Feds shift DNSChanger cut-off deadline to July

[Aardvark]

On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:17:10 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
> news:jk5c6v$srd$3@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:24:17 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>> news:jk09o4$327$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:39:19 -0400, Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why ???
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> For no other reason, apparently, but for what the guy was once.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't make sense, does it?
>>>>
>>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>>>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>
>>>>> Why??? Does he owe you money for the beer ???
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You'd think so, wouldn't you? He hasn't stopped going on about it
>>>> since I drank his ****ing beer.
>>>>
>>>> Wish I'd ****ing refused it now.
>>>>
>>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>>>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes. <shrug>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just exactly who are these Folk ???
>>>>
>>>> That'd be interesting to know.
>>>>
>>>>> What big mistakes ???
>>>>
>>>> That'd be interesting to know.
>>>>
>>>>> Name the folk you are referring to.
>>>>
>>>> That'd be interesting to know.
>>>>
>>>>> Jenn and Eagle does not count.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Well, duh!
>>>
>>> There is something about this I don't get...you drank freely of BD's
>>> beer and have enjoyed the hospitality of his boat and he has photos of
>>> you...but now you act as enemies.
>>>
>>> What happened?
>>
>> He didn't respect our meeting as 'private', nor did he respect my right
>> to privacy on-line.
>>
>> I wasn't the first whose potential safety he ****ed with, and I
>> certainly won't be the last.
>>
>> I advise you yet again to be extremely circumspect in which details of
>> a personal nature you allow to be known in places you know him to be.
>> Even in places you don't know him to be, in fact. He has a tendency to
>> Google search posts made by people who 'interest' him, visiting all the
>> groups to which they post in order to glean as much as he can about
>> them.
>>
>> He will then concatenate all these snippets into a larger picture and
>> post them altogether in one place, for no other apparent reason than
>> that he may say 'Look at what a clever boy I am'.
>>
>> I suspect he may have already begun this with respect to you.
>>
>> *BE CAREFUL*.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> He might even convert an address he finds into a google streetmap view..
> He'll then take the converted data and create a new thread inviting
> discussion on where you might live.
>

I was saving that particular gem for later, Dustin. If Bear requires any
details, should I provide them or refer him to you?

> Nice guy he isn't.

Nor a 'good guy', as many know.



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[Aardvark]

On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:15:45 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:M8idnVTBcaR6gPvSnZ2dnUVZ7t-
> dnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> ~BD~ wonders why Peter Foldes does not answer reasonable questions.
>
> Why not give him your tele number and discuss it over the phone?
>

I thought Peter already had his number.

>> There must be a reason!
>
> Likely plenty.

Indeed.



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[Dustin]

Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
news:jk5ka9$7q4$3@dont-email.me:

> I was saving that particular gem for later, Dustin. If Bear requires
> any details, should I provide them or refer him to you?

Oops. Sorry man. Didn't mean to ruin your good tune. You're welcome to
provide them if you'd like.

>> Nice guy he isn't.
>
> Nor a 'good guy', as many know.

Unless good has a new meaning that I'm unaware of, No.


--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

[Jenn]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0100, Bear wrote:
>
>> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:14 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>> [....]
>>>
>>>>> This thread would have had value for newcomers until your ilk
>>>>> spoilt it.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't spoil it. I was following it with interest and made *no*
>>>> comment until some other ****er tried to spoil it.
>>>>
>>>> BD certainly *isn't* my 'ilk', and I consider it insulting that you
>>>> lumped me together with him in any context.
>>>>
>>>>> Your manner is putting people off.
>>>>
>>>> The fact that I commented on someone trying to spoil the thread?
>>>>
>>>> **** off.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>
>>> You really are an arrogant Bar Steward.
>>>
>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>
>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes. <shrug>
>>
>> He should apologize but not because you and your cult members say
>> so. If he has any character, such actions come naturally.
>
> Here's the deal- you apologise to me for accusing me of ruining a
> thread when I didn't, and then trying to tar me with the same ****ing
> brush as BD, and I'll consider apologising for reacting appropriately.
>
> Seems fair to me.

You think Bear should apologize to you?? I think this is one of the
funniest things I've read on usenet in the last month!! LOL

--
Jenn

[Jenn]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:17:10 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>
>> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>> news:jk5c6v$srd$3@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:24:17 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>>> news:jk09o4$327$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:39:19 -0400, Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why ???
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> For no other reason, apparently, but for what the guy was once.
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't make sense, does it?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat
>>>>>>> with your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why??? Does he owe you money for the beer ???
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You'd think so, wouldn't you? He hasn't stopped going on about it
>>>>> since I drank his ****ing beer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wish I'd ****ing refused it now.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to
>>>>>>> see your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.
>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just exactly who are these Folk ???
>>>>>
>>>>> That'd be interesting to know.
>>>>>
>>>>>> What big mistakes ???
>>>>>
>>>>> That'd be interesting to know.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Name the folk you are referring to.
>>>>>
>>>>> That'd be interesting to know.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jenn and Eagle does not count.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well, duh!
>>>>
>>>> There is something about this I don't get...you drank freely of
>>>> BD's beer and have enjoyed the hospitality of his boat and he has
>>>> photos of you...but now you act as enemies.
>>>>
>>>> What happened?
>>>
>>> He didn't respect our meeting as 'private', nor did he respect my
>>> right to privacy on-line.
>>>
>>> I wasn't the first whose potential safety he ****ed with, and I
>>> certainly won't be the last.
>>>
>>> I advise you yet again to be extremely circumspect in which details
>>> of a personal nature you allow to be known in places you know him
>>> to be. Even in places you don't know him to be, in fact. He has a
>>> tendency to Google search posts made by people who 'interest' him,
>>> visiting all the groups to which they post in order to glean as
>>> much as he can about them.
>>>
>>> He will then concatenate all these snippets into a larger picture
>>> and post them altogether in one place, for no other apparent reason
>>> than that he may say 'Look at what a clever boy I am'.
>>>
>>> I suspect he may have already begun this with respect to you.
>>>
>>> *BE CAREFUL*.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> He might even convert an address he finds into a google streetmap
>> view.. He'll then take the converted data and create a new thread
>> inviting discussion on where you might live.
>>
>
> I was saving that particular gem for later, Dustin. If Bear requires
> any details, should I provide them or refer him to you?
>
>> Nice guy he isn't.
>
> Nor a 'good guy', as many know.

Dave is a good guy .. he's never done anything as long as I've known him to
make me distrust him.

--
Jenn

[~BD~]

Jenn wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:17:10 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark<aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>> news:jk5c6v$srd$3@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:24:17 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Aardvark<aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>>>> news:jk09o4$327$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:39:19 -0400, Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why ???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> For no other reason, apparently, but for what the guy was once.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doesn't make sense, does it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat
>>>>>>>> with your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why??? Does he owe you money for the beer ???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You'd think so, wouldn't you? He hasn't stopped going on about it
>>>>>> since I drank his ****ing beer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wish I'd ****ing refused it now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to
>>>>>>>> see your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.
>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just exactly who are these Folk ???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That'd be interesting to know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What big mistakes ???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That'd be interesting to know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Name the folk you are referring to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That'd be interesting to know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jenn and Eagle does not count.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, duh!
>>>>>
>>>>> There is something about this I don't get...you drank freely of
>>>>> BD's beer and have enjoyed the hospitality of his boat and he has
>>>>> photos of you...but now you act as enemies.
>>>>>
>>>>> What happened?
>>>>
>>>> He didn't respect our meeting as 'private', nor did he respect my
>>>> right to privacy on-line.
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't the first whose potential safety he ****ed with, and I
>>>> certainly won't be the last.
>>>>
>>>> I advise you yet again to be extremely circumspect in which details
>>>> of a personal nature you allow to be known in places you know him
>>>> to be. Even in places you don't know him to be, in fact. He has a
>>>> tendency to Google search posts made by people who 'interest' him,
>>>> visiting all the groups to which they post in order to glean as
>>>> much as he can about them.
>>>>
>>>> He will then concatenate all these snippets into a larger picture
>>>> and post them altogether in one place, for no other apparent reason
>>>> than that he may say 'Look at what a clever boy I am'.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect he may have already begun this with respect to you.
>>>>
>>>> *BE CAREFUL*.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> He might even convert an address he finds into a google streetmap
>>> view.. He'll then take the converted data and create a new thread
>>> inviting discussion on where you might live.
>>>
>>
>> I was saving that particular gem for later, Dustin. If Bear requires
>> any details, should I provide them or refer him to you?
>>
>>> Nice guy he isn't.
>>
>> Nor a 'good guy', as many know.
>
> Dave is a good guy .. he's never done anything as long as I've known him to
> make me distrust him.
>

