Feds shift DNSChanger cut-off deadline to July

[Aardvark]

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:31:59 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:

> Bear assessed Aardvark correctly in the blink of an eye.
>

Considering he was blaming me for something *you* did, ****, the
assessment certainly wasn't of me.

> Rednecks stand out in any crowd, whatever the country.

Huh? That a new sig or something?



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[FromTheRafters]

~BD~ wrote:
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> Jenn wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:14 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>>> [....]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This thread would have had value for newcomers until your ilk
>>>>>>>> spoilt it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't spoil it. I was following it with interest and made *no*
>>>>>>> comment until some other ****er tried to spoil it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BD certainly *isn't* my 'ilk', and I consider it insulting that you
>>>>>>> lumped me together with him in any context.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your manner is putting people off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fact that I commented on someone trying to spoil the thread?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **** off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really are an arrogant Bar Steward.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>>>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>>>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.<shrug>
>>>>>
>>>>> He should apologize but not because you and your cult members say
>>>>> so. If he has any character, such actions come naturally.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the deal- you apologise to me for accusing me of ruining a
>>>> thread when I didn't, and then trying to tar me with the same ****ing
>>>> brush as BD, and I'll consider apologising for reacting appropriately.
>>>>
>>>> Seems fair to me.
>>>
>>> You think Bear should apologize to you?? I think this is one of the
>>> funniest things I've read on usenet in the last month!! LOL
>>>
>> You and your ilk would think that was funny.
>
> Sometimes I really do wonder about you, FTR.
>
> Bear assessed Aardvark correctly in the blink of an eye.
>
> Rednecks stand out in any crowd, whatever the country.
>
*You* interrupted a thread in which many were participating and other
interested party's were lurking. Bear's irritation was because of that
hijacking of a good thread. Aardvark chastised you for doing so, and
Bear *incorrectly* chastised Aardvark for *your* behavior *and* lumped
Aardvark together with you (you're the "ilk" in his statement).

Aardvark may seem corrosive or abrasive, but he was *right* and Bear
should have apologized for lumping him in with you as a disruptive
influence.

I don't expect Bear to apologize, but a better man would.

That being said, I don't like Aarvark's constant abrasion. But on the
other hand - nobody said I had to like it. I understand his reasoning
for doing it.

[Jenn]

On 3/19/2012 5:42 PM, Dustin wrote:
> "Jenn"<me@noe.mail.com> wrote in news:jk87ei$4f5$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Dave is a good guy .. he's never done anything as long as I've known
>> him to make me distrust him.
>
> You and I disagree on a few things here. Trying to provide a google
> streetmap of my house as a topic for discussion is something that makes me
> distrust him. Most normal people would suspect somethings a little off
> with that kind of thinking, but evidently you aren't one of them.
>

Hii Dustin .. You and I have made peace with each other. It's OK to
not agree on everything.

I've been wondering how you're doing? Hope you're well.



--
Jenn

[Jenn]

On 3/19/2012 7:23 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>
>>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:14 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>> [....]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> This thread would have had value for newcomers until your ilk
>>>>>>> spoilt it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't spoil it. I was following it with interest and made *no*
>>>>>> comment until some other ****er tried to spoil it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BD certainly *isn't* my 'ilk', and I consider it insulting that you
>>>>>> lumped me together with him in any context.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your manner is putting people off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that I commented on someone trying to spoil the thread?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **** off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>
>>>>> You really are an arrogant Bar Steward.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>
>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.<shrug>
>>>>
>>>> He should apologize but not because you and your cult members say
>>>> so. If he has any character, such actions come naturally.
>>>
>>> Here's the deal- you apologise to me for accusing me of ruining a
>>> thread when I didn't, and then trying to tar me with the same ****ing
>>> brush as BD, and I'll consider apologising for reacting appropriately.
>>>
>>> Seems fair to me.
>>
>> You think Bear should apologize to you?? I think this is one of the
>> funniest things I've read on usenet in the last month!! LOL
>>
> You and your ilk would think that was funny.

I have an ilk? I must be important then!

--
Jenn

[Jenn]

On 3/19/2012 7:42 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> Jenn wrote:
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:14 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>>>> [....]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This thread would have had value for newcomers until your ilk
>>>>>>>>> spoilt it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I didn't spoil it. I was following it with interest and made *no*
>>>>>>>> comment until some other ****er tried to spoil it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BD certainly *isn't* my 'ilk', and I consider it insulting that you
>>>>>>>> lumped me together with him in any context.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your manner is putting people off.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The fact that I commented on someone trying to spoil the thread?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **** off.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You really are an arrogant Bar Steward.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>>>>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>>>>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.<shrug>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He should apologize but not because you and your cult members say
>>>>>> so. If he has any character, such actions come naturally.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the deal- you apologise to me for accusing me of ruining a
>>>>> thread when I didn't, and then trying to tar me with the same ****ing
>>>>> brush as BD, and I'll consider apologising for reacting appropriately.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems fair to me.
>>>>
>>>> You think Bear should apologize to you?? I think this is one of the
>>>> funniest things I've read on usenet in the last month!! LOL
>>>>
>>> You and your ilk would think that was funny.
>>
>> Sometimes I really do wonder about you, FTR.
>>
>> Bear assessed Aardvark correctly in the blink of an eye.
>>
>> Rednecks stand out in any crowd, whatever the country.
>>
> *You* interrupted a thread in which many were participating and other
> interested party's were lurking. Bear's irritation was because of that
> hijacking of a good thread. Aardvark chastised you for doing so, and
> Bear *incorrectly* chastised Aardvark for *your* behavior *and* lumped
> Aardvark together with you (you're the "ilk" in his statement).
>
> Aardvark may seem corrosive or abrasive, but he was *right* and Bear
> should have apologized for lumping him in with you as a disruptive
> influence.
>
> I don't expect Bear to apologize, but a better man would.
>
> That being said, I don't like Aarvark's constant abrasion. But on the
> other hand - nobody said I had to like it. I understand his reasoning
> for doing it.

Bear wasn't happy with Aardvark because Aardvark wasn't nice to him more
than once... which is normal for Aardvark.

I like bear... he's a nice guy from what I can tell... and intelligent,
too!

--
Jenn

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:42:38 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:

> That being said, I don't like Aarvark's constant abrasion.

The thought that it might bother people for whom I hold respect bothers
me somewhat. That's why I ensure that it's finely targetted.

> But on the
> other hand - nobody said I had to like it.

I'd be surprised if *anyone* liked it.

> I understand his reasoning
> for doing it.

Not to do you down in any way, FTR, but it don't take a genius, does it?

:-)



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[FromTheRafters]

