HiJackThis is now Open Source

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

~BD~ wrote:

> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
>
> http://
>
> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.

People sort in many ways.

If you wanted to reply to Foldes, reply to his message, not mine.

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> And the Tsunami trojan still has nothing to do with HighJackThis.
>
> Agreed. I had no intention of making it seem that it had. :-(

Then why did you copy/paste something entirely irrelevant in this thread?

> Here are the 'References' from your Header:

Don't act like you think I don't know how to read headers.

--
-bts
-This space for rent, but the price is high

[~BD~]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
>>
>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
>>
>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.
>
> People sort in many ways.
>
> If you wanted to reply to Foldes, reply to his message, not mine.

I thought I had. I even started with "Tell me. Peter ..."

Please explain exactly *how* I should have handled matters differently.

>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> And the Tsunami trojan still has nothing to do with HighJackThis.
>>
>> Agreed. I had no intention of making it seem that it had. :-(
>
> Then why did you copy/paste something entirely irrelevant in this thread?

I have no idea what you are talking about! I scribed, personally, this:-

Tell me, Peter .....

If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
- would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

Is there any organisation (FBI perhaps?) responsible for checking that
no such action *is* taken by somebody on one or more of the 'help' sites
listed?

I appreciate that getting through a firewall is not a plug-n-play thing
for script-kiddies; it has to be carefully planned and executed!

*

What do you think was copy/pasted?

>> Here are the 'References' from your Header:
>
> Don't act like you think I don't know how to read headers.

Don't be so aggressive all the time. Be nice! :-)

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:K8idncRWi5LgJN7SnZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
>>>
>>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
>>>
>>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.




You paranoid dumb Troll. That is not the post that Beauregard T. Shagnasty was
talking about. Get your eyes straight and then answer correctly and not assume which
you were not but rather you wanted to solicit an answer to your liking. You are a
slimy person BD and that will never change.

Also why you need to crosspost continually is beyond comprehension

JS

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
>
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:K8idncRWi5LgJN7SnZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is how SeaMonkey presents the thread:
>>>>
>>>> http://i43.tinypic.com/suvpcw.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Forgive me, then, for assuming that you'd be viewing something similar.
>
>
>
>
> You paranoid dumb Troll. That is not the post that Beauregard T.
> Shagnasty was talking about.

Post the Message ID so there can be no doubt!

> Get your eyes straight and then answer
> correctly and not assume which you were not but rather you wanted to
> solicit an answer to your liking. You are a slimy person BD and that
> will never change.

So, Tell me Peter ...

If one logs on to one of the servers you mention above - and 'registers'
- would that not make it relatively easy for a hacker lurking there to
place a 'backdoor' *through* one's firewall?

Is there any organisation (FBI perhaps?) responsible for checking that
no such action *is* taken by somebody on one or more of the 'help' sites
listed?

I appreciate that getting through a firewall is not a plug-n-play thing
for script-kiddies; it has to be carefully planned and executed!


> Also why you need to crosspost continually is beyond comprehension
>
> JS

Where I choose to post is no concern of yours.

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Bullwinkle.]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:KbKdnXoeodeEOt7SnZ2dnUVZ7o2dnZ2d@bt.com...
, a proven liar

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
newst2dnVp4Uffcs73SnZ2dnUVZ8lednZ2d@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree


Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>

Good job I didn't steal it then!

It's 'open source' here on Usenet!

bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DSnZ2dnUVZ8iydnZ2d@bt.com...
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.

OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."

bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on



I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.

[G. Morgan]

Peter Foldes wrote:

>Suggested primary:
>http://www.thespykiller.co.uk/index.php?board=3.0
>
>Suggested secondary:
>http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/forum22.html
>http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/i...hp?showforum=7
>
>Suggested tertiary:
>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/cleanup
>http://www.cybertechhelp.com/forums/...splay.php?f=25
>http://www.atribune.org/forums/index.php?showforum=9
>http://www.geekstogo.com/forum/Malwa..._Here-f37.html
>http://gladiator-antivirus.com/forum...?showforum=170
>http://forum.networktechs.com/forumdisplay.php?f=130
>http://forums.maddoktor2.com/index.php?showforum=17
>http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewforum.php?f=5
>http://forums.spywareinfo.com/index.php?showforum=18
>http://forums.techguy.org/f54-s.html
>http://forums.tomcoyote.org/index.php?showforum=27
>http://forums.subratam.org/index.php?showforum=7
>http://www.5starsupport.com/ipboard/...p?showforum=18
>http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30
>http://makephpbb.com/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=2
>http://forums.techguy.org/54-security/
>http://forums.security-central.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13


Nice list, thanks.

[Bullwinkle.]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:KbKdnXseodfuO97SnZ2dnUVZ7o2dnZ2d@bt.com...

It's rather a shame that this one was forced out of the Navy!

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
newst2dnVp4Uffcs73SnZ2dnUVZ8lednZ2d@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree


Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>

Good job I didn't steal it then!

It's 'open source' here on Usenet!

bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DSnZ2dnUVZ8iydnZ2d@bt.com...
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.

OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."

bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on



I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:59:10 -0500, FromTheRafters wrote:

> OldGringo38 wrote:
>> On 02/20/2012 01:36 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> HijackThis is a free utility that generates an in depth report of
>>> registry and file settings from your computer. HijackThis makes no
>>> separation between safe and unsafe settings in its scan results giving
>>> you the ability to selectively remove items from your machine. In
>>> addition to this scan and remove capability HijackThis comes with
>>> several tools useful in manually removing malware from a computer.
>>>
>>> IMPORTANT: HijackThis does not determine what is good or bad. Do not
>>> make any changes to your computer settings unless you are an expert
>>> computer user.
>>>
>>> However ......
>>>
>>> Advanced users can use HijackThis to remove unwanted settings or
>>> files.
>>>
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/hjt/
>>>
>>> One may then post an HJT report here for some independent guidance:-
>>>
>>> www.hijackthis.de
>>>
>>> Any takers?
>>>
>>>
>> Is that available for Linux?
>>
> For working *in* Linux, or for working *on* Linux?

Either way, it's pretty pointless. :-)



--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)

[~BD~]

G. Morgan wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>
>> Suggested primary:
>> http://www.thespykiller.co.uk/index.php?board=3.0
>>
>> Suggested secondary:
>> http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/forum22.html
>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/i...hp?showforum=7
>>
>> Suggested tertiary:
>> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/cleanup
>> http://www.cybertechhelp.com/forums/...splay.php?f=25
>> http://www.atribune.org/forums/index.php?showforum=9
>> http://www.geekstogo.com/forum/Malwa..._Here-f37.html
>> http://gladiator-antivirus.com/forum...?showforum=170
>> http://forum.networktechs.com/forumdisplay.php?f=130
>> http://forums.maddoktor2.com/index.php?showforum=17
>> http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewforum.php?f=5
>> http://forums.spywareinfo.com/index.php?showforum=18
>> http://forums.techguy.org/f54-s.html
>> http://forums.tomcoyote.org/index.php?showforum=27
>> http://forums.subratam.org/index.php?showforum=7
>> http://www.5starsupport.com/ipboard/...p?showforum=18
>> http://aumha.net/viewforum.php?f=30
>> http://makephpbb.com/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=2
>> http://forums.techguy.org/54-security/
>> http://forums.security-central.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13
>
>
> Nice list, thanks.
>

Which do you trust, Graham?

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[FromTheRafters]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:59:10 -0500, FromTheRafters wrote:
>
>> OldGringo38 wrote:
>>> On 02/20/2012 01:36 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> HijackThis is a free utility that generates an in depth report of
>>>> registry and file settings from your computer. HijackThis makes no
>>>> separation between safe and unsafe settings in its scan results giving
>>>> you the ability to selectively remove items from your machine. In
>>>> addition to this scan and remove capability HijackThis comes with
>>>> several tools useful in manually removing malware from a computer.
>>>>
>>>> IMPORTANT: HijackThis does not determine what is good or bad. Do not
>>>> make any changes to your computer settings unless you are an expert
>>>> computer user.
>>>>
>>>> However ......
>>>>
>>>> Advanced users can use HijackThis to remove unwanted settings or
>>>> files.
>>>>
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/hjt/
>>>>
>>>> One may then post an HJT report here for some independent guidance:-
>>>>
>>>> www.hijackthis.de
>>>>
>>>> Any takers?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Is that available for Linux?
>>>
>> For working *in* Linux, or for working *on* Linux?
>
> Either way, it's pretty pointless. :-)
>
Perhaps, but if someone wanted to have it as a tool in a Linux based
LiveCD toolkit it might be nice to be able to load a hive and look for
suspicious entries. Such a log having been created would still have the
same value as a *real* such scan - with an added benefit of getting
around entries being hidden from HJT by an active so-called rootkit.

Linux entries are not centrally located, but could still be scanned for
known malicious mods - that is - if there were any. Still, even in Linux
it would be a good idea to scan for such things from a known clean (Live
CD?) environment.