Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Ping Dustin about MBAM

  1. #1
    Buffalo Guest

    Ping Dustin about MBAM

    I am runnng MBAM pro and mbamservice.exe is consistently using aprox
    105,000kb of menory (while in real time protection mode).
    Mbamgui.exe is also using aprox 9,000kb.
    Together they are using aprox 114MB of ram.
    I am curently on a laptop with XP SP3 with 2GB of ram and a Core Duo 1.66
    GHz cpu.
    Isn't that much ram usage kinda overboard?
    Thanks,
    Buffalo
    PS: On this laptop, I am using MS SE for Anti-Virus.



  2. #2
    Dustin Guest

    Re: Ping Dustin about MBAM

    "Buffalo" <phoney@physco.invalid.net> wrote in
    news:k1m2nc$d5t$1@dont-email.me:

    > I am runnng MBAM pro and mbamservice.exe is consistently using aprox
    > 105,000kb of menory (while in real time protection mode).


    Sounds about right.

    > Mbamgui.exe is also using aprox 9,000kb.
    > Together they are using aprox 114MB of ram.


    I predict it'll consume more as the database continues to grow.

    > Isn't that much ram usage kinda overboard?


    C'mon... You know I can't answer that one. ;p



    --
    There ain't no rest for the wicked. Money don't grow on trees. I got bills
    to pay. I got mouths to feed. Ain't nothing in this world for free. Oh No.
    I can't slow down, I can't hold back though you know I wish I could. Oh no
    there ain't no rest for the wicked, until we close our eyes for good.




  3. #3
    Buffalo Guest

    Re: Ping Dustin about MBAM


    "Dustin" <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:XnsA0BED5931ADA4HHI2948AJD832@no...
    > "Buffalo" <phoney@physco.invalid.net> wrote in
    > news:k1m2nc$d5t$1@dont-email.me:
    >
    >> I am runnng MBAM pro and mbamservice.exe is consistently using aprox
    >> 105,000kb of menory (while in real time protection mode).

    >
    > Sounds about right.
    >
    >> Mbamgui.exe is also using aprox 9,000kb.
    >> Together they are using aprox 114MB of ram.

    >
    > I predict it'll consume more as the database continues to grow.
    >
    >> Isn't that much ram usage kinda overboard?

    >
    > C'mon... You know I can't answer that one. ;p


    Just checking
    Buffalo
    PS: SAS uses a hell of a lot less.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •