HiJackThis is now Open Source

[Dustin]

Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
news:ji9dq3$k14$5@dont-email.me:

> I told him ages ago the places to go if he wanted to encounter 'bad
> guys'. ****er said he was too scared.

I provided him step by step instructions for accesing efnet and undernet
via irc and which channels to immediatly join and hunt. All sorts of real
bad guys there for the pickings. Only one thing, they'll be able to hunt
back.

Apparently he's not into running that mouth if he has to take
responsibility for the things which come out.


--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

[Aardvark]

On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:20:07 -0500, FromTheRafters wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:59:10 -0500, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>
>>> OldGringo38 wrote:
>>>> On 02/20/2012 01:36 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> HijackThis is a free utility that generates an in depth report of
>>>>> registry and file settings from your computer. HijackThis makes no
>>>>> separation between safe and unsafe settings in its scan results
>>>>> giving you the ability to selectively remove items from your
>>>>> machine. In addition to this scan and remove capability HijackThis
>>>>> comes with several tools useful in manually removing malware from a
>>>>> computer.
>>>>>
>>>>> IMPORTANT: HijackThis does not determine what is good or bad. Do not
>>>>> make any changes to your computer settings unless you are an expert
>>>>> computer user.
>>>>>
>>>>> However ......
>>>>>
>>>>> Advanced users can use HijackThis to remove unwanted settings or
>>>>> files.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/hjt/
>>>>>
>>>>> One may then post an HJT report here for some independent guidance:-
>>>>>
>>>>> www.hijackthis.de
>>>>>
>>>>> Any takers?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Is that available for Linux?
>>>>
>>> For working *in* Linux, or for working *on* Linux?
>>
>> Either way, it's pretty pointless. :-)
>>
> Perhaps, but if someone wanted to have it as a tool in a Linux based
> LiveCD toolkit it might be nice to be able to load a hive and look for
> suspicious entries. Such a log having been created would still have the
> same value as a *real* such scan - with an added benefit of getting
> around entries being hidden from HJT by an active so-called rootkit.
>

Good point. Gotcha.

> Linux entries are not centrally located, but could still be scanned for
> known malicious mods - that is - if there were any. Still, even in Linux
> it would be a good idea to scan for such things from a known clean (Live
> CD?) environment.

'Nother good point.



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[G. Morgan]

Dustin wrote:

>Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>news:ji9dq3$k14$5@dont-email.me:
>
>> I told him ages ago the places to go if he wanted to encounter 'bad
>> guys'. ****er said he was too scared.
>
>I provided him step by step instructions for accesing efnet and undernet
>via irc and which channels to immediatly join and hunt. All sorts of real
>bad guys there for the pickings. Only one thing, they'll be able to hunt
>back.
>
>Apparently he's not into running that mouth if he has to take
>responsibility for the things which come out.

<g> Its easier to just make-up terrorists, rather than tracking and
reporting on real ones.

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:

> " ... said he was too scared."

Really? Cite!

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Aardvark]

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 1302 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>
>> " ... said he was too scared."
>
> Really? Cite!

So you say I'm mistaken?

In that case, what is the reason you refuse to go to where the 'bad guys'
hang out, and are *known* to hang out.

<aside> This should be good </aside>



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:01:35 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>news:ji9dq3$k14$5@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> I told him ages ago the places to go if he wanted to encounter 'bad
>>> guys'. ****er said he was too scared.
>>
>>I provided him step by step instructions for accesing efnet and undernet
>>via irc and which channels to immediatly join and hunt. All sorts of
>>real bad guys there for the pickings. Only one thing, they'll be able to
>>hunt back.
>>
>>Apparently he's not into running that mouth if he has to take
>>responsibility for the things which come out.
>
> <g> Its easier to just make-up terrorists, rather than tracking and
> reporting on real ones.

Proves what a ****ing coward he really is, if he'd rather accuse good
folk instead of going after the bad ones, eh?



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 1302 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>> " ... said he was too scared."
>>
>> Really? Cite!
>
> So you say I'm mistaken?
>
> In that case, what is the reason you refuse to go to where the 'bad guys'
> hang out, and are *known* to hang out.
>
> <aside> This should be good</aside>


You *lied*!

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Aardvark]

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:49:07 +0000, Dustin wrote:

> Aardvark <aardvark@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
> news:ji9dq3$k14$5@dont-email.me:
>
>> I told him ages ago the places to go if he wanted to encounter 'bad
>> guys'. ****er said he was too scared.
>
> I provided him step by step instructions for accesing efnet and undernet
> via irc and which channels to immediatly join and hunt. All sorts of
> real bad guys there for the pickings. Only one thing, they'll be able to
> hunt back.
>

Well, that explains everything, eh? Too much of a coward to face up to
the 'bad guys'.

> Apparently he's not into running that mouth if he has to take
> responsibility for the things which come out.

He'll have to one of these days for the **** he's done to the good people
on this clean, shiny end of the interwebs.



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[Aardvark]

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:11:39 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 1302 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>> " ... said he was too scared."
>>>
>>> Really? Cite!
>>
>> So you say I'm mistaken?
>>
>> In that case, what is the reason you refuse to go to where the 'bad
>> guys'
>> hang out, and are *known* to hang out.
>>
>> <aside> This should be good</aside>
>
>
> You *lied*!

Nope. I clearly recall mocking your cowardice at the time. You clearly
said you were too scared to go to the places you'd be *sure* to encounter
the less savoury interwebs denizens.

I didn't lie, ****.

So why wouldn't you go to the list of places Dustin gave you? After all,
you'd definitely get your wish there. Obviously you're more interested in
bugging good people than chasing bad ones, coward.



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:56:42 -0600, G. Morgan wrote:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>I've been called worse, David.
>
> By better.

Again, not saying much for the better ones, eh?

:-)



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)