~BD~ wrote:
> Dustin wrote:
>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>> news:_PKdnczlycsrQOzSnZ2dnUVZ8tOdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>
>>> Pretty good today! http://i40.tinypic.com/2lvzbtd.jpg
>>
>> That link tells me you take "your system is certified clean with this
>> datafile" as gospel...
>
> You appear to be calling into question the integrity of the company who
> ran the scan.

It may appear that way to you, but that's not really it.

> http://sucuri.net/ Are you questioning the scan result?

The results are fine, but they don't even come close to addressing the
problem that you are encountering. IOW, the scan isn't asking the right
questions.

[...]