ACTA: The new threat to the net

[~BD~]

[~BD~]

[~BD~]

[~BD~]

kelly wrote:
> On Jan 30, 11:18 am, ~BD~<~...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> ACTA - a global treaty - could allow corporations to censor the
>> Internet. Negotiated in secret by a small number of rich countries and
>> corporate powers, it would set up a shadowy new anti-counterfeiting body
>> to allow private interests to police everything that we do online and
>> impose massive penalties -- even prison sentences -- against people they
>> say have harmed their business.
>>
>> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>> 500,000 signatures!
>>
>> http://www.avaaz.org/en/eu_save_the_internet/?tta
>>
>> --
>> Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
>> for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
>> do unto you."
>
> I think there are too many hackers out there to let this
> happen...without retaliation. After all, it would be dictatorial. :-)


Have you signed the petition, Kelly?

[Kulin Remailer]

In article <5bcdi7111ecjupg3nv8kcptgs9c9ck7ncv@Osama-is-dead.net>
G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
skipped

> it won't take too much for the citizens to
> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.

Threat reported to Homeland Security Site

[G. Morgan]

Kulin Remailer wrote:

>In article <5bcdi7111ecjupg3nv8kcptgs9c9ck7ncv@Osama-is-dead.net>
>G. Morgan <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>>
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>skipped
>
>> it won't take too much for the citizens to
>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>
>Threat reported to Homeland Security Site


Thanks. I'm sure they will get right on that.

[~BD~]

G. Morgan wrote:
> Kulin Remailer wrote:
>
>> In article<5bcdi7111ecjupg3nv8kcptgs9c9ck7ncv@Osama-is-dead.net>
>> G. Morgan<sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>> skipped
>>
>>> it won't take too much for the citizens to
>>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>>
>> Threat reported to Homeland Security Site
>
>
> Thanks. I'm sure they will get right on that.

*They* don't like 'bad guys' any more than I do!

Best to be straight, honest and true.

IMO

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Dustin]

~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vSnZ2dnUVZ8oKdnZ2d@bt.com:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>
>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same
>> blank post?
>
> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>
> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?

Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
abuse@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice their
displeasure.



--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by,
and the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

[~BD~]

Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vSnZ2dnUVZ8oKdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>
>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same
>>> blank post?
>>
>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>
>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
>> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>
> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
> abuse@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice their
> displeasure.


That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm

Nor in accord with your word.

Better that you took action to eliminate Bullwinkle's activities, in my
opinion.

Btw, I expect you remember this message by Andy Walker
Message-ID: <nep9q1psest1l50gku3v3deedtjee126r8@4ax.com>

https://groups.google.com/group/alt....ain&noredirect

I found the whole thread interesting.

Enjoy your day! :-)

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Bullwinkle.]

50/50 chance you are not the daddy of your wife's two children.

If you are man enough ask you who pleased her all those nights you were not
home,

She will now tell you Bullwinkle if you ask.

Back in the day it was some good **** to!


That was the only reason I stayed pals with a lying scum bag like you.


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news8adnef78NezvLrSnZ2dnUVZ7rOdnZ2d@bt.com...