On 3/19/2012 7:23 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>
>>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:14 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>> [....]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> This thread would have had value for newcomers until your ilk
>>>>>>> spoilt it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't spoil it. I was following it with interest and made *no*
>>>>>> comment until some other ****er tried to spoil it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BD certainly *isn't* my 'ilk', and I consider it insulting that you
>>>>>> lumped me together with him in any context.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your manner is putting people off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that I commented on someone trying to spoil the thread?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **** off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>
>>>>> You really are an arrogant Bar Steward.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>
>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.<shrug>
>>>>
>>>> He should apologize but not because you and your cult members say
>>>> so. If he has any character, such actions come naturally.
>>>
>>> Here's the deal- you apologise to me for accusing me of ruining a
>>> thread when I didn't, and then trying to tar me with the same ****ing
>>> brush as BD, and I'll consider apologising for reacting appropriately.
>>>
>>> Seems fair to me.
>>
>> You think Bear should apologize to you?? I think this is one of the
>> funniest things I've read on usenet in the last month!! LOL
>>
> You and your ilk would think that was funny.

I have an ilk? I must be important then!

--
Jenn