Thanks, little sister! {{{{{Hug}}}}} :-)

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Dustin]

"Jenn" <me@noe.mail.com> wrote in news:jk87ei$4f5$1@dont-email.me:

> Dave is a good guy .. he's never done anything as long as I've known
> him to make me distrust him.

You and I disagree on a few things here. Trying to provide a google
streetmap of my house as a topic for discussion is something that makes me
distrust him. Most normal people would suspect somethings a little off
with that kind of thinking, but evidently you aren't one of them.




--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:42:16 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> "Jenn" <me@noe.mail.com> wrote in news:jk87ei$4f5$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Dave is a good guy .. he's never done anything as long as I've known
>> him to make me distrust him.
>
> You and I disagree on a few things here. Trying to provide a google
> streetmap of my house as a topic for discussion is something that makes
> me distrust him. Most normal people would suspect somethings a little
> off with that kind of thinking, but evidently you aren't one of them.

Beats me how *anyone* could have totally missed just about everything the
****er ever does.

Talk about ****ing blind spots!!!!!!!!!!!!



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[FromTheRafters]

Jenn wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>
>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:14 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>> [....]
>>>>
>>>>>> This thread would have had value for newcomers until your ilk
>>>>>> spoilt it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't spoil it. I was following it with interest and made *no*
>>>>> comment until some other ****er tried to spoil it.
>>>>>
>>>>> BD certainly *isn't* my 'ilk', and I consider it insulting that you
>>>>> lumped me together with him in any context.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your manner is putting people off.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that I commented on someone trying to spoil the thread?
>>>>>
>>>>> **** off.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>
>>>> You really are an arrogant Bar Steward.
>>>>
>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>
>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.<shrug>
>>>
>>> He should apologize but not because you and your cult members say
>>> so. If he has any character, such actions come naturally.
>>
>> Here's the deal- you apologise to me for accusing me of ruining a
>> thread when I didn't, and then trying to tar me with the same ****ing
>> brush as BD, and I'll consider apologising for reacting appropriately.
>>
>> Seems fair to me.
>
> You think Bear should apologize to you?? I think this is one of the
> funniest things I've read on usenet in the last month!! LOL
>
You and your ilk would think that was funny.

[~BD~]

FromTheRafters wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>
>>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>>> news:OdWdncp1kdiIRMLSnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:14 +0100, Bear wrote:
>>>>> [....]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> This thread would have had value for newcomers until your ilk
>>>>>>> spoilt it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't spoil it. I was following it with interest and made *no*
>>>>>> comment until some other ****er tried to spoil it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BD certainly *isn't* my 'ilk', and I consider it insulting that you
>>>>>> lumped me together with him in any context.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your manner is putting people off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that I commented on someone trying to spoil the thread?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **** off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I think you should apologise to 'Bear'.
>>>>>
>>>>> You really are an arrogant Bar Steward.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell him, too, that you came and visited me on my narrowboat with
>>>>> your son and daughter - *and* drank my beer!
>>>>>
>>>>> You speak with a forked tongue, Aardvark. Folk are beginning to see
>>>>> your *real* persona - you're making really big mistakes.<shrug>
>>>>
>>>> He should apologize but not because you and your cult members say
>>>> so. If he has any character, such actions come naturally.
>>>
>>> Here's the deal- you apologise to me for accusing me of ruining a
>>> thread when I didn't, and then trying to tar me with the same ****ing
>>> brush as BD, and I'll consider apologising for reacting appropriately.
>>>
>>> Seems fair to me.
>>
>> You think Bear should apologize to you?? I think this is one of the
>> funniest things I've read on usenet in the last month!! LOL
>>
> You and your ilk would think that was funny.

Sometimes I really do wonder about you, FTR.

Bear assessed Aardvark correctly in the blink of an eye.

Rednecks stand out in any crowd, whatever the country.

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."