Results 1 to 10 of 217

Thread: HiJackThis is now Open Source

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Beauregard T. Shagnasty Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    ~BD~ wrote:

    > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    >> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    >>>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and
    >>>>> 'registers' - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker
    >>>>> lurking there to place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?
    >>>>
    >>>> Your hinky paranoia is working overtime yet again.
    >>>
    >>> I care about the safety of others, not for myself. I abhor Cybercrime
    >>> and those who commit same. Surely you do, too?
    >>>
    >>>> Why do you care? You use a Mac.
    >>>
    >>> Do keep up, Bts! ;-)
    >>>
    >>> Tsunami backdoor trojan ported from *Linux* to take control of Macs
    >>> too

    >>
    >> Apples/oranges. That has absolutely nothing to do with HighJackThis
    >> (the subject of your thread), which is a Windows-only program.
    >>
    >> Do keep up, ~BD~.

    >
    > Not a magnanimous response. You know full well that I was responding to
    > Foldes, a proven liar, with regard to various 'help' sites.


    No, I don't know full well, as you replied to me. I do not see "Foldes"
    in the attributes above. And the Tsunami trojan still has nothing to do
    with HighJackThis.

    --
    -bts
    -This space for rent, but the price is high

  2. #2
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    > ~BD~ wrote:
    >
    >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    >>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    >>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>>>> If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and
    >>>>>> 'registers' - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker
    >>>>>> lurking there to place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Your hinky paranoia is working overtime yet again.
    >>>>
    >>>> I care about the safety of others, not for myself. I abhor Cybercrime
    >>>> and those who commit same. Surely you do, too?
    >>>>
    >>>>> Why do you care? You use a Mac.
    >>>>
    >>>> Do keep up, Bts! ;-)
    >>>>
    >>>> Tsunami backdoor trojan ported from *Linux* to take control of Macs
    >>>> too
    >>>
    >>> Apples/oranges. That has absolutely nothing to do with HighJackThis
    >>> (the subject of your thread), which is a Windows-only program.
    >>>
    >>> Do keep up, ~BD~.

    >>
    >> Not a magnanimous response. You know full well that I was responding to
    >> Foldes, a proven liar, with regard to various 'help' sites.

    >
    > No, I don't know full well, as you replied to me. I do not see "Foldes"
    > in the attributes above.



    This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:

    http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg

    Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.

    > And the Tsunami trojan still has nothing to do with HighJackThis.


    Agreed. I had no intention of making it seem that it had. :-(

    Here are the 'References' from your Header:

    <XOydneUV-YkkPd_SnZ2dnUVZ8sydnZ2d@bt.com>
    <jhugf4$2tv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ueSdnYaJkMn4fN_SnZ2dnUVZ7vOdnZ2d@bt.com>
    <jhvfev$8vb$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pOKdnfXHrq6vD97SnZ2dnUVZ8mSdnZ2d@bt.com>
    <ji03vg$8d2$1@dont-email.me> <mdWdnRBjSf24A97SnZ2dnUVZ7smdnZ2d@bt.com>
    <ji08l6$7f8$1@dont-email.me> <KbKdnXoeodeEOt7SnZ2dnUVZ7o2dnZ2d@bt.com>

    --
    Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
    for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
    do unto you."

  3. #3
    Beauregard T. Shagnasty Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    ~BD~ wrote:

    > This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
    >
    > http://
    >
    > Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.


    People sort in many ways.

    If you wanted to reply to Foldes, reply to his message, not mine.

    > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    >> And the Tsunami trojan still has nothing to do with HighJackThis.

    >
    > Agreed. I had no intention of making it seem that it had. :-(


    Then why did you copy/paste something entirely irrelevant in this thread?

    > Here are the 'References' from your Header:


    Don't act like you think I don't know how to read headers.

    --
    -bts
    -This space for rent, but the price is high

  4. #4
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    > ~BD~ wrote:
    >
    >> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
    >>
    >> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
    >>
    >> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.

    >
    > People sort in many ways.
    >
    > If you wanted to reply to Foldes, reply to his message, not mine.


    I thought I had. I even started with "Tell me. Peter ..."

    Please explain exactly *how* I should have handled matters differently.

    >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    >>> And the Tsunami trojan still has nothing to do with HighJackThis.

    >>
    >> Agreed. I had no intention of making it seem that it had. :-(

    >
    > Then why did you copy/paste something entirely irrelevant in this thread?


    I have no idea what you are talking about! I scribed, personally, this:-

    Tell me, Peter .....

    If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
    - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
    place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

    Is there any organisation (FBI perhaps?) responsible for checking that
    no such action *is* taken by somebody on one or more of the 'help' sites
    listed?

    I appreciate that getting through a firewall is not a plug-n-play thing
    for script-kiddies; it has to be carefully planned and executed!

    *

    What do you think was copy/pasted?

    >> Here are the 'References' from your Header:

    >
    > Don't act like you think I don't know how to read headers.


    Don't be so aggressive all the time. Be nice! :-)

    --
    Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
    for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
    do unto you."

  5. #5
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source


    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    news:K8idncRWi5LgJN7SnZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
    > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    >> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>
    >>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
    >>>
    >>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
    >>>
    >>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.





    You paranoid dumb Troll. That is not the post that Beauregard T. Shagnasty was
    talking about. Get your eyes straight and then answer correctly and not assume which
    you were not but rather you wanted to solicit an answer to your liking. You are a
    slimy person BD and that will never change.

    Also why you need to crosspost continually is beyond comprehension

    JS


  6. #6
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    Peter Foldes wrote:
    >
    > "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    > news:K8idncRWi5LgJN7SnZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
    >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
    >>> ~BD~ wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
    >>>>
    >>>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
    >>>>
    >>>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.

    >
    >
    >
    >
    > You paranoid dumb Troll. That is not the post that Beauregard T.
    > Shagnasty was talking about.


    Post the Message ID so there can be no doubt!

    > Get your eyes straight and then answer
    > correctly and not assume which you were not but rather you wanted to
    > solicit an answer to your liking. You are a slimy person BD and that
    > will never change.


    So, Tell me Peter ...

    If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
    - would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
    place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

    Is there any organisation (FBI perhaps?) responsible for checking that
    no such action *is* taken by somebody on one or more of the 'help' sites
    listed?

    I appreciate that getting through a firewall is not a plug-n-play thing
    for script-kiddies; it has to be carefully planned and executed!


    > Also why you need to crosspost continually is beyond comprehension
    >
    > JS


    Where I choose to post is no concern of yours.

    --
    Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
    for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
    do unto you."

  7. #7
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    ~BD~ wrote:

    >If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
    >- would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
    >place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?


    You trust no-one online, so just take your computer to the store to
    get fixed.

    Why should people go out of their way to help if all they get is
    unwarranted suspicion as a reward?



  8. #8
    Eagle Guest

    Re: HiJackThis is now Open Source

    ~BD~ used his keyboard to write :
    > Where I choose to post is no concern of yours.


    That's a FACT. PF is some sort of control freak.

    --
    Eagle


    Ham Radio Voice of the wind



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •