ACTA: The new threat to the net

[G. Morgan]

~BD~ wrote:

>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>
>Are you suggesting something other than through democratic elections?

You may read that anyway you like. Fact is, most of our elected
officials forgot who they work for. I'm not the only one who thinks they
need to be reminded of their place as "public servants", not a exclusive
club to buy and sell legislation to lobbies.

[Bullwinkle.]

awwwwww, tough guy.

Must be on the dope again.

who you gonna threaten this time?


"G. Morgan" <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
newspgdi7hi57lfqhm595upm1j4o83r2a3c41@Osama-is-dead.net...
~BD~ wrote:

>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>
>Are you suggesting something other than through democratic elections?

You may read that anyway you like. Fact is, most of our elected
officials forgot who they work for. I'm not the only one who thinks they
need to be reminded of their place as "public servants", not a exclusive
club to buy and sell legislation to lobbies.

[~BD~]

[~BD~]

G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>>
>> Are you suggesting something other than through democratic elections?
>
> You may read that anyway you like. Fact is, most of our elected
> officials forgot who they work for. I'm not the only one who thinks they
> need to be reminded of their place as "public servants", not a exclusive
> club to buy and sell legislation to lobbies.


I was reading about the last American Civil War recently.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War

Lets hope it doesn't come to that again, eh? <rolls eyes>


--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Bullwinkle.]

Put down the drugs. Seek treatment.

"G. Morgan" <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:5bcdi7111ecjupg3nv8kcptgs9c9ck7ncv@Osama-is-dead.net...

By any means necessary.

[~BD~]

Bullwinkle. needs to put down the drugs. Seek treatment.

--
Dave - "It is much better to be hated for what you are, than to be loved
for what you definitely are not." "Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you."

[Bullwinkle.]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
newst2dnVp4Uffcs73SnZ2dnUVZ8lednZ2d@bt.com...
bd is a Thief:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Brat Girl ... Meditating In The Chinaberry Tree


Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> http://i39.tinypic.com/ortto7.gif
>>
>> I hope this isn't copyright material!
>
> It is.
>
> There's a copyright symbol on Pat Crowley's (and Betty's)
> Brisbee-related and other page/s.
>
>
>

Good job I didn't steal it then!

It's 'open source' here on Usenet!

bd lies:
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:iv-dnSBgl77Q84DSnZ2dnUVZ8iydnZ2d@bt.com...
Mike Easter wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
> A person could claim to tell the truth (for the most part) but sometimes
> lie or tell an 'untruth' or be mistaken or fail to tell the 'whole truth
> and nothing but the truth' by omission.

OK - I'll admit to "fail to tell the 'whole truth and nothing but the
truth' by omission."

bd tries to bully women:
----- Original Message -----
From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: An old friend passes on



I've been more than fair to you, S*******. If you really don't wish to
start afresh in 2012 then be prepared for pain - *real* pain! Your call.

[JohnR]

On 30/01/2012 15:12, G. Morgan wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>> 500,000 signatures!
>
> You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer ****ed. You'll
> never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
> us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
>
> I called, wrote, and screamed at my representatives. I wrote the White
> House. I encouraged all my friends to do the same. With all of our
> collective work, especially 'Big' sites like Wikipedia for example, we
> have made the issue so toxic for politicians, they won't think of
> touching it (especially in an election year).
>
> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>
Why do you think the power broker crooks weaselled NDAA onto the
statute, timed to land on new years eve while most where too busy
partying to notice and too hung over to complain the day after!!

When a government has become so corrupt and rotten to its core, citizens
free to express that fact and challenge it then become a threat and by
default terrorists.

[G. Morgan]

JohnR wrote:

>On 30/01/2012 15:12, G. Morgan wrote:
>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>>> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>>> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>>> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>>> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>>> 500,000 signatures!
>>
>> You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer ****ed. You'll
>> never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
>> us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
>>
>> I called, wrote, and screamed at my representatives. I wrote the White
>> House. I encouraged all my friends to do the same. With all of our
>> collective work, especially 'Big' sites like Wikipedia for example, we
>> have made the issue so toxic for politicians, they won't think of
>> touching it (especially in an election year).
>>
>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>>
>Why do you think the power broker crooks weaselled NDAA onto the
>statute, timed to land on new years eve while most where too busy
>partying to notice and too hung over to complain the day after!!
>
>When a government has become so corrupt and rotten to its core, citizens
>free to express that fact and challenge it then become a threat and by
>default terrorists.

Supposedly, it's your duty as an American to point out corruption. Our
framers of the Union put a clause in the Constitution to protect against
a rogue government.

The day my government calls me a terrorist for loving my country is the
day the US as we know it is no more.

[JohnR]

On 30/01/2012 16:43, G. Morgan wrote:
> JohnR wrote:
>
>> On 30/01/2012 15:12, G. Morgan wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Europe is deciding right now whether to ratify ACTA -- and without them,
>>>> this global attack on Internet freedom will collapse. We know they have
>>>> opposed ACTA before, but some members of Parliament are wavering --
>>>> let's give them the push they need to reject the treaty. Sign the
>>>> petition -- we'll do a spectacular delivery in Brussels when we reach
>>>> 500,000 signatures!
>>>
>>> You have too many freedom-hating people over there, yer ****ed. You'll
>>> never see what happened in the US in the last few months from those of
>>> us opposing SOPA/PIPA.
>>>
>>> I called, wrote, and screamed at my representatives. I wrote the White
>>> House. I encouraged all my friends to do the same. With all of our
>>> collective work, especially 'Big' sites like Wikipedia for example, we
>>> have made the issue so toxic for politicians, they won't think of
>>> touching it (especially in an election year).
>>>
>>> Underlying all that, the part that was not spoken, is much worse for the
>>> government. People are angry, it won't take too much for the citizens to
>>> reclaim their rightful say in government. By any means necessary.
>>>
>> Why do you think the power broker crooks weaselled NDAA onto the
>> statute, timed to land on new years eve while most where too busy
>> partying to notice and too hung over to complain the day after!!
>>
>> When a government has become so corrupt and rotten to its core, citizens
>> free to express that fact and challenge it then become a threat and by
>> default terrorists.
>
> Supposedly, it's your duty as an American to point out corruption. Our
> framers of the Union put a clause in the Constitution to protect against
> a rogue government.
>
> The day my government calls me a terrorist for loving my country is the
> day the US as we know it is no more.
>
Country is an alien concept in the corporate plan for global domination,
just arbitrary boundaries. You either love your government and do as
you're told by their corporate sponsors or you're a terrorist.

It hasn't quite come to this yet but it is the road being travelled.