Re: Exposing Malnet Strategies and Best Practices for Threat Protection

[bugeater.duckfart]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <XnsA0B9F26EF5F7DHHI2948AJD832@no>
Dustin <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
edited junk
>
> To be fair to the hashing systems, changing the search ID once you know
> what the antivirus/antimalware app is hitting on accomplishes the same
> thing. Fact is, with HLL server side poly; life's a ***** for the
> researcher. As far as consistent hits with one search string, or a
> simple algorithm. While you might score thousands, the damn thing is
> likely able to generate hundreds of thousands if not outright millions
> of different samples.
>
>

This "dissertation" on hashing systems is a real f'kn joke coming from
some ****head who claims to have 'cracked' my PGP sig and -
=====================
Duck**** claimed:
"that damn pgp signature ****
in this case worked against the person. It's allowed me to identify a base
ISP as the source. I'll soon have the account holders name and addy, then
it's my turn for some real fun.
======================

Of course, when Duckfarts couldn't make good on his fraudulent brag,
he claimed my ISP wouldn't allow him the information.

Don't you dummy ****s get the message yet?

This Dustin Cook bugeating faggot jagoff is a TOTAL FRAUD!

That's why he doesn't venture out of groups used by f'kn dummies who
don't know a 'call' from a 'push'.

Every time his ego got away from him and he went into a *real*
programming group, he had to have his ass glued back on after leaving
it.

He's a TOTAL, F'KN FRAUD!
=========================

But - back now to where he 'cracked' my PGP sig. BWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! NOT!!!!!


https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=...th/rI5Y7lbasmw

or

http://************/cgcb4fb


Re: The Dustin Cooks Troll list
Other recipients:
"Hot-Text" <hot-text@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote in
news:201110240325.UTC.j82ls3$a75$1@tioat.net:

edited out absolute junk

>
> for there PGP Keys
> @ news.mixmin.net Newgroup: alt.anonymous.messages
> is there too!
>
> And you say I do not know how it Works
> LOOL
>

Probably why he/she has decided to play elsewhere. They're worried I've
really discovered that they didn't always do it properly. Yes, in case your
wondering; I *know* you ****ed up. I've known for sometime now...

Not you hot-text, but our remailing friend.. They didn't always use the
remailer chain like they should have... And, that damn pgp signature ****
in this case worked against the person. It's allowed me to identify a base
ISP as the source. I'll soon have the account holders name and addy, then
it's my turn for some real fun.


LOL!

Good work on your part Hot text.

(I guess Hot **** did the blow job right.)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: RAID [SLAM] Ver. 0.4.6 (RAID'S True I.Q.)
Comment: RAID [SLAM] Is a Dangerous Sociopathic Monster
Comment: KeyID: 0x2D53F7F5
Comment: Fingerprint: 869B 753C F27C EC0F C9ED 27C5 BE60 5370 2D53 F7F5

iQA/AwUBUDhqQL5gU3AtU/f1EQKFHQCeMY8d2/ft+lrznMfTYbL86YILbV0An0XR
eU8pwzWFFaGPK5JUn/oymAN3
=1mtJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Dustin]

bugeater.duckfart <nobody@slug.sluggish.net> wrote in
news:6d8b762c63495845b0bc5a89e20de09e@slug.slugish .net:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In article <XnsA0B9F26EF5F7DHHI2948AJD832@no>
> Dustin <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> edited junk
>>
>> To be fair to the hashing systems, changing the search ID once you
>> know what the antivirus/antimalware app is hitting on accomplishes
>> the same thing. Fact is, with HLL server side poly; life's a *****
>> for the researcher. As far as consistent hits with one search
>> string, or a simple algorithm. While you might score thousands, the
>> damn thing is likely able to generate hundreds of thousands if not
>> outright millions of different samples.
>>
>>
>
> This "dissertation" on hashing systems is a real f'kn joke coming
> from some ****head who claims to have 'cracked' my PGP sig and -

So you've got something specific I wrote that you're taking issue with
and have supporting evidence to back your position? No? It's okay, I
didn't really think so. I just felt like responding.


Btw,

Aren't you overdue for accusing me of hacking googles archives? I didn't
want rebecca snuffed. ;p Again, Rebecca wanted me snuffed out. Whatcha
think?

Oh, did you try compiling kmans "fixed" code yet? How'd it work out for
you? LOLz!


--
There ain't no rest for the wicked. Money don't grow on trees. I got
bills to pay. I got mouths to feed. Ain't nothing in this world for
free. Oh No. I can't slow down, I can't hold back though you know I wish
I could. Oh no there ain't no rest for the wicked, until we close our
eyes for good.