Jenn wrote:
> On 3/19/2012 7:42 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> Jenn wrote:
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:14 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>>>>> [....]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This thread would have had value for newcomers until your ilk
>>>>>>>>>> spoilt it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I didn't spoil it. I was following it with interest and made *no*
>>>>>>>>> comment until some other ****er tried to spoil it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BD certainly *isn't* my 'ilk', and I consider it insulting that
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> lumped me together with him in any context.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your manner is putting people off.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The fact that I commented on someone trying to spoil the thread?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **** off.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You really are an arrogant Bar Steward.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>>>>>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>>>>>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.<shrug>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He should apologize but not because you and your cult members say
>>>>>>> so. If he has any character, such actions come naturally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's the deal- you apologise to me for accusing me of ruining a
>>>>>> thread when I didn't, and then trying to tar me with the same ****ing
>>>>>> brush as BD, and I'll consider apologising for reacting
>>>>>> appropriately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems fair to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> You think Bear should apologize to you?? I think this is one of the
>>>>> funniest things I've read on usenet in the last month!! LOL
>>>>>
>>>> You and your ilk would think that was funny.
>>>
>>> Sometimes I really do wonder about you, FTR.
>>>
>>> Bear assessed Aardvark correctly in the blink of an eye.
>>>
>>> Rednecks stand out in any crowd, whatever the country.
>>>
>> *You* interrupted a thread in which many were participating and other
>> interested party's were lurking. Bear's irritation was because of that
>> hijacking of a good thread. Aardvark chastised you for doing so, and
>> Bear *incorrectly* chastised Aardvark for *your* behavior *and* lumped
>> Aardvark together with you (you're the "ilk" in his statement).
>>
>> Aardvark may seem corrosive or abrasive, but he was *right* and Bear
>> should have apologized for lumping him in with you as a disruptive
>> influence.
>>
>> I don't expect Bear to apologize, but a better man would.
>>
>> That being said, I don't like Aarvark's constant abrasion. But on the
>> other hand - nobody said I had to like it. I understand his reasoning
>> for doing it.
>
> Bear wasn't happy with Aardvark because Aardvark wasn't nice to him more
> than once... which is normal for Aardvark.

That may be, but I think you will find that Bear has that effect on
people. That is, if history is taken into account. As far as I can tell
just from recent posts - he seems like an alright guy.

> I like bear... he's a nice guy from what I can tell... and intelligent,
> too!

Sounds like a good assessment.

[FromTheRafters]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:42:38 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:
>
>> That being said, I don't like Aarvark's constant abrasion.
>
> The thought that it might bother people for whom I hold respect bothers
> me somewhat. That's why I ensure that it's finely targetted.
>
>> But on the
>> other hand - nobody said I had to like it.
>
> I'd be surprised if *anyone* liked it.
>
>> I understand his reasoning
>> for doing it.
>
> Not to do you down in any way, FTR, but it don't take a genius, does it?
>
> :-)
>
No, it doesn't.

[FromTheRafters]

Jenn wrote:
> On 3/19/2012 7:23 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> Jenn wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:14 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>>> [....]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This thread would have had value for newcomers until your ilk
>>>>>>>> spoilt it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't spoil it. I was following it with interest and made *no*
>>>>>>> comment until some other ****er tried to spoil it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BD certainly *isn't* my 'ilk', and I consider it insulting that you
>>>>>>> lumped me together with him in any context.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your manner is putting people off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fact that I commented on someone trying to spoil the thread?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **** off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really are an arrogant Bar Steward.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>>>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>>>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.<shrug>
>>>>>
>>>>> He should apologize but not because you and your cult members say
>>>>> so. If he has any character, such actions come naturally.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the deal- you apologise to me for accusing me of ruining a
>>>> thread when I didn't, and then trying to tar me with the same ****ing
>>>> brush as BD, and I'll consider apologising for reacting appropriately.
>>>>
>>>> Seems fair to me.
>>>
>>> You think Bear should apologize to you?? I think this is one of the
>>> funniest things I've read on usenet in the last month!! LOL
>>>
>> You and your ilk would think that was funny.
>
> I have an ilk? I must be important then!
>
TINU TINW BTIAI LOL

[Jenn]

On 3/19/2012 8:47 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
>> On 3/19/2012 7:42 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:

>>> That being said, I don't like Aarvark's constant abrasion. But on the
>>> other hand - nobody said I had to like it. I understand his reasoning
>>> for doing it.
>>
>> Bear wasn't happy with Aardvark because Aardvark wasn't nice to him more
>> than once... which is normal for Aardvark.


> That may be, but I think you will find that Bear has that effect on
> people. That is, if history is taken into account. As far as I can tell
> just from recent posts - he seems like an alright guy.

He appreciates a hospitable welcome, which is what most people I know
would also appreciate. I hope he stays on the test.here group.


>> I like bear... he's a nice guy from what I can tell... and intelligent,
>> too!
>
> Sounds like a good assessment.
>


--
Jenn