Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 217

Thread: HiJackThis is now Open Source

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    Peter Foldes wrote:
    >
    > "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    > news:K8idncRWi5LgJN7SnZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
    >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    >>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
    >>>>
    >>>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
    >>>>
    >>>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.

    >
    >
    >
    >
    > You paranoid dumb Troll. That is not the post that Beauregard T.
    > Shagnasty was talking about.


    Post the Message ID so there can be no doubt!

    > Get your eyes straight and then answer
    > correctly and not assume which you were not but rather you wanted to
    > solicit an answer to your liking. You are a slimy person BD and that
    > will never change.


    So, Tell me Peter ...

    If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
    - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
    place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

    Is there any organisation (FBI perhaps?) responsible for checking that
    no such action *is* taken by somebody on one or more of the 'help' sites
    listed?

    I appreciate that getting through a firewall is not a plug-n-play thing
    for script-kiddies; it has to be carefully planned and executed!


    > Also why you need to crosspost continually is beyond comprehension
    >
    > JS


    Where I choose to post is no concern of yours.

    --
    Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
    for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
    do unto you."

  2. #2
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    ~BD~ wrote:

    >If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
    >- would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
    >place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?


    You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
    get fixed.

    Why should people go out of their way to help if all they get is
    unwarranted suspicion as a reward?



  3. #3
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    G. Morgan wrote:
    > ~BD~ wrote:
    >
    >> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
    >> - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
    >> place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

    >
    > You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
    > get fixed.


    Great, then he can be fux0red at the hardware level. )

    [...]

  4. #4
    Beauregard T. Shagnasty Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    FromTheRafters wrote:

    > G. Morgan wrote:
    >> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and
    >>> 'registers' - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker
    >>> lurking there to place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

    >>
    >> You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to get
    >> fixed.

    >
    > Great, then he can be fux0red at the hardware level. )


    (Oh pleeeeeze yes!)

    --
    -bts
    -This space for rent, but the price is high

  5. #5
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    > FromTheRafters wrote:
    >
    >> G. Morgan wrote:
    >>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and
    >>>> 'registers' - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker
    >>>> lurking there to place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?
    >>>
    >>> You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to get
    >>> fixed.

    >>
    >> Great, then he can be fux0red at the hardware level. )

    >
    > (Oh pleeeeeze yes!)
    >


    *Answering* my straight-forward questions is another avenue for you to
    explore! Try it - you might like it! :-)

    --
    Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
    for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
    do unto you."

  6. #6
    Bullwinkle. Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    newst2dnVp4Uffcs73SnZ2dnUVZ8lednZ2d@bt.com...
    bd is a Thief:
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
    Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
    Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree


    Mike Easter wrote:
    > ~BD~ wrote:
    >> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
    >>
    >> I hope this isn't copyright material!

    >
    > It is.
    >
    > There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
    > Brisbee-related and other page/s.
    >
    >
    >


    Good job I didn't steal it then!

    It's 'open source' here on Usenet!

    bd lies:
    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DSnZ2dnUVZ8iydnZ2d@bt.com...
    Mike Easter wrote:
    > ~BD~ wrote:
    > A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
    > lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
    > and nothing but the truth' by omission.


    OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
    truth' by omission."

    bd tries to bully women:
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
    Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
    Subject: Re: An old friend passes on



    I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
    start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.


  7. #7
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    FromTheRafters wrote:

    >G. Morgan wrote:
    >> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>
    >>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
    >>> - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
    >>> place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

    >>
    >> You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
    >> get fixed.

    >
    >Great, then he can be fux0red at the hardware level. )


    I'm sure the "Geek Squad" would not try to sell him anything he
    doesn't need! <I almost made myself laugh>


  8. #8
    Dustin Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in
    news:u4t7k7p0e9p8snvt45fb3ht6up680lf5dq@Osama-is-dead.net:

    > FromTheRafters wrote:
    >
    >>G. Morgan wrote:
    >>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and
    >>>> 'registers' - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker
    >>>> lurking there to place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?
    >>>
    >>> You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
    >>> get fixed.

    >>
    >>Great, then he can be fux0red at the hardware level. )

    >
    > I'm sure the "Geek Squad" would not try to sell him anything he
    > doesn't need! <I almost made myself laugh>
    >
    >


    Nor would they charge him an outrageous fee! I have a better (imho)
    suggestion tho. Perhaps he should have Bear examine the machine and follow
    whatever advice Bear offers?


    --
    Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
    many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
    the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

  9. #9
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    Dustin wrote:
    > G. Morgan<sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in
    > news:u4t7k7p0e9p8snvt45fb3ht6up680lf5dq@Osama-is-dead.net:
    >
    >> FromTheRafters wrote:
    >>
    >>> G. Morgan wrote:
    >>>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and
    >>>>> 'registers' - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker
    >>>>> lurking there to place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?
    >>>>
    >>>> You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
    >>>> get fixed.
    >>>
    >>> Great, then he can be fux0red at the hardware level. )

    >>
    >> I'm sure the "Geek Squad" would not try to sell him anything he
    >> doesn't need!<I almost made myself laugh>
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Nor would they charge him an outrageous fee! I have a better (imho)
    > suggestion tho. Perhaps he should have Bear examine the machine and follow
    > whatever advice Bear offers?


    Do you refer to *PABear*, aka Robear Dyer MVP?

    --
    Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
    for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
    do unto you."

  10. #10
    Bullwinkle. Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    newst2dnVp4Uffcs73SnZ2dnUVZ8lednZ2d@bt.com...
    bd is a Thief:
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
    Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
    Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree


    Mike Easter wrote:
    > ~BD~ wrote:
    >> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
    >>
    >> I hope this isn't copyright material!

    >
    > It is.
    >
    > There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
    > Brisbee-related and other page/s.
    >
    >
    >


    Good job I didn't steal it then!

    It's 'open source' here on Usenet!

    bd lies:
    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DSnZ2dnUVZ8iydnZ2d@bt.com...
    Mike Easter wrote:
    > ~BD~ wrote:
    > A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
    > lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
    > and nothing but the truth' by omission.


    OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
    truth' by omission."

    bd tries to bully women:
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
    Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
    Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
    Subject: Re: An old friend passes on



    I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
    start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •