Spyware Blaster Update

[Timmy]

another couple sites added

[VanguardLH]

Timmy wrote:

> another couple sites added

Since siljaline's earlier post here one day earlier?

I just tried an update to SpywareBlaster. No new updates (I last did
one yesterday at 11:50PM). In the program, it says the latest update
version for the database was 02/21/2012 (yesterday). It doesn't mention
a time, just date.

[~BD~]

VanguardLH wrote:
> Timmy wrote:
>
>> another couple sites added
>
> Since siljaline's earlier post here one day earlier?
>
> I just tried an update to SpywareBlaster. No new updates (I last did
> one yesterday at 11:50PM). In the program, it says the latest update
> version for the database was 02/21/2012 (yesterday). It doesn't mention
> a time, just date.

FYI (from C|Net)

SpywareBlaster started out as a malicious software blocker focused on
ActiveX-based attacks. It has kept that component and expanded, and now
can block all kinds of spyware that gets delivered through your Web
browser, although its defenses are most useful for Internet Explorer users.

The dedicated IE tools are useful. Users can block all Flash content,
create encrypted backups of the Hosts file, manage browser page
settings, block cookies, and create customized ActiveX blocks. Firefox
and Netscape-specific protection only offers cookie blocking, but you
can create a customized blacklist that will function across multiple
browsers. Users can also create a system snapshot for PC recovery in
case of a devastating attack. The interface is designed well,
uncluttered and easy to navigate. For $10 a year users can get automatic
definition file updates and tech support, otherwise those must be done
manually.

It's a little surprising that there's no support for Opera, and there's
a noticeable lack of spyware removal capabilities. Although we
appreciate the good job that SpywareBlaster has done in the past, this
current version doesn't hold up very well against other security
products that prevent attacks and remove infections.

Read more:
http://download.cnet.com/SpywareBlas...-10196637.html
--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Bullwinkle.]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
newst2dnVp4Uffcs73SnZ2dnUVZ8lednZ2d@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree


Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>

Good job I didn't steal it then!

It's 'open source' here on Usenet!

bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DSnZ2dnUVZ8iydnZ2d@bt.com...
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.

OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."

bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on



I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.

[Peter Foldes]

"VanguardLH" <V@nguard.LH> wrote in message news:ji5g1v$r99$1@news.albasani.net...
> Timmy wrote:
>
>> another couple sites added
>
> Since siljaline's earlier post here one day earlier?
>
> I just tried an update to SpywareBlaster. No new updates (I last did
> one yesterday at 11:50PM). In the program, it says the latest update
> version for the database was 02/21/2012 (yesterday). It doesn't mention
> a time, just date.


The OP was one day late to post what Silj already posted. In essence it became a
double posting.

SJ

[VanguardLH]

Peter Foldes wrote:

> VanguardLH wrote ...
>
>> Timmy wrote:
>>
>>> another couple sites added
>>
>> Since siljaline's earlier post here one day earlier?
>
> The OP was one day late to post what Silj already posted. In essence
> it became a double posting.

It looked like a day-later duplicated post but I couldn't be sure that I
somehow missed an update or the update process wasn't working. Twould
be handy if the database update included a version number besides a
datestamp (and a timestamp would be handy, too). Then posters could
include a version number in their announcement.

[Timmy]

VanguardLH wrote...

>
> Timmy wrote:
>
> > another couple sites added
>
> Since siljaline's earlier post here one day earlier?


There's so much ****e being posted by that ****tard BD, most of the time I look
and mark everything as read.
In fact, I can't see any post made yesterday about the update.


>
> I just tried an update to SpywareBlaster. No new updates (I last did
> one yesterday at 11:50PM). In the program, it says the latest update
> version for the database was 02/21/2012 (yesterday). It doesn't mention
> a time, just date.


Your time/date isn't the same as mine. Usenet isn't just for septics.

[Peter Foldes]

"Timmy" <Timmy@to.ms> wrote in message
news:MPG.29b0766075998a159896ec@news.aioe.org...> VanguardLH wrote...


> There's so much ****e being posted by that ****tard BD, most of the time I look
> and mark everything as read.
> In fact, I can't see any post made yesterday about the update.



Yesterday in this same very newsgroup

Header
SpywareBlaster Database Update Feb 21 2012 posted by Siljaline at 2/23/2012 at 11:15
AM

JS

[Timmy]

Peter Foldes wrote...

>
> "Timmy" <Timmy@to.ms> wrote in message
> news:MPG.29b0766075998a159896ec@news.aioe.org...> VanguardLH wrote...
>
>
> > There's so much ****e being posted by that ****tard BD, most of the time I look
> > and mark everything as read.
> > In fact, I can't see any post made yesterday about the update.
>
>
>
> Yesterday in this same very newsgroup
>
> Header
> SpywareBlaster Database Update Feb 21 2012 posted by Siljaline at 2/23/2012 at 11:15
> AM
>
> JS


Repeated subjects show up under original posts with this newsreader

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Timmy wrote:

> Peter Foldes wrote...
>> VanguardLH wrote...
>>> There's so much ****e being posted by that ****tard BD,

How true!!!

>>> most of the
>>> time I look and mark everything as read.
>>> In fact, I can't see any post made yesterday about the update.
>>
>> Yesterday in this same very newsgroup
>>
>> Header
>> SpywareBlaster Database Update Feb 21 2012 posted by Siljaline at
>> 2/23/2012 at 11:15 AM
>
> Repeated subjects show up under original posts with this newsreader

That excuse won't work. :-) Your subject line and the other one are
different. You should also fix your newsreader to thread by References
instead of by Subject.

--
-bts
-This space for rent, but the price is high