his and his
    >>>> family's life.
    >>>>
    >>>> Bad guy is careful not to file formal report in case police arrest
    >>>> him for wasting their time for his hoax. Police officer doesn't
    >>>> understand Usenet but is not persuaded there is any threat and takes
    >>>> no further action. So bad guy cooks up scheme to get others to pass
    >>>> message to harmless guy demanding harmless guy contact the police.
    >>>> Harmless guy too smart to fall for that trick.
    >>>>
    >>>> Contents of bad guy's message get posted. Others (G.Morgan and
    >>>> Dustin) advise bad guy he caused his own problems by revealing police
    >>>> details in his message and tried to convey it in a crazy way. Bad guy
    >>>> admits his attempt was stupid.
    >>>>
    >>>> Previously, bad guy received email from police and showed it to
    >>>> others (FTR and G.Morgan) who notice headers reveal internal police
    >>>> servers. Bad guy not willing to inform police of security breaches in
    >>>> the email.
    >>>>
    >>>> Whenever bad guy loses heart his moll (SeaNymph) shrieks
    >>>> encouragement that he's doing the right thing. To prevent loss of
    >>>> face, bad guy presently continues to make louder but meaningless
    >>>> threats of trouble for harmless guy.
    >>>>
    >>>> Harmless guy moves on with his life and feels happy. Bad guy and moll
    >>>> left spitting with rage because their nasty scheme got foiled. Bad
    >>>> guy unable to lose face on account of something he misjudged so he
    >>>> steps up his hate campaign.
    >>>>
    >>>> (....more later...)

    >
    >>>> Aardie, do you think you might be exaggerating?
    >>>>
    >>>> You are making imaginary false accusations. This is the story so
    >>>> far....
    >>>>
    >>>> Bad guy (Aardvark) wants to cause harmless guy (David) as much
    >>>> trouble as possible. Bad guy seizes on a figure of speech used in a
    >>>> post by harmless guy and visits police feigning fear for his and his
    >>>> family's life.
    >>>>
    >>>> Bad guy is careful not to file formal report in case police arrest
    >>>> him for wasting their time for his hoax. Police officer doesn't
    >>>> understand Usenet but is not persuaded there is any threat and takes
    >>>> no further action. So bad guy cooks up scheme to get others to pass
    >>>> message to harmless guy demanding harmless guy contact the police.
    >>>> Harmless guy too smart to fall for that trick.
    >>>>
    >>>> Contents of bad guy's message get posted. Others (G.Morgan and
    >>>> Dustin) advise bad guy he caused his own problems by revealing police
    >>>> details in his message and tried to convey it in a crazy way. Bad guy
    >>>> admits his attempt was stupid.
    >>>>
    >>>> Previously, bad guy received email from police and showed it to
    >>>> others (FTR and G.Morgan) who notice headers reveal internal police
    >>>> servers. Bad guy not willing to inform police of security breaches in
    >>>> the email.
    >>>>
    >>>> Whenever bad guy loses heart his moll (SeaNymph) shrieks
    >>>> encouragement that he's doing the right thing. To prevent loss of
    >>>> face, bad guy presently continues to make louder but meaningless
    >>>> threats of trouble for harmless guy.
    >>>>
    >>>> Harmless guy moves on with his life and feels happy. Bad guy and moll
    >>>> left spitting with rage because their nasty scheme got foiled. Bad
    >>>> guy unable to lose face on account of something he misjudged so he
    >>>> steps up his hate campaign.
    >>>>
    >>>> (....more later...)
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Nope.

    >>
    >> Aardie you have been overstating your case by a mile.
    >>

    >
    > I've done nothing but supply simple, bare facts, Bear, you ****ing
    > stupid trolling ****, and you know it. Facts, by their very ****ing
    > intrinsic nature, can be neither exaggerated nor diminished.


    So exactly what's wrong with the story so far?....

    Bad guy (Aardvark) wants to cause harmless guy (David) as much trouble as
    possible. Bad guy seizes on a figure of speech used in a post by harmless
    guy and visits police feigning fear for his and his family's life.

