On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:32:08 -0500, "David H. Lipman"
<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:

>From: "Stephen Wolstenholme" <steve@npsl1.com>
>
>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:04:32 -0600, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
>>>
>>>> Many people won't watch either threads.
>>>
>>> Especially when using a deliberately vague Subject header.
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Neural network software applications, help and support.
>>> <snipped rest of spam signature>
>>>
>>> Please don't spam.
>>
>> It's within my signature and my signature conforms with "standards"
>> available when I started on Usenet about 25 years ago. I'm not going
>> to change now!
>>
>> Steve
>>
>Actually I believe the "standards" are for 4 lines or less. However I am
>not one to quibble about two extra lines. I have certainly seen worse and
>VanguardLH is a wee bit overzealous on this subject matter.
>

Despite me saying that I'm not changing my signature, I have removed
the description line so it's now four lines. Now it's just application
names and URL's. I'll risk the lack of description. Can you remember
if there was ever any mention of spaces and line length in the
"standard"?

Steve

--
Neural Network Software. http://www.npsl1.com
EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. http://www.easynn.com
SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. http://www.swingnn.com
JustNN. Just Neural Networks. http://www.justnn.com