50/50 chance you are not the daddy of your wife's two children.
If you are man enough ask you who pleased her all those nights you were not
home,
She will now tell you Bullwinkle if you ask.
Back in the day it was some good **** to!
That was the only reason I stayed pals with a lying scum bag like you.
When are you going to do that?
You never have in the last 20 years
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:792dnVg7FION3brSnZ2dnUVZ8hKdnZ2d@bt.com...
Best to be straight, honest and true.
IMO
What ever happened to your law suit against the 'remailer' jenn basher?
"G. Morgan" <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:i9hei7dn59bpnk6ut18v2q5vrjk76pei7j@Osama-is-dead.net...
~BD~ wrote:
>G. Morgan wrote:
>> Kulin Remailer wrote:
>>
>>> In article<5bcdi7111ecjupg3nv8kcptgs9c9ck7ncv@Osama-is-dead.net>
>>> G. Morgan<sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>> skipped
>>>
>>>> it won't take too much for the citizens to
>>>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
[ moved newsgroups]
>>> Threat reported to Homeland Security Site
>>
>>
>> Thanks. I'm sure they will get right on that.
>
>*They* don't like 'bad guys' any more than I do!
>
>Best to be straight, honest and true.
Agreed, maybe you should adhere to that principle too.
I have nothing to hide, I just bought a rifle last week and passed the
background check. The FBI checks my criminal history regularly due to
being in the security business.
You're an admitted copyright infringer, most recent crime was last week.
You're also a stalker, and the UK is much more stringent when it comes
to that activity.
I got a ticket for making an illegal U-turn about 7 years ago though, so
I guess that makes me "bad" in your book.
> What ever happened to your law suit against the 'remailer' jenn basher?
It's probably still in hand or concluded
--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."
LMAO!!
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:0tqdnR7ALomEV7rSnZ2dnUVZ8l6dnZ2d@bt.com...
> What ever happened to your law suit against the 'remailer' jenn basher?
It's probably still in hand or concluded
On 30/01/2012 16:43, G. Morgan wrote:
> JohnR wrote:
>
>> On 30/01/2012 15:12, G. Morgan wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>>>> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>>>> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>>>> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>>>> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>>>> 500,000 signatures!
>>>
>>> You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer ****ed. You'll
>>> never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
>>> us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
>>>
>>> I called, wrote, and screamed at my representatives. I wrote the White
>>> House. I encouraged all my friends to do the same. With all of our
>>> collective work, especially 'Big' sites like Wikipedia for example, we
>>> have made the issue so toxic for politicians, they won't think of
>>> touching it (especially in an election year).
>>>
>>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>>>
>> Why do you think the power broker crooks weaselled NDAA onto the
>> statute, timed to land on new years eve while most where too busy
>> partying to notice and too hung over to complain the day after!!
>>
>> When a government has become so corrupt and rotten to its core, citizens
>> free to express that fact and challenge it then become a threat and by
>> default terrorists.
>
> Supposedly, it's your duty as an American to point out corruption. Our
> framers of the Union put a clause in the Constitution to protect against
> a rogue government.
>
> The day my government calls me a terrorist for loving my country is the
> day the US as we know it is no more.
>
Country is an alien concept in the corporate plan for global domination,
just arbitrary boundaries. You either love your government and do as
you're told by their corporate sponsors or you're a terrorist.
It hasn't quite come to this yet but it is the road being travelled.
JohnR wrote:
>> The day my government calls me a terrorist for loving my country is the
>> day the US as we know it is no more.
>>
>Country is an alien concept in the corporate plan for global domination,
>just arbitrary boundaries. You either love your government and do as
>you're told by their corporate sponsors or you're a terrorist.
>
>It hasn't quite come to this yet but it is the road being travelled.
Well, you can love your country and still hate its current Government.
Our Constitution is being tested, in both meanings of the word.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:53:20 +0000, Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
> news:dc2dnc9E6IurZ7vSnZ2dnUVZ8oKdnZ2d@bt.com:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:40 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> <NOT A WORD>
>>>
>>> Once was enough. How many times have you made the same blank post?
>>
>> Eye hava know eye deer. :-)
>>
>> I shall respond to Bulltinkle in the same way all the while he/she/it
>> persists in being so sto0pid. OK?
>
> Except this isnt SE... it has a usable charter to quote to
> abuse@btinternet.com for spamming, stalking and disruption. if you
> insist on being a prick ill provide your tele so people may voice their
> displeasure.
LOL.
How ya doin', Dustin?
--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
That section perfectly covers your recent spamming behaviour, ****. If
someone were to collect all the headers of all your 'SPAM' posts and send
them with an abuse report to BT, I think you could expect your
relationship with them would quickly be at an end.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29#Newsgroup_and_forum>
"Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that
is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar messages)"
Yup, that describes to a tee exactly what you've been doing, you sto0pid
****. I told you a day or two ago.
--
"Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved
in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".
-John Donne (1572-1631)
Aardvark wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:07:37 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> That is not in accord with item 2 of the Charter, Dustin.
>> http://shplink.com/misc/FAQ.htm
>
> That section perfectly covers your recent spamming behaviour. If
> someone were to collect all the headers of all your 'SPAM' posts and send
> them with an abuse report to BT, I think you could expect your
> relationship with them would quickly be at an end.
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29#Newsgroup_and_forum>
>
> "Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that
> is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar messages)"
>
> Yup, that describes to a tee exactly what you've been doing. I told you a day or two ago.
>
>
>
@ Aardvark
Perhaps you simply didn't understand what Dustin said? Is that it?
He *threatened* - *threatened* - to publish my personal home telephone
number (again!) when he's already given his word that he would not do
so. He has no honour.
May I suggest that if *you* feel strongly about this, *YOU*, in the best
interest of everyone posting on Usenet, collect all the headers of all
my 'SPAM' posts and send them with an abuse report to BT.
It shouldn't take you too long. Are you game?
I'm most interested to see if BT would, actually, dump a loyal customer
for my terrible misdemeanour. It certainly bothers me not one jot!
--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote