On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:09:14 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:

> Dustin wrote:
>> FromTheRafters<erratic@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>> news:jpqt74$m5e$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2012 09:30:08 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 20:21:15 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2012 21:26:44 +0000, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps SM does pre-rendering in newsgroups?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Possibly. I might try it in Konqueror and whatever other
>>>>>>>>> browsers I have installed here.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just tried it in both Konq and SM. Nothing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you can still open the page, could you check the source and
>>>>>>>> see if you can divine what might be amiss?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe it's something in:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <script type="text/javascript" src="setcookie.js"></script>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Possible but unlikely IMO, FTR. I enter sites with NoScript
>>>>>> running, so that shouldn't hold up loading.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <script type="text/javascript"
>>>>>>> src="http://analytics.aweber.com/js/awt_analytics.js?id=6HSL"></
>>>> script>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> NS would take care of that too, Shirley. I remember when aweber
>>>>>> sold autoresponders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It uses style sheets too, but that's pretty common practice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed. Somewhat of a mystery, thus far.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I run with scripting enabled, and sometimes those larger scripts
>>>>> (Fake AV come-ons) take a long time to load and execute - selectors
>>>>> take even longer.
>>>>
>>>> The thirty or so seconds I allowed should be enough, don't you think?
>>>> I actually went off to the kitchen to make a cuppa tea after clicking
>>>> the link once. Still hadn't loaded when I got back.
>>>>
>>> That's more time than I gave it. D
>>>
>>> I don't have a clue as to what might be causing you to not get that
>>> page. I only tried it in IE that once - maybe I'll try again and go
>>> for a cuppa coffee.
>>>
>>>
>> I just clicked the link again. It came up in under 10 seconds; whole
>> page. And this was done on a dual p3/800mhz (coppermine mated
>> processors). It's the slowest machine that's still online here.
>>
>> I'm not a gamer tho, so it still meets my needs.. Albeit a bit slow
>> these days. [g]
>>
> I tried it again with IE - in less than a second it was loaded.

Just clicked the link again. Rolled a ciggie, sparked it up. Looked at my
browser. Nothing.



--
"Tell me, truthfully, do *you* download music from The Pirate Bay for
your personal use and listening pleasure?"
Clever guy BD in post <gLidnTjP2tgGPy7SnZ2dnUVZ7qKdnZ2d@bt.com>