Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 77

Thread: Researcher says seeing is believing

  1. #21
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:jbfqq6$u08$1@dont-email.me...
    > Peter Foldes wrote:
    >> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    >> news:jb5r0q$f9h$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    >>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    >>> news:jb5nug$atn$1@dont-email.me...

    >>
    >>>>> You claim an association with MI5
    >>>>
    >>>> *Cite*! (I'll wager you cannot!)

    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Found it you ******* and see below. Keep up your stoopid Trolling why
    >> don't you
    >>
    >>> I've mentioned before that because of my 20+ years of active service in
    >>> the Royal Navy I qualified for continuing service with MI5 (rather like
    >>> 007) but decided to help on a non-contractual basis without accepting
    >>> further Government funds. I do, though, keep in close contact with 'the
    >>> authorities'

    >
    >
    > It appears that you, just like Bullwinkle, have a reading comprehension problem,
    > Peter Foldes!
    >
    > Nowhere in that post does it imply that which you claimed - "You posted that you
    > work for MI5 as a temporary employee".
    >
    > For your interest, 'employees' are *paid* by an employer!





    No misunderstanding what you wrote. Try not to get out of it or try as you are now
    putting a spin on it.

    It is as I posted and there is no misunderstanding on this end. You said you work
    with MI5 and it say's so in that post

    JS


  2. #22
    Bullwinkle. Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing

    Is it not odd that you and your bud, who built bombs to kill UK troops,
    both got busy and went off line together?

    Hmmmmmm, a real chin rubber that is.

    What are you two up to now??

    You are a punk ass rat and no more.

    Even in the Navy you hid behind others especially women.

    You were reading post just afraid to post as all your personal info
    is on test for all to see.

    I know why you were Forced to 'volunteer' to leave the navy.
    You are the lowest of scum bag punk ass rats.

    Just remember:

    I broke bread with you.
    I broke bread with you and the Mrs.
    I broke bread with the Mrs.


    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    news:jbfqq6$u08$1@dont-email.me...
    Peter Foldes wrote:
    > "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:jb5r0q$f9h$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    >> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    >> news:jb5nug$atn$1@dont-email.me...

    >
    >>>> You claim an association with MI5
    >>>
    >>> *Cite*! (I'll wager you cannot!)

    >
    >
    >
    > Found it you ******* and see below. Keep up your stoopid Trolling why
    > don't you
    >
    >> I've mentioned before that because of my 20+ years of active service in
    >> the Royal Navy I qualified for continuing service with MI5 (rather like
    >> 007) but decided to help on a non-contractual basis without accepting
    >> further Government funds. I do, though, keep in close contact with 'the
    >> authorities'



    It appears that you, just like Bullwinkle, have a reading comprehension
    problem, Peter Foldes!

    Nowhere in that post does it imply that which you claimed - "You posted
    that you work for MI5 as a temporary employee".

    For your interest, 'employees' are *paid* by an employer!

    Study here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment


  3. #23
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing

    Peter Foldes wrote:
    > "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    > news:jbfqq6$u08$1@dont-email.me...
    >> Peter Foldes wrote:
    >>> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    >>> news:jb5r0q$f9h$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    >>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    >>>> news:jb5nug$atn$1@dont-email.me...
    >>>
    >>>>>> You claim an association with MI5
    >>>>>
    >>>>> *Cite*! (I'll wager you cannot!)
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Found it you ******* and see below. Keep up your stoopid Trolling why
    >>> don't you
    >>>
    >>>> I've mentioned before that because of my 20+ years of active service in
    >>>> the Royal Navy I qualified for continuing service with MI5 (rather like
    >>>> 007) but decided to help on a non-contractual basis without accepting
    >>>> further Government funds. I do, though, keep in close contact with 'the
    >>>> authorities'

    >>
    >>
    >> It appears that you, just like Bullwinkle, have a reading
    >> comprehension problem, Peter Foldes!
    >>
    >> Nowhere in that post does it imply that which you claimed - "You
    >> posted that you work for MI5 as a temporary employee".
    >>
    >> For your interest, 'employees' are *paid* by an employer!

    >
    >
    >
    >
    > No misunderstanding what you wrote. Try not to get out of it or try as
    > you are now putting a spin on it.
    >
    > It is as I posted and there is no misunderstanding on this end. You said
    > you work with MI5 and it say's so in that post



    Nope! :-)

    As I said - a comprehension problem at *your* end, Mr Foldes!

    As FromTheRafters once said, "Dave is generally very careful with words.
    ;o)"

    https://groups.google.com/group/alt....002c0f55?hl=en

    --
    Dave - but there's no way of knowing, for sure, is there?!! ;-)

  4. #24
    Bullwinkle. Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing

    He is no more creditable than you or anyone else that supports you.

    Like you he Lies!


    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    news:jbg041$rag$1@dont-email.me...

    As FromTheRafters once said, "Dave is generally very careful with words.
    ;o)"



  5. #25
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing

    Bullwinkle. wrote:
    > He is no more creditable than you or anyone else that supports you.
    >
    > Like you he Lies!



    I've *never* caught FTR out in any kind of lie.

