Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: Cnet is accused of bundling malware with downloads

  1. #31
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: Ancient News.... *Dec 06* Re: Cnet is accused of bundling malware with downloads

    Nobody > (Revisited) wrote:

    >CNET has gotten so much **** handed to them over this that they had to
    >fix this, and it appears they did.


    It was one of those things they probably knew was going to be balked at,
    but still made enough $$ to justify a 'temporary' ****ware wrapper. I
    wonder how long they projected it would last before major tech blogs
    zoomed in on it?


  2. #32
    Nobody > (Revisited) Guest

    Re: Ancient News.... *Dec 06* Re: Cnet is accused of bundlingmalware with downloads

    On 1/3/2012 6:56 PM, G. Morgan wrote:
    > Nobody> (Revisited) wrote:
    >
    >> CNET has gotten so much **** handed to them over this that they had to
    >> fix this, and it appears they did.

    >
    > It was one of those things they probably knew was going to be balked at,
    > but still made enough $$ to justify a 'temporary' ****ware wrapper. I
    > wonder how long they projected it would last before major tech blogs
    > zoomed in on it?
    >


    I heard glimmers of their unholy "packing" back in about April 2011, but
    adding the hidden apps didn't hit the streets until August, at least
    big-time.

    2011-08-20 14:27
    https://forum.ultravnc.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=28692

    More links there, too little time.


    --
    "**** this is it, all the pieces do fit.
    We're like that crazy old man jumping
    out of the alleyway with a baseball bat,
    saying, "Remember me mother****er?"
    Jim “Dandy” Mangrum

  3. #33
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: Ancient News.... *Dec 06* Re: Cnet is accused of bundling malware with downloads

    Nobody > (Revisited) wrote:

    >On 1/3/2012 6:56 PM, G. Morgan wrote:
    >> Nobody> (Revisited) wrote:
    >>
    >>> CNET has gotten so much **** handed to them over this that they had to
    >>> fix this, and it appears they did.

    >>
    >> It was one of those things they probably knew was going to be balked at,
    >> but still made enough $$ to justify a 'temporary' ****ware wrapper. I
    >> wonder how long they projected it would last before major tech blogs
    >> zoomed in on it?
    >>

    >
    >I heard glimmers of their unholy "packing" back in about April 2011, but
    >adding the hidden apps didn't hit the streets until August, at least
    >big-time.
    >
    >2011-08-20 14:27
    >https://forum.ultravnc.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=28692
    >
    >More links there, too little time.


    I first noticed it in August by pure chance. I rarely get downloads
    there and just 'got lucky'.




Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •