HiJackThis is now Open Source

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

~BD~ wrote:

> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
>
> http://
>
> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.

People sort in many ways.

If you wanted to reply to Foldes, reply to his message, not mine.

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> And the Tsunami trojan still has nothing to do with HighJackThis.
>
> Agreed. I had no intention of making it seem that it had. :-(

Then why did you copy/paste something entirely irrelevant in this thread?

> Here are the 'References' from your Header:

Don't act like you think I don't know how to read headers.

--
-bts
-This space for rent, but the price is high

[~BD~]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
>>
>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
>>
>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.
>
> People sort in many ways.
>
> If you wanted to reply to Foldes, reply to his message, not mine.

I thought I had. I even started with "Tell me. Peter ..."

Please explain exactly *how* I should have handled matters differently.

>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> And the Tsunami trojan still has nothing to do with HighJackThis.
>>
>> Agreed. I had no intention of making it seem that it had. :-(
>
> Then why did you copy/paste something entirely irrelevant in this thread?

I have no idea what you are talking about! I scribed, personally, this:-

Tell me, Peter .....

If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
- would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

Is there any organisation (FBI perhaps?) responsible for checking that
no such action *is* taken by somebody on one or more of the 'help' sites
listed?

I appreciate that getting through a firewall is not a plug-n-play thing
for script-kiddies; it has to be carefully planned and executed!

*

What do you think was copy/pasted?

>> Here are the 'References' from your Header:
>
> Don't act like you think I don't know how to read headers.

Don't be so aggressive all the time. Be nice! :-)

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:K8idncRWi5LgJN7SnZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
>>>
>>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
>>>
>>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.




You paranoid dumb Troll. That is not the post that Beauregard T. Shagnasty was
talking about. Get your eyes straight and then answer correctly and not assume which
you were not but rather you wanted to solicit an answer to your liking. You are a
slimy person BD and that will never change.

Also why you need to crosspost continually is beyond comprehension

JS

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
>
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:K8idncRWi5LgJN7SnZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
>>>>
>>>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.
>
>
>
>
> You paranoid dumb Troll. That is not the post that Beauregard T.
> Shagnasty was talking about.

Post the Message ID so there can be no doubt!

> Get your eyes straight and then answer
> correctly and not assume which you were not but rather you wanted to
> solicit an answer to your liking. You are a slimy person BD and that
> will never change.

So, Tell me Peter ...

If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
- would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

Is there any organisation (FBI perhaps?) responsible for checking that
no such action *is* taken by somebody on one or more of the 'help' sites
listed?

I appreciate that getting through a firewall is not a plug-n-play thing
for script-kiddies; it has to be carefully planned and executed!


> Also why you need to crosspost continually is beyond comprehension
>
> JS

Where I choose to post is no concern of yours.

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[G. Morgan]

~BD~ wrote:

>If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
>- would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
>place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
get fixed.

Why should people go out of their way to help if all they get is
unwarranted suspicion as a reward?

[FromTheRafters]

G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
>> - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
>> place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?
>
> You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
> get fixed.

Great, then he can be fux0red at the hardware level. )

[...]

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

FromTheRafters wrote:

> G. Morgan wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and
>>> 'registers' - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker
>>> lurking there to place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?
>>
>> You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to get
>> fixed.
>
> Great, then he can be fux0red at the hardware level. )

(Oh pleeeeeze yes!)

--
-bts
-This space for rent, but the price is high

[G. Morgan]

FromTheRafters wrote:

>G. Morgan wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
>>> - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
>>> place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?
>>
>> You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
>> get fixed.
>
>Great, then he can be fux0red at the hardware level. )

I'm sure the "Geek Squad" would not try to sell him anything he
doesn't need! <I almost made myself laugh>

[~BD~]

G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
>> - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
>> place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?
>
> You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
> get fixed.

I prefer to fix it myself, thanks!

So far, so good! :-)

> Why should people go out of their way to help if all they get is
> unwarranted suspicion as a reward?

Unwarranted?!!! WTF??? Let me quote PF:-

"Also I left this for the last. He was so ignorant and stupid that we
were able to compromise his computer from within Annex Technologies."

And *YES* - *they did*! They *did* do just that!

(I don't make this stuff up! <eg>)

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi...za.aioe.org%3E


--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:8_6dnezykfObZd7SnZ2dnUVZ8sKdnZ2d@bt.com...

> Unwarranted?!!! WTF??? Let me quote PF:-
>
> "Also I left this for the last. He was so ignorant and stupid that we were able to
> compromise his computer from within Annex Technologies."



Never or ever did I post something like that you lying screwed up Troll. You
lie,forge,discriminate,insinuate and most of all garbage is all that comes out of
you. Go on your narrowboat and sink with it

JS