    IMO, he's a good guy! :-)

    (I think! <vbg>)

  6. #26
    Bullwinkle. Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing

    that is because your lying eyes are blind.


    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    news:jbgk65$tpp$1@dont-email.me...
    Bullwinkle. wrote:
    > He is no more creditable than you or anyone else that supports you.
    >
    > Like you he Lies!



    I've *never* caught FTR out in any kind of lie.

    IMO, he's a good guy! :-)

    (I think! <vbg>)


  7. #27
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing

    Peter Foldes wrote:

    >No misunderstanding what you wrote. Try not to get out of it or try as you are now
    >putting a spin on it.
    >
    >It is as I posted and there is no misunderstanding on this end. You said you work
    >with MI5 and it say's so in that post


    Bull**** !!!

    >>> I've mentioned before that because of my 20+ years of active service in
    >>> the Royal Navy I qualified for continuing service with MI5 (rather like
    >>> 007) but decided to help on a non-contractual basis without accepting
    >>> further Government funds. I do, though, keep in close contact with 'the
    >>> authorities'


    Nowhere above did he say he worked for MI5, he specifically said he
    didn't.

    Now we argue about what "decided to help" means.


    --

    "I don't like to discriminate against terrorists based on nationality.
    If you declare war on the United States and you want to kill us,
    We're going to kill you first, period."

    October 19, 2011 - Ali Soufan (Colbert Report)



  8. #28
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing


    "G. Morgan" <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
    news:mesnd79k2l56ale958jvjtn9vpm9onaf21@Osama-is-dead.net...


    >>> but decided to help on a non-contractual basis without accepting further
    >>> Government funds.



    WTF does the above mean in English and not in Texas English. Sheeesh you really
    want to Troll me don't you Morgan. Tell me who did the ******* mean with the above
    when he said .

    Like I said previously that you are as dumb as BD help on a non-contractual basis.
    Help who?? Dumb ass you are.

    JS


  9. #29
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing

    Peter Foldes wrote:

    >>>> but decided to help on a non-contractual basis without accepting further
    >>>> Government funds.


    >WTF does the above mean in English and not in Texas English.


    LMFAO... this is coming from someone who pecks out pidgin English!

    >Sheeesh you really
    >want to Troll me don't you Morgan.


    When I'm bored, sure. You always take any bait I chunk out there. I
    thought you had me killfiled though? Obviously you don't, so that means
    one of two things:

    1. You lied and never KF'ed me
    2. You're to stupid to find the 'block sender' button in MSOLE.

    >Tell me who did the ******* mean with the above
    >when he said .


    Ask him yourself, dip****.

    >Like I said previously that you are as dumb as BD help on a non-contractual basis.


    What? That is not a sentence. Your English sucks.

    >Help who??


    In context, that would be MI5 (the way it was written)..

    >Dumb ass you are.


    Says the (alleged) Microsoft MVP that can't even fix...

    >
    >JS


    A signature delimiter.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_block
    The formatting of the sig block is prescribed somewhat more firmly: it
    should be displayed as plain text in a fixed-width font (no HTML,
    images, or other rich text), and must be delimited from the body of the
    message by a single line consisting of exactly two hyphens, followed by
    a space, followed by the end of line (i.e., "-- \n").[1] This latter
    prescription, which goes by many names, including "sig dashes",
    "signature cut line", "sig-marker", and "sig separator", allows software
    to automatically mark or remove the sig block as the receiver desires.
    The signature prefix chosen can be different for different people
    serving as a distinguishing feature of their signatures. A correct
    delimiter is required for a news posting program to receive the Good
    Netkeeping Seal of Approval.
    --

    "I don't like to discriminate against terrorists based on nationality.
    If you declare war on the United States and you want to kill us,
    We're going to kill you first, period."

    October 19, 2011 - Ali Soufan (Colbert Report)



  10. #30
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: Researcher says seeing is believing

    Peter Foldes wrote:
    >
    > "G. Morgan" <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
    > news:mesnd79k2l56ale958jvjtn9vpm9onaf21@Osama-is-dead.net...
    >
    >
    >>>> but decided to help on a non-contractual basis without accepting
    >>>> further Government funds.

    >
    >
    > WTF does the above mean in English and not in Texas English. Sheeesh you
    > really want to Troll me don't you Morgan. Tell me who did the *******
    > mean with the above when he said .
    >
    > Like I said previously that you are as dumb as BD help on a
    > non-contractual basis. Help who?? Dumb ass you are.
    >
    > JS



    Tell me, Peter Foldes, about your friend/colleague Robear Dyer (aka
    PABear). On this page ....

    https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/pr...556E#Languages

    It says "MS MVP since October 2002 and a "jack of all trades", my
    primary focus is Security (including Windows Updates). I offer private
    support to home and small business clients."

    To me, that sounds as if he runs a computer business!

    However, on *this* page http://aumha.org/vsop.htm he says ....

    "I’m sales director at a local Pennsylvania vineyard, a fine-dining and
    wine consultant, and sing professionally (classical bass) in the
    Philadelphia area, Maine, and the Spoleto (Italy) summer festival."

    They appear incongruous. Which description is correct, please?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •