FromTheRafters wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:54:15 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> [....]
>>>>
>>>>> IAWTP
>>>>>
>>>>> Except for the part about apologizing for reacting to Bear's 'you and
>>>>> your ilk' remark. I really don't think an apology should be cheaply
>>>>> given away. It got me some punishment as a teen when I refused to
>>>>> apologize for something that I was not sorry that I had said. Life
>>>>> just isn't fair.D
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Things might have panned out differently had you, FTR, responded to
>>>> *my*
>>>> post to you! :-P
>>>>
>>> I'm curious, was it a post that I ignored, or one that I missed?
>>
>> The one that ****ed up what *had* been a very interesting thread in the
>> making.
>>
> Oh - I might have ignored it so that it wouldn't start an off topic
> subthread.
>
> ...how'd *that* work out?
>
You should know better by now! ;-)
--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."


D
Reply With Quote
