HiJackThis is now Open Source

[Bullwinkle.]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
newst2dnVp4Uffcs73SnZ2dnUVZ8lednZ2d@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree


Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>

Good job I didn't steal it then!

It's 'open source' here on Usenet!

bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DSnZ2dnUVZ8iydnZ2d@bt.com...
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.

OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."

bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on



I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.

[Oldus Fartus]

On 27/02/2012 6:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Oldus Fartus wrote:
>> [....]
>>>> Your link must be screwed, nothing there about computer problems, only
>>>> hinky feelings.
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK - I thought you were serious.
>>>
>>> My mistake.
>>>
>>> There was no way you could have read though all those posts. <shrug>
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/micro...558a55b1f92923
>>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/micro...5eff00dfbe93b8
>

I read enough to see that you were offered very good advice after an
infection which *you* allowed onto your computer. It appreciate that it
was most unfortunate, but at the end of the day you, or whoever was
using your computer at the time allowed it "in".

If I had to guess, I would almost bet it came into your system via an
HTML email from what you believed to be a trusted source.

--
Cheers
Oldus Fartus

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:23:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:

> Now then, rather than completely reinvent the wheel, if you are really
> interested, please have a scan through this thread from when my memory
> was more fresh.
>
> http://goo.gl/5xa6R

You were a paranoid, klo0less, klo0-resistant no0b then and you're a
paranoid, klo0less, klo0-resistant no0b now.

**** me! How can anyone be so ****ing sto0pid as to have apparently
learned nothing over five years in umpteen NGs?



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[~BD~]

Oldus Fartus wrote:
> On 27/02/2012 6:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Oldus Fartus wrote:
>>> [....]
>>>>> Your link must be screwed, nothing there about computer problems, only
>>>>> hinky feelings.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK - I thought you were serious.
>>>>
>>>> My mistake.
>>>>
>>>> There was no way you could have read though all those posts. <shrug>
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/micro...558a55b1f92923
>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/micro...5eff00dfbe93b8
>>
>>
>
> I read enough to see that you were offered very good advice after an
> infection which *you* allowed onto your computer. It appreciate that it
> was most unfortunate, but at the end of the day you, or whoever was
> using your computer at the time allowed it "in".
>
> If I had to guess, I would almost bet it came into your system via an
> HTML email from what you believed to be a trusted source.
>

You still do not understand! <shakes head>

I accept full responsibility for the malware which led to the fraudulent
payment to PayPal back in 2005 - a sum of £245 which was later
recovered. Your comment above is not disputed in this regard.

What I am referring to is, much later, a person or persons unknown
operating from Annexcafe User2User, deliberately disabled my computer on
a number of occasions. The method and symptoms described by Sycho fit
the bill exactly!

I can't believe you looked at the other two links I provided or you
would have understood. <shrug>

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:06:52 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:

> Oldus Fartus wrote:
>> On 27/02/2012 6:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> Oldus Fartus wrote:
>>>> [....]
>>>>>> Your link must be screwed, nothing there about computer problems,
>>>>>> only hinky feelings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> OK - I thought you were serious.
>>>>>
>>>>> My mistake.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was no way you could have read though all those posts. <shrug>
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/micro...ecurity.virus/
msg/9f558a55b1f92923
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/micro...ecurity.virus/
msg/405eff00dfbe93b8
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I read enough to see that you were offered very good advice after an
>> infection which *you* allowed onto your computer. It appreciate that it
>> was most unfortunate, but at the end of the day you, or whoever was
>> using your computer at the time allowed it "in".
>>
>> If I had to guess, I would almost bet it came into your system via an
>> HTML email from what you believed to be a trusted source.
>>
>>
> You still do not understand! <shakes head>
>

Of course he does- you're a paranoid, klo0-resistant moron.

> I accept full responsibility for the malware which led to the fraudulent
> payment to PayPal back in 2005 - a sum of £245 which was later
> recovered. <SNIP THE REST>

Good! Now forget it and move on.




--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:gPydnZMBY740xNbSnZ2dnUVZ8k2dnZ2d@bt.com...

> Hello again, OF. I feel much better after bacon, scrambled eggs, mushrooms and
> tomato! :-)
>
> Now then, rather than completely reinvent the wheel, if you are really interested,
> please have a scan through this thread from when my memory was more fresh.
> http://goo.gl/5xa6R
>
> I'm happy to answer any questions you may have thereafter.
>



LOL. It was not breakfast but rather time to find that 5 year old posts. Funny
though,that you started posting 2 hrs ago and you are now having breakfast. You are
Trolling again David. Nothing whatsoever wrong with your computer (XP) as you have
stated the same a few weeks ago.

Why are you playing your slimy games??? All that you were trying to achieve here
with your posts and your links is to bring up the agenda with Annexcafe why you were
banned and try showing everyone that you are the good guy which you are not

JS

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:aOidndb0Hp5M_NbSnZ2dnUVZ8vGdnZ2d@bt.com...

>>> There was no way you could have read though all those posts. <shrug>
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/micro...558a55b1f92923
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/micro...5eff00dfbe93b8
>



Again your agenda with Annexcafe. Stop Trolling

JS

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
>
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:gPydnZMBY740xNbSnZ2dnUVZ8k2dnZ2d@bt.com...
>
>> Hello again, OF. I feel much better after bacon, scrambled eggs,
>> mushrooms and tomato! :-)
>>
>> Now then, rather than completely reinvent the wheel, if you are really
>> interested, please have a scan through this thread from when my memory
>> was more fresh.
>> http://goo.gl/5xa6R
>>
>> I'm happy to answer any questions you may have thereafter.
>>
>
>
>
> LOL. It was not breakfast but rather time to find that 5 year old posts.
> Funny though,that you started posting 2 hrs ago and you are now having
> breakfast. You are Trolling again David. Nothing whatsoever wrong with
> your computer (XP) as you have stated the same a few weeks ago.
>
> Why are you playing your slimy games??? All that you were trying to
> achieve here with your posts and your links is to bring up the agenda
> with Annexcafe why you were banned and try showing everyone that you are
> the good guy which you are not
>
> JS

I'll wager that you now wish that *you* had told the truth! :-)

Watch out for the RCMP coming back on their next visit - soon!

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[FromTheRafters]

~BD~ wrote:
> G. Morgan wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:35:40 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:
>>>
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm wondering if the author is correct in what he claims. Some
>>>>> guidance
>>>>> on this will be welcomed!
>>>>
>>>> If you can't read a simple batch file, that question is beyond the
>>>> scope
>>>> of this (these) groups. If you have a genuine interest ask in
>>>> alt.msdos.batch.nt
>>>
>>> Like everything in there won't be completely over his head, mate.
>>
>> I think he's just asking questions for the hell of it, even bad
>> publicity is good for him - happy as a lark. (a drunk one)
>>
>
> Do you disagree with the claim Sycho made (Betty's new friend) - that he
> could close down a PC using a Batch file?

Huh?

Let's try

[FromTheRafters]

Oldus Fartus wrote:
> On 27/02/2012 4:53 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>
> snippers
>
>>>
>>> Only partly Dave. The batch file would fail - but I will leave the
>>> reason for that for you to discover. The rest, similarly, is only partly
>>> true - depending on the configuration of the target machine.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you for your view, OF. The syptoms Sycho describes are exactly
>> what I recall happening to my machine. As you might imagine, the
>> configuration of my computer no doubt left it vulnerable to attack.
>>
>
> I am going to regret this, but what happened to your computer?
>
The worse thing imaginable - - it still works!!