~BD~ wrote:
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:eZ-dnb-
>>>> oBa13gNXSnZ2dnUVZ8gCdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>>
>>>>> <shrug> OK - Perhaps you'd find this thread of interest.
>>>>
>>>> I find it rather amusing from a technical aspect. The idea you can
>>>> arbitrarily ban something or someone. Even you know it's an exercise in
>>>> futility. Btw, I provided you an answer to that question previously.
>>>>
>>>> Here it is again.
>>>> magnet:?xt=urn:btih:tnvp32o7yc7bjcm6eu7mmgze7nwyul sp
>>>>
>>>> expand your mind BD.
>>>
>>> OK - I've had a look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet_URI_scheme
>>>
>>>> There is no shame in admitting you're clueless! as to what to do with
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> Message-ID:<Xns9FF9F1423535AHHI2948AJD832@no>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reminder! You are correct. I don't know what to 'do' with
>>> it - but willing to learn should you wish to explain.
>>>
>>> There are *many* things I do not know, Dustin!
>>>
>>> For instance, I do not know why there is no mention whatsoever of
>>> Malwarebytes on this exceptionally detailed page about 'The Parasite
>>> Fight'.
>>>
>>> http://aumha.org/a/parasite.htm Last Updated November 21, 2008
>>
>> Great, another already existent malware term being re-purposed to the
>> confusion of users. Sorry, but to me commercial motivation is not a
>> prerequisite for a malware being parasitic - or being called a parasite.
>
> Your comment appreciated, FTR.
>
> Do you feel that the site is/was *commercially motivated"?
>
No, I think they're trying to do the right thing. I just think that they
could be more original by coming up with *new* term instead of
re-purposing an already extant one. Next they'll be calling everything a
virus - no, wait - they already do. \