Spyware Blaster Database Jan 31 | 2012

[siljaline]

14962 total items in database.
12 new IE CLSID's
*230* new items for Mozilla

I would assume these were released in conjunction with the release of Firefox 10.0

[new user alert]
For those that read these, there are no announcements of updates made anywhere
other than from users than glean the changes when checking for updates.

Silj


--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_

[Buffalo]

siljaline wrote:
> 14962 total items in database.
> 12 new IE CLSID's
> *230* new items for Mozilla
>
> I would assume these were released in conjunction with the release of
> Firefox 10.0
>
> [new user alert]
> For those that read these, there are no announcements of updates made
> anywhere
> other than from users than glean the changes when checking for
> updates.
>
> Silj

Thanks,
Buffalo

[Autumn]

Thanks, Silj.

[siljaline]

FredW wrote:

> Usually there are no items for Mozilla.

True, many question this - I have concluded that Mozilla offers so many third
party extensions and software, the Spyware Blaster folks have deemed Moz
on a lower rung of the priority table. These are just reasonably good assumptions
from the years of having run this software.

> One may wonder why all of a sudden there are so many items for Mozilla.

Certainly the major release of Mozilla 10.0 final spurned to requirement for these
new additions to the database.

Regards,

Silj


--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_

[siljaline]

Autumn wrote:

> Thanks, Silj.

Always more that welcome, Autumn !!

Silj


--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_

[siljaline]

Buffalo wrote:

> Thanks,

You're welcome - it would be interesting to see the boot times of a Moz
browser with the new proctions enabled | disabled.

Silj


--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_

[Charlie]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:02:29 -0500, siljaline wrote:

> 14962 total items in database.
> 12 new IE CLSID's
> *230* new items for Mozilla
>
> I would assume these were released in conjunction with the release of Firefox 10.0
>
> [new user alert]
> For those that read these, there are no announcements of updates made anywhere
> other than from users than glean the changes when checking for updates.
>
> Silj

I saw no new items for Mozilla.

Two PCs using two different OSs, XP and Vista.

Both with 14962 total items in the database.

Work that one out!

[siljaline]

Charlie wrote:

> I saw no new items for Mozilla.

Disable protection and post back what you see for Mozilla.

> Work that one out!

The is a support board for that.

<http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23>

Silj


--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_

[Charlie]

On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 04:16:17 -0500, siljaline wrote:

> Charlie wrote:
>
>> I saw no new items for Mozilla.
>
> Disable protection and post back what you see for Mozilla.
>
>> Work that one out!
>
> The is a support board for that.
>
> <http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23>
>
> Silj
If you have no answer, why bother answering?

It's just rather curious and raises doubts in my mind about what's going on
these days with this application.

[siljaline]

Charlie wrote:

> If you have no answer, why bother answering?

The answer is in the post, read it. Evidently you have not.

Silj


--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_