    Bad guy is careful not to file formal report in case police arrest him for
    wasting their time for his hoax. Police officer doesn't understand Usenet
    but is not persuaded there is any threat and takes no further action. So
    bad guy cooks up scheme to get others to pass message to harmless guy
    demanding harmless guy contact the police. Harmless guy too smart to fall
    for that trick.

    Contents of bad guy's message get posted. Others (G.Morgan and Dustin)
    advise bad guy he caused his own problems by revealing police details in
    his message and tried to convey it in a crazy way. Bad guy admits his
    attempt was stupid.

    Previously, bad guy received email from police and showed it to others
    (FTR and G.Morgan) who notice headers reveal internal police servers. Bad
    guy not willing to inform police of security breaches in the email.

    Whenever bad guy loses heart his moll (SeaNymph) shrieks encouragement
    that he's doing the right thing. To prevent loss of face, bad guy
    presently continues to make louder but meaningless threats of trouble for
    harmless guy.

    Harmless guy moves on with his life and feels happy. Bad guy and moll left
    spitting with rage because their nasty scheme got foiled. Bad guy unable
    to lose face on account of something he misjudged so he steps up his hate
    campaign.

    (....more later...)

    Jax
    --
    Bear Bottoms
    http://bearware.info

  8. #18
    Aardvark Guest

    Re: Are Free Online Storage Sites Safe?

    On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:42:05 +0100, BD Lite wrote:

    > Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    > news:k49qrl$d1o$1@dont-email.me:
    >
    >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:45:21 +0100, BD Lite wrote:
    >>
    >>> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    >>> news:k47aqg$it1$2@dont-email.me:
    >>>
    >>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:57:50 +0100, BD Lite wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
    >>>>> news:k455cr$ivb$5@dont-email.me:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:53:18 -0400, David H. Lipman wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> From: "David_B" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for answering.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> I already have Acronis TI. It has saved my butt many, many
    >>>>>>>>>> times over the years. What I'm looking for now is somewhere to
    >>>>>>>>>> put off site a few important files I want to keep secret. I
    >>>>>>>>>> also would like them to be able to access them from any
    >>>>>>>>>> computer.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> If my house, garage and outbuildings burned down, or Obama
    >>>>>>>>>> bombs them because I won't let him have my guns, I'd like to
    >>>>>>>>>> have these files safe.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> You can ignore this troll. He doesn't understand the concepts
    >>>>>>>>> of what you brought up. As you can see, his answer was a
    >>>>>>>>> red-herring.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> You are wrong yet again, Mr Lipman.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Perhaps you should explain to the OP that you were sacked by
    >>>>>>>> Malwarebytes because of your ....... ummm ...... incompetence?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Will you do that?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> ******* - I resigned. You have nothing to the contrary because it
    >>>>>>> is a non existent event. Get that into your crud laden noggen.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> As I stated before, I still have the formal resignation letter.
    >>>>>>> It is on record with Malwarebytes' counsel.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Your a bloody troll and so you sling mud hoping it will stick.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Typical lying, insinuation from the king of slime. What else do you
    >>>>>> expect?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Did you know that he's at present on the run from the UK police?
    >>>>>> He's hiding out somewhere on the 2000-plus miles of inland
    >>>>>> waterways in his narrowboat, constantly on the move. Both Cheshire
    >>>>>> and Devon &
    >>>>>> Cornwall police wish to question him about threats to kill.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Aardie, do you think you might be exaggerating?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> <SNIP BASELESS, FABRICATED BULL****>
    >>>>
    >>>> Nope.
    >>>
    >>> Aardie you have been overstating your case by a mile.
    >>>
    >>>

    >> I've done nothing but supply simple, bare facts, Bear, you ****ing
    >> stupid trolling ****, and you know it. Facts, by their very ****ing
    >> intrinsic nature, can be neither exaggerated nor diminished.

    >
    > So exactly what's wrong with the story so far?....
    >
    > <SNIP BASELESS, FABRICATED BULL**** AGAIN>


    Your imaginary version? Everything, Bear, you stupid ****, as you well
    know.

    Now **** off, you trolling ****. You've become predictably boring.


    --
    "Compassion is not weakness, and concern for the unfortunate is not
    socialism." Hubert H. Humphrey

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •