Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Re: K-Man tears apart a 2nd example of the Sociopath's coding "expertise"

  1. #1
    Anonymous Guest

    Re: K-Man tears apart a 2nd example of the Sociopath's coding "expertise"

    In article <XnsA0AED20A012BAHHI2948AJD832@no>
    Dustin <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > Anonymous <nobody@slug.slugish.net> wrote in
    > news:cbebb19c5c707cdb44c4042e7ed627dc@slug.slugish .net:
    >
    > > Another archived post of Raid [SLAM] aka Dustin
    > > <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com>
    > >
    > > K-Man takes apart Duckfart's BASIC code, showing that Duck****
    > > doesn't even know what he's doing in BASIC, plus points out the fact
    > > Duckfart doesn't know anything about codes he brags of knowing.

    >
    > Just so everyone knows. K-mans efforts to optimize my code resulted in the
    > asic compiler rejecting his code. He didn't understand the language. It's
    > very specific about some things...
    >


    He's LYING AGAIN!

    LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE!!

    See, this is why this ****-for-brains pretender stays out of
    programming groups where the true "Big Boys" hang. Every time over the
    years that this lying pretender has ventured into a group of real
    programmers, he has been handed his ass on the way out. He's a fraud.
    That's why he stays in these know-nothing groups filled with laymen
    and amateurs who 'think' they know programming. He can lie and lie and
    the amateurs really don't know enough to confront this lying ****,
    especially when he goes into other Web pages or books, pulling out
    coding examples that are beyond the amateurs and know-nothings of
    these 'social' type groups, while he flaunts the answers from the Web
    site or book page as his own.

    Haven't you learned yet - HE LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING!

    ALWAYS HAS.

    ALWAYS WILL.


  2. #2
    Dustin Guest

    Re: K-Man tears apart a 2nd example of the Sociopath's coding "expertise"

    Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote in
    news:49aca32955681b59a7594e12456b2955@remailer.par anoici.org:

    > In article <XnsA0AED20A012BAHHI2948AJD832@no>
    > Dustin <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Anonymous <nobody@slug.slugish.net> wrote in
    >> news:cbebb19c5c707cdb44c4042e7ed627dc@slug.slugish .net:
    >>
    >> > Another archived post of Raid [SLAM] aka Dustin
    >> > <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com>
    >> >
    >> > K-Man takes apart Duckfart's BASIC code, showing that Duck****
    >> > doesn't even know what he's doing in BASIC, plus points out the
    >> > fact Duckfart doesn't know anything about codes he brags of
    >> > knowing.

    >>
    >> Just so everyone knows. K-mans efforts to optimize my code resulted
    >> in the asic compiler rejecting his code. He didn't understand the
    >> language. It's very specific about some things...
    >>

    >

    You think so?

    You can grab a copy of asic right here:

    http://publish.uwo.ca/~jkiernan/asicinfo.htm

    Feel free to copy and paste my source code into the ide and compile it.

    Now, try copying the corrected! source by kman and compiling it.

    One will compile, one will fail with funny as all hell errors because he
    doesn't know ASIC syntax and made a poor assumption thinking it's really
    like basic. It's close, but not quite.

    > LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE!!


    Go ahead and do what I challenged above. ;p

    No lying on my part. Kmans "corrected" (read: improved upon my code)
    will not compile, it's not asic syntax. Mine was. His efforts to improve
    my code, broke it. Asic doesn't like multiple commands on the same line,
    and he didn't know that. [g]

    My code had each statement broken down in baby steps because thats the
    proper asic syntax. Kman made assumptions, and you know what they say
    about assumptions. [g] Wasn't poor coding on my part or lack of
    understanding how to program, I did; I followed asics syntax. Kman
    didn't. My code works, Kmans doesnt compile. [g]


    > Haven't you learned yet - HE LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING!


    See above. go ahead, I provided you a link to download asic. You and
    anyone else can try what I said and see for yourselves.



    --
    Things look bad from over here. Too much confusion and no solution.
    Everyone here knows your fear. Your out of touch and you try too much.
    Yesterdays glory will help us today. You wanna retire? Get outta the
    way. I ain't got much time. Young ones close behind. I can't wait in
    line.


  3. #3
    Timmy Guest

    Re: K-Man tears apart a 2nd example of the Sociopath's coding "expertise"

    Dustin wrote ...


    <snipped bollocks>


    Do us all a favour and stop responding to the ****wit.

    None of us give a flying **** about this gurly row.



  4. #4
    Dustin Guest

    Re: K-Man tears apart a 2nd example of the Sociopath's coding "expertise"

    Timmy <Timmy@to.ms> wrote in news:MPG.2a94c9ea3eeb7653989817
    @news.aioe.org:

    > Dustin wrote ...
    >
    >
    > <snipped bollocks>
    >
    >
    > Do us all a favour and stop responding to the ****wit.
    >
    > None of us give a flying **** about this gurly row.
    >
    >


    Gotcha.


    --
    You know there ain't no rest for the wicked. Money don't grow on trees. I
    got bills to pay. I got mouths to feed. Ain't nothing in this world for
    free. I can't slow down, I can't hold back though you know I wish I could.
    Oh no there ain't no rest for the wicked, until we close our eyes for
    good.




  5. #5
    Buffalo Guest

    Re: K-Man tears apart a 2nd example of the Sociopath's coding "expertise"


    "Timmy" <Timmy@to.ms> wrote in message
    news:MPG.2a94c9ea3eeb7653989817@news.aioe.org...
    > Dustin wrote ...
    >
    >
    > <snipped bollocks>
    >
    >
    > Do us all a favour and stop responding to the ****wit.
    >
    > None of us give a flying **** about this gurly row.


    I second that.
    Buffalo



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •