FromTheRafters wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>>> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>>>>>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>>>>>
>>>>> You are Trolling again BD
>>>>
>>>> No - not at all!
>>>>
>>>> *You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with the
>>>> family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft installed
>>>> and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use and I
>>>> really
>>>> do not need anything else on it."
>>>>
>>>> *David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
>>>> workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."
>>>>
>>>> The two statements are incongruous. <shrug>
>>>
>>> Not really. The term "server" can refer both to the software and to the
>>> role of the machine.
>>
>>
>> I have read here and do understand what you say, FTR.
>> http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/server.html
>>
>> Maybe you can help me understand why it is apparently OK to protect a
>> 'home' server but unnecessary to protect what PF calls a 'work' server?
>
> What (and how many) new programs are you likely going to run?

None envisaged!

>> We can chat on scorched-earth rather than here if you would prefer that.
>
> Nope, and I told everyone why.

OK. Your choice!

Btw, here's another piccie for you, from a different angle:-

http://i42.tinypic.com/ezn4vm.jpg