*****************Crossposting Removed*****************************
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
Why in the ****ing hell did you again add crossposting you friggin Troll
*****************Crossposting Removed*****************************
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
Why in the ****ing hell did you again add crossposting you friggin Troll
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:36:20 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
>>> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
>>
>> That section perfectly covers your recent spamming behaviour. If
>> someone were to collect all the headers of all your 'SPAM' posts and
>> send them with an abuse report to BT, I think you could expect your
>> relationship with them would quickly be at an end.
>>
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%
29#Newsgroup_and_forum>
>>
>> "Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that
>> is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar
>> messages)"
>>
>> Yup, that describes to a tee exactly what you've been doing. I told
>> you a day or two ago.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> @ Aardvark
>
> Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
>
Of course I did, ****.
> He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
> number (again!)
So explain to him why you think it wouldn't be the right thing to do.
Don't come crying to me.
> when he's already given his word that he would not do
> so. He has no honour.
LOL. As if *you* have, ****?
>
> May I suggest that if *you* feel strongly about this, *YOU*, in the best
> interest of everyone posting on Usenet, collect all the headers of all
> my 'SPAM' posts and send them with an abuse report to BT.
Not my job, ****. I'm sure that others are prepared to do that as I type.
>
> It shouldn't take you too long. Are you game?
>
> I'm most interested to see if BT would, actually, dump a loyal customer
> for my terrible misdemeanour.
Well, enough abuse reports should do the trick admirably, ****.
> It certainly bothers me not one jot!
Of course it doesn't, ****.
--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)
"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg9s54$el2$1@dont-email.me...
Aardvark
Watch his crossposting. He added uk.legal which I see that you removed.
JS
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:36:20 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
[...]
> Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
>
> He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
> number (again!) when he's already given his word that he would not do
> so. He has no honour.
I don't recall Dustin promising not to threaten to do anything, could you
cite a MID?
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:17:12 -0500, Peter Foldes wrote:
> "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
> news:jg9s54$el2$1@dont-email.me...
>
> Aardvark
>
> Watch his crossposting.
I do try to do that, sometimes I forget to check.
> He added uk.legal which I see that you removed.
I don't read that group or post there, and as far as I know, neither does
he, therefore it was superfluous.
--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)
Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in
news:jg9ot9$eb1$5@dont-email.me:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:53:20 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>
>> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vSnZ2dnUVZ8oKdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>>
>>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same blank post?
>>>
>>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>>
>>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while
>>> he/she/it persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>>
>> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
>> abuse@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
>> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice
>> their displeasure.
>
> LOL.
>
> How ya doin', Dustin?
>
>
>
im alive.
--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by,
and the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:05:14 +0000, Dustin wrote:
> Aardvark <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in
> news:jg9ot9$eb1$5@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:53:20 +0000, Dustin wrote:
>>
>>> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vSnZ2dnUVZ8oKdnZ2d@bt.com:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>>>
>>>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same blank post?
>>>>
>>>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>>>
>>>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
>>>> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>>>
>>> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
>>> abuse@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
>>> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice
>>> their displeasure.
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>> How ya doin', Dustin?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> im alive.
Well, anything above that is whipped cream on the cherries.
--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)
Of course not, you always are all mouth and no action
when it come to doing something straight up.
That is why bomb building suits you, run and hide.
"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg9s54$el2$1@dont-email.me...
> May I suggest that if *you* feel strongly about this, *YOU*, in the best
> interest of everyone posting on Usenet, collect all the headers of all
> my 'SPAM' posts and send them with an abuse report to BT.
Not my job, ****. I'm sure that others are prepared to do that as I type.
Morgan said he was going to get your BT account closed.
why are you still here??
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:mfydnZ7Udcx58bXSnZ2dnUVZ8rydnZ2d@bt.com...
May I suggest that if *you* feel strongly about this, *YOU*, in the best
interest of everyone posting on Usenet, collect all the headers of all
my 'SPAM' posts and send them with an abuse report to BT.
So mister bomber of UK troops, why don't you do just that.
Like bd you always want somone else to carry the water.
"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jg9pbv$eb1$6@dont-email.me...
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
That section perfectly covers your recent spamming behaviour, ****. If
someone were to collect all the headers of all your 'SPAM' posts and send
them with an abuse report to BT, I think you could expect your
relationship with them would quickly be at an end.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote