Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
>>
>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
>>
>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.
>
> People sort in many ways.
>
> If you wanted to reply to Foldes, reply to his message, not mine.

I thought I had. I even started with "Tell me. Peter ..."

Please explain exactly *how* I should have handled matters differently.

>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> And the Tsunami trojan still has nothing to do with HighJackThis.
>>
>> Agreed. I had no intention of making it seem that it had. :-(
>
> Then why did you copy/paste something entirely irrelevant in this thread?

I have no idea what you are talking about! I scribed, personally, this:-

Tell me, Peter .....

If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
- would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

Is there any organisation (FBI perhaps?) responsible for checking that
no such action *is* taken by somebody on one or more of the 'help' sites
listed?

I appreciate that getting through a firewall is not a plug-n-play thing
for script-kiddies; it has to be carefully planned and executed!

*

What do you think was copy/pasted?

>> Here are the 'References' from your Header:
>
> Don't act like you think I don't know how to read headers.

Don't be so aggressive all the time. Be nice! :-)

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."