Feds shift DNSChanger cut-off deadline to July

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:EpadnQnHqbdxcu3SnZ2dnUVZ8lOdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Dustin wrote:
>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>> news:CdednfoBmNubRe3SnZ2dnUVZ7vidnZ2d@bt.com:
>>
>>
>>> And, FYI, http://i.imgur.com/IAElm.jpg :-P
>>
>> Too true... heh...I've had astounding chewings over my grammar.
>
> Hi Dustin
>
> I know. I hoped you'd find that funny! :-)
>

"Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

I know I probably should just keep my self silent..but, the urge is simply
too strong. So....

How's that been working out for you? [G]


--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:EpadnQnHqbdxcu3SnZ2dnUVZ8lOdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>> news:CdednfoBmNubRe3SnZ2dnUVZ7vidnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>> And, FYI, http://i.imgur.com/IAElm.jpg :-P
>>>
>>> Too true... heh...I've had astounding chewings over my grammar.
>>
>> Hi Dustin
>>
>> I know. I hoped you'd find that funny! :-)
>>
>
> "Do unto others as you would have them
> do unto you."
>
> I know I probably should just keep my self silent..but, the urge is simply
> too strong. So....
>
> How's that been working out for you? [G]

Pretty good today! http://i40.tinypic.com/2lvzbtd.jpg

I don't think you realise just how helpful our relationship has been,
Dustin. Thank you for all your help.

Have a great day :-)

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:_PKdnczlycsrQOzSnZ2dnUVZ8tOdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Pretty good today! http://i40.tinypic.com/2lvzbtd.jpg

That link tells me you take "your system is certified clean with this
datafile" as gospel...

Doesn't answer my question, but that's ok. it's entirely offtopic here
anyway.

> I don't think you realise just how helpful our relationship has been,
> Dustin. Thank you for all your help.

Heh. David, it'll have no effect trying to paint me as an associate to
draw fire away from you. They know me there already. We have no
relationship.

> Have a great day :-)

Do let me know what your efforts to contact the authorities did for you,
eh?




--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:_PKdnczlycsrQOzSnZ2dnUVZ8tOdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Pretty good today! http://i40.tinypic.com/2lvzbtd.jpg
>
> That link tells me you take "your system is certified clean with this
> datafile" as gospel...

You appear to be calling into question the integrity of the company who
ran the scan. http://sucuri.net/ Are you questioning the scan result?

> Doesn't answer my question, but that's ok. it's entirely offtopic here
> anyway.

You asked how things were going. I said good! :-)

>> I don't think you realise just how helpful our relationship has been,
>> Dustin. Thank you for all your help.
>
> Heh. David, it'll have no effect trying to paint me as an associate to
> draw fire away from you. They know me there already. We have no
> relationship.
>
>> Have a great day :-)
>
> Do let me know what your efforts to contact the authorities did for you,
> eh?

I sometimes wonder if you really are as bright as *you* think you are!

There was no *need* to contact the police. The picture of "G. Morgan"
was taken down before 9am. Surely you checked? Doh!

Have a good one, Dustin.

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Bullwinkle]

Told you, you would find an excuse to back down. You always do.


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:BoqdnTQQSJIWWe_SnZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> Do let me know what your efforts to contact the authorities did for you,
> eh?

I sometimes wonder if you really are as bright as *you* think you are!

There was no *need* to contact the police. The picture of "G. Morgan"
was taken down before 9am. Surely you checked? Doh!

[FromTheRafters]

~BD~ wrote:
> Dustin wrote:
>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>> news:_PKdnczlycsrQOzSnZ2dnUVZ8tOdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>
>>> Pretty good today! http://i40.tinypic.com/2lvzbtd.jpg
>>
>> That link tells me you take "your system is certified clean with this
>> datafile" as gospel...
>
> You appear to be calling into question the integrity of the company who
> ran the scan.

It may appear that way to you, but that's not really it.

> http://sucuri.net/ Are you questioning the scan result?

The results are fine, but they don't even come close to addressing the
problem that you are encountering. IOW, the scan isn't asking the right
questions.

[...]

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:BoqdnTQQSJIWWe_SnZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Dustin wrote:
>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>> news:_PKdnczlycsrQOzSnZ2dnUVZ8tOdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>
>>> Pretty good today! http://i40.tinypic.com/2lvzbtd.jpg
>>
>> That link tells me you take "your system is certified clean with
>> this datafile" as gospel...
>
> You appear to be calling into question the integrity of the company
> who ran the scan. http://sucuri.net/ Are you questioning the scan
> result?

Nope. I am correctly questioning your reading comprehension skills tho.

>> Doesn't answer my question, but that's ok. it's entirely offtopic
>> here anyway.
>
> You asked how things were going. I said good! :-)

Good? Having your details published online is good to you? Why the
threat against G. Morgan and the others over the FBI then? Seems you
blew a little gasket the other day.

> I sometimes wonder if you really are as bright as *you* think you
> are!

Far brighter than you will ever be. Not that it takes much effort
there...I'll make it easy for you. I understand how to use nmap, what's
more, I understand the readouts it provides. It's painfully obvious you
don't tho. Not only that, you can't even be arsed to read and understand
the damn documentation. Hell, somebody had to tell your stupid arse it
was free software in the first place.

So, enough with the efforts of talking down to me or any other reverse
sy bull****. I have the same skillsets the people you've already annoyed
do. Only difference, I won't takeover domains to have fun with you as
quickly as they have. You're a ****ing moron who's way out of his
league, hence your blowup recently and hollow threats of involving the
FBI.


> There was no *need* to contact the police. The picture of "G. Morgan"
> was taken down before 9am. Surely you checked? Doh!

Why would I check your domain, David? So I too can be accused of 0wning
you? I don't think so. Fact is, you pissed yourself and made a
completely hollow threat of involving the FBI to determine who "hacked"
your domain. You *still* don't understand how it was done. Hell, you
didnt even know to proxy register your domain. Now, everybody you've
ever pissed off knows where you live and your landline tele numbers.

When I think of a stupid ****er David, your the first visual image which
comes to mind.

> Have a good one, Dustin.

You too Dave. I can't wait to see you poke alt.2600 with another stick
so they can stick your head on it.





--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

[Dustin]

FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:jkusnu$b1t$1@dont-email.me:

> ~BD~ wrote:
>> Dustin wrote:
>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>> news:_PKdnczlycsrQOzSnZ2dnUVZ8tOdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>
>>>> Pretty good today! http://i40.tinypic.com/2lvzbtd.jpg
>>>
>>> That link tells me you take "your system is certified clean with
>>> this datafile" as gospel...
>>
>> You appear to be calling into question the integrity of the company
>> who ran the scan.
>
> It may appear that way to you, but that's not really it.

He shouldn't be questioning others intelligence here. He should be
questioning his own lack of it.

> The results are fine, but they don't even come close to addressing
> the problem that you are encountering. IOW, the scan isn't asking the
> right questions.

Oh.. Wait for it. Along Dumbass dave will be to ask more questions in a
vein effort to learn to ask the right questions. As he fails to
comprehend the simplist of concepts, url redirects, nmap software
(seriously?), this surely went right over his poor little head.


--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by,
and the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:BoqdnTQQSJIWWe_SnZ2dnUVZ8vmdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>> news:_PKdnczlycsrQOzSnZ2dnUVZ8tOdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>
>>>> Pretty good today! http://i40.tinypic.com/2lvzbtd.jpg
>>>
>>> That link tells me you take "your system is certified clean with
>>> this datafile" as gospel...
>>
>> You appear to be calling into question the integrity of the company
>> who ran the scan. http://sucuri.net/ Are you questioning the scan
>> result?
>
> Nope. I am correctly questioning your reading comprehension skills tho.
>
>>> Doesn't answer my question, but that's ok. it's entirely offtopic
>>> here anyway.
>>
>> You asked how things were going. I said good! :-)
>
> Good? Having your details published online is good to you? Why the
> threat against G. Morgan and the others over the FBI then? Seems you
> blew a little gasket the other day.
>
>> I sometimes wonder if you really are as bright as *you* think you
>> are!
>
> Far brighter than you will ever be. Not that it takes much effort
> there...I'll make it easy for you. I understand how to use nmap, what's
> more, I understand the readouts it provides. It's painfully obvious you
> don't tho. Not only that, you can't even be arsed to read and understand
> the damn documentation. Hell, somebody had to tell your stupid arse it
> was free software in the first place.
>
> So, enough with the efforts of talking down to me or any other reverse
> sy bull****. I have the same skillsets the people you've already annoyed
> do. Only difference, I won't takeover domains to have fun with you as
> quickly as they have. You're a ****ing moron who's way out of his
> league, hence your blowup recently and hollow threats of involving the
> FBI.
>
>
>> There was no *need* to contact the police. The picture of "G. Morgan"
>> was taken down before 9am. Surely you checked? Doh!
>
> Why would I check your domain, David? So I too can be accused of 0wning
> you? I don't think so. Fact is, you pissed yourself and made a
> completely hollow threat of involving the FBI to determine who "hacked"
> your domain. You *still* don't understand how it was done. Hell, you
> didnt even know to proxy register your domain. Now, everybody you've
> ever pissed off knows where you live and your landline tele numbers.
>
> When I think of a stupid ****er David, your the first visual image which
> comes to mind.
>
>> Have a good one, Dustin.
>
> You too Dave. I can't wait to see you poke alt.2600 with another stick
> so they can stick your head on it.

There was *no* /hollow/ threat Dustin. It was a fact and for real! Real
enough for the 'bad guy' to take the picture down, that's for sure. :-)

One small favour. Please explain why there are two, separate,
destinations shown on this scan: http://i40.tinypic.com/2w3djqu.jpg

(I know that I am the piggy in the middle!)

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:76ednaDXLdIYi-7SnZ2dnUVZ8v-dnZ2d@bt.com:

> There was *no* /hollow/ threat Dustin. It was a fact and for real!
> Real enough for the 'bad guy' to take the picture down, that's for
> sure. :-)

No bad guy took any picture down for you. I'd wajor you contacted the web
host and had them park the page for you. I doubt you'd take the time to
learn what parking is or how to do it. I noticed the page parked last
night David. [g], your webhost won't find my IP anywhere. You're pissing
into the wind, David... Drenching yourself in the process.

Your threat is hollow because you haven't got a clue who (or how many) did
anything to your domain and the logs aren't going to help either. Even
script kiddies are usually smart enough to proxy out when diddling sites.
Proxy out lamah, means the IP the "WEBHOST" has isn't worth ****. It isn't
the IP of the computer which really did the deed.




--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts