Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    siljaline Guest

    MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    <paste>

    The MVPS HOSTS file was recently updated [January-18-2012]
    http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm

    Download: hosts.zip (147 kb)
    http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.zip

    How To: Download and Extract the HOSTS file
    http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts2.htm

    HOSTS File - Frequently Asked Questions
    http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hostsfaq.htm

    Note: the "text" version makes a great resource for determining

    possible unwanted connections ...
    http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.txt (596 kb)

    Get notified when the MVPS HOSTS file is updated
    http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/updates.htm

    </paste>

    Silj

    --
    "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
    because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
    -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
    - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_







  2. #2
    Virus Guy Guest

    Re: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    siljaline wrote:

    > The MVPS HOSTS file was recently updated [January-18-2012]


    Is there such a thing as a firefox add-on that aborts any attempt to
    download content from "local host" (ie - 127.0.0.1) ?

    I'm finding that browsing is becoming way to slow when the browser is
    trying to render pages containing lots of blocked domains.

  3. #3
    siljaline Guest

    Re: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    Virus Guy wrote:

    > Is there such a thing as a firefox add-on that aborts any attempt to
    > download content from "local host" (ie - 127.0.0.1) ?


    I am not aware of any Firefox add-ons that would accomplish this.

    You may try >
    <http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hostsfaq.htm#unable>
    See specific instructions for Firefox.

    > I'm finding that browsing is becoming way to slow when the browser is
    > trying to render pages containing lots of blocked domains.


    Set your DNS to manual in Services >
    <http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm#Note>
    A Hosts file larger than 135 kb slows down a Windows PC regardless
    of OS.

    Silj


    --
    "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
    because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
    -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
    - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_


  4. #4
    Dustin Guest

    Re: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    "siljaline" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in news:jf87pl$va2$1@dont-email.me:

    > Virus Guy wrote:
    >
    >> Is there such a thing as a firefox add-on that aborts any attempt to
    >> download content from "local host" (ie - 127.0.0.1) ?

    >
    > I am not aware of any Firefox add-ons that would accomplish this.
    >
    > You may try >
    > <http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hostsfaq.htm#unable>
    > See specific instructions for Firefox.
    >
    >> I'm finding that browsing is becoming way to slow when the browser is
    >> trying to render pages containing lots of blocked domains.

    >
    > Set your DNS to manual in Services >
    > <http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm#Note>
    > A Hosts file larger than 135 kb slows down a Windows PC regardless
    > of OS.


    Much more so under the win9x flavors.



    --
    Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
    many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
    the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

  5. #5
    Virus Guy Guest

    Re: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    Dustin wrote:

    > >> I'm finding that browsing is becoming way to slow when the
    > >> browser is trying to render pages containing lots of blocked
    > >> domains.

    > >
    > > Set your DNS to manual in Services >
    > > <http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm#Note>
    > > A Hosts file larger than 135 kb slows down a Windows PC regardless
    > > of OS.

    >
    > Much more so under the win9x flavors.


    I believe I've read in the past that win-9x is much better able to
    handle large hosts files compared to XP.

  6. #6
    Virus Guy Guest

    Re: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    Virus Guy wrote:

    > Dustin wrote:


    > > > <http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm#Note>
    > > > A Hosts file larger than 135 kb slows down a Windows PC regardless
    > > > of OS.

    > >
    > > Much more so under the win9x flavors.

    >
    > I believe I've read in the past that win-9x is much better able to
    > handle large hosts files compared to XP.


    Heh.

    That line from winhelp2002 that says:

    "Editors Note: in most cases a large HOSTS file (over 135 kb)
    tends to slow down the machine."

    used to read as follows:

    "Editors Note: in most cases a large HOSTS file (over 135 kb)
    tends to slow down the machine. This only occurs in W2000/
    XP/Vista. Windows 98 and ME are not affected."

    It obviously took too much precious space to include references to
    win-9x/me on the winhelp hosts-file page.

    I've been running my win-98 machines for years with hosts files that
    exceed 700/800 kb in size. It's only within the past year that web
    browsing is really getting bogged down by site-blocking caused by hosts
    blocking.

  7. #7
    Dustin Guest

    Re: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    Virus Guy <Virus@Guy.com> wrote in news:4F181AFF.1ACCF5C2@Guy.com:

    > Dustin wrote:
    >
    >> >> I'm finding that browsing is becoming way to slow when the
    >> >> browser is trying to render pages containing lots of blocked
    >> >> domains.
    >> >
    >> > Set your DNS to manual in Services >
    >> > <http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm#Note>
    >> > A Hosts file larger than 135 kb slows down a Windows PC regardless
    >> > of OS.

    >>
    >> Much more so under the win9x flavors.

    >
    > I believe I've read in the past that win-9x is much better able to
    > handle large hosts files compared to XP.


    You should re-read what you thought you read then, as you're wrong on this
    one. Surprise surprise...




    --
    Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
    many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
    the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

  8. #8
    siljaline Guest

    Re: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    Dustin wrote:
    <snipped>

    > Much more so under the win9x flavors.


    The file system on Windows 9 x is not the same Kernel as
    XP on up.

    Regardless of file size on a 9 x PC there should be no noticeable
    slowness. This is moot since no one should be running a 9 x PC these
    days unless it's for running Beta software, otherwise you'd be in the Stoneage.

    Silj


    --
    "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
    because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
    -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
    - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_



  9. #9
    Virus Guy Guest

    Re: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    siljaline wrote:

    > > Much more so under the win9x flavors.

    >
    > The file system on Windows 9 x is not the same Kernel as
    > XP on up.


    I'm not quite sure why you're mixing the term "kernel" with file-system,
    but if you are referring to the 4-GB file-size limitation of FAT32 -
    I'll go out on a limb and say that Win-98 can probably handle most HOSTS
    files regardless of size.

    > Regardless of file size on a 9 x PC there should be no noticeable
    > slowness. This is moot since no one should be running a 9x PC these
    > days unless it's for ...


    Does the taste of Microsoft's koolaid get better with time?

    Oh, sorry, I forgot. NT is made from the finest, most expensive
    threads. I must be the only one that hasn't seen the emperor's new
    clothes.

    Getting back to my original point -

    What's the MVPS policy regarding inclusion of Google's various
    ad-serving and behavior-tracking machines in the MVPS HOSTS file?

    I've added every google host-name I can find to my (arguably dated) copy
    of the MVPS hosts file - while still allowing the basic google search
    page and google-maps to operate that is. I've also added every twitter
    and feacesbook host I can find to completely rid by browser of those
    web-cancers.

    So I guess it's conceivable that my "enhancements" could be why I'm
    seeing increasing bogging while browsing.

  10. #10
    Dustin Guest

    Re: MVPS HOSTS File Update January-18-2012

    "siljaline" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in news:jf9g4q$4oa$1@dont-email.me:

    > Dustin wrote:
    > <snipped>
    >
    >> Much more so under the win9x flavors.

    >
    > The file system on Windows 9 x is not the same Kernel as
    > XP on up.


    I wasn't discussing the file system. Fat32/ntfs have no trouble with a few
    hundred kilobytes. The DNS services however... Aren't so impressed.

    > Regardless of file size on a 9 x PC there should be no noticeable
    > slowness. This is moot since no one should be running a 9 x PC these
    > days unless it's for running Beta software, otherwise you'd be in the
    > Stoneage.


    Again,

    If you have thousands of entries redirected to loopback, it will take your
    box a moment or two to resolve them. (IE: line by line reading on whatever
    domain you enter to compare it to your custom hosts file.) While the
    access time isn't long, it's far from "not noticable" if you have a huge
    file.


    --
    Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
    many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
    the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •