Don't let them muzzle Google

[David H. Lipman]

From: "Virus Guy" <Virus@Guy.com>

> "David H. Lipman" wrote:
>
>>> Speaking of evil, does google own/operate MarkMonitor?
>>
>> Not that I am aware of.
>
> I ask because they seem to have a very close business relationship. I
> didn't think that can happen for long before google buys you.
>
> I get this nslookup result for trueislam1.com:
>
> FQDN: ghs.l.google.com
> - 209.85.145.121
>
> rDNS on that IP comes back with cbf02m01-in-f121.1e100.net.
>
> Using another DNS server I get 216.239.32.21, which rDNS to
> any-in-2015.1e100.net.
>
> MarkMonitor acts as some sort of holdinging company for domains that
> google acquires. Not sure why google needs such a service - I thought
> google was a domain registrar.

Interesting points - I don't know...


--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Peter Foldes]

"Bullwinkle." <.BDTJ@loa..mo> wrote in message news:4ed773fa$1@news.x-privat.org...

> No, many of your links lead to dangerous places.

How true. He is ignorant to what is safe or unsafe. BD is a clueless Troll who is
very dangerous with his posting of links
The sad part is that he does not realize it .

JS

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> "Bullwinkle." <.BDTJ@loa..mo> wrote in message
> news:4ed773fa$1@news.x-privat.org...
>
>> No, many of your links lead to dangerous places.
>
> How true. He is ignorant to what is safe or unsafe. BD is a clueless
> Troll who is very dangerous with his posting of links
> The sad part is that he does not realize it .
>
> JS


How do *you* determine what is safe or unsafe?

Reproduce ANY dangerous link you believe I've posted in, say, the last
12 months.

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:jb84sa$7oa$2@dont-email.me...
> Peter Foldes wrote:


> Reproduce ANY dangerous link you believe I've posted in, say, the last 12 months

The above sentence shows exactly how dangerous and stupid you are. I and others that
know about computing will not reproduce dangerous links so as to get others
infected or their computer into trouble. You DO NOT reproduce dangerous links even
if obscufiated because it is dangerous to others which you do not take into
consideration. A Troll and a very stupid person you are .

JS

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:jb84sa$7oa$2@dont-email.me...
>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>
>
>> Reproduce ANY dangerous link you believe I've posted in, say, the last
>> 12 months
>
> The above sentence shows exactly how dangerous and stupid you are. I and
> others that know about computing will not reproduce dangerous links so
> as to get others infected or their computer into trouble. You DO NOT
> reproduce dangerous links even if obscufiated because it is dangerous to
> others which you do not take into consideration. A Troll and a very
> stupid person you are .
>
> JS


I just KNEW you'd not be able to do so! :-)

All you needed to do was post a Message ID - nothing dangerous.

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:22:38 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:

> Bear Bottoms wrote:
>> For the sake of Internet freedom, don't let the authorities muzzle
>> Google.
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/n...-judge-orders-
hundreds-of-sites-de-indexed-from-google-twitter-bing-facebook.ars
>>
>>
> Right now, Congress is debating a law that would give them the power to
> censor the world's Internet -- creating a blacklist that could target
> YouTube, WikiLeaks and even groups like Avaaz!
>
> Under the new law, the US could force Internet providers to block any
> website on suspicion of violating copyright or trademark legislation, or
> even failing to sufficiently police their users' activities. And,
> because so much of the Internet's hosts and hardware are located in the
> US, their blacklist would clamp down on the free web for all of us.
>
> The vote could happen at any time now, but we can help stop this --
> champions in Congress want to preserve free speech and tell us that a
> global outcry would strengthen their hand, and one of them -- Senator
> Wyden -- says he will "filibuster" or block any vote on the bill by
> reading out our petition names until the clock runs out! Let's urgently
> raise our voices from every corner of the world to build an
> unprecedented global petition. Click below to sign and then forward to
> everyone:
>
> http://www.avaaz.org/en/save_the_internet/?vl

For once in your miserable life, ****, you're doing something useful.



--
"And thus I clothe my naked villany
With odd old ends stol'n out of holy writ,
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil."
King Richard III (I, iii, 336-338)

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:jb8d1g$230$1@dont-email.me...

> I just KNEW you'd not be able to do so! :-)
>
> All you needed to do was post a Message ID - nothing dangerous.


Well that say's a lot about your knowledge. Read over and over the following very
carefully

**** You do not post links or message ID that have a problem within.You are
spreading your **** to others.You do not expect others to open or pass along a bad
link that I ( BD) posted even if in a test group ******

Now say the following to yourself. " I BD am an idiot for being a Troll and a dumb
arshole "

Now you should fell better

JS

[Bullwinkle.]

LOL Makes him twice as good as you, terrorist scumbag.


"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:jb8fma$ppt$3@dont-email.me...

For once in your miserable life, ****, you're doing something useful.

[~BD~]

ASCII wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>> All you needed to do was post a Message ID - nothing dangerous.
>
> Even an actual link shouldn't be dangerous,
> and if someone is so misconfigured as to have a vulnerability,
> they shouldn't be online in the first place.

Thanks for your input, ASCII!

I agree with you. :-)

[~BD~]

Bullwinkle. wrote:
> LOL Makes him twice as good as you, terrorist scumbag.
>
>
> "Aardvark"<aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
> news:jb8fma$ppt$3@dont-email.me...
>
> For once in your miserable life, you're doing something useful.

Just once in a while, Moose gets something right! :-)