Spyblaster on Win 7

[David H. Lipman]

From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>

> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>
>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>>>>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>>>>
>>>> You are Trolling again BD
>>>
>>> No - not at all!
>>>
>>> *You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with the
>>> family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft installed
>>> and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use and I really
>>> do not need anything else on it."
>>>
>>> *David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
>>> workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."
>>>
>>> The two statements are incongruous. <shrug>
>>
>> You surely lack comprehension skills.
>
> Sometimes - especially when the 'teacher' is not providing a clear explanation.
>
>> The operating text in what Peter posted was... "The 2 other servers
>> which _I use for home_..." says volumes.
>
> I understand that different servers do different jobs, from serving e-mail and video to
> protecting internal networks and hosting Web sites.
>
> DHL did not differentiate when he made this statement:-
>
> "Howerver they are server platforms and that software shouldn't be installed on a
> Server."
>
> One never can tell the skill level of folk reading here! Never assume, check!
>

You are a troll, plain and simple. This is the last reply (and acronyms will not be
explained)....

You do NOT install such software on a server. It has a important role to play in an AD
Domain. However, if a Server Platform is used at home it is NOT in that role, per se, and
one can do whatever one chooses simply because it doesn't have the affect on a large
population of OU users.



--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[~BD~]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>
>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>
>>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>>> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>>>>>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>>>>>
>>>>> You are Trolling again BD
>>>>
>>>> No - not at all!
>>>>
>>>> *You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with the
>>>> family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft installed
>>>> and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use and I really
>>>> do not need anything else on it."
>>>>
>>>> *David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
>>>> workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."
>>>>
>>>> The two statements are incongruous.<shrug>
>>>
>>> You surely lack comprehension skills.
>>
>> Sometimes - especially when the 'teacher' is not providing a clear explanation.
>>
>>> The operating text in what Peter posted was... "The 2 other servers
>>> which _I use for home_..." says volumes.
>>
>> I understand that different servers do different jobs, from serving e-mail and video to
>> protecting internal networks and hosting Web sites.
>>
>> DHL did not differentiate when he made this statement:-
>>
>> "Howerver they are server platforms and that software shouldn't be installed on a
>> Server."
>>
>> One never can tell the skill level of folk reading here! Never assume, check!
>>
>
> You are a troll, plain and simple. This is the last reply (and acronyms will not be
> explained)....
>
> You do NOT install such software on a server. It has a important role to play in an AD
> Domain. However, if a Server Platform is used at home it is NOT in that role, per se, and
> one can do whatever one chooses simply because it doesn't have the affect on a large
> population of OU users.


What you say is explained here:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Directory

You are probably well aware of all the information therein. I was not!

[Bullwinkle.]

Well if you already knew why did you ask?

****wit TROOLL.


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:jb5a8b$gb7$1@dont-email.me...

What you say is explained here:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Directory

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:jb4nnp$b8f$1@dont-email.me...

> Maybe you can help me understand why it is apparently OK to protect a 'home'
> server but unnecessary to protect what PF calls a 'work' server?

You screwed up dumb Troll. The protection for a working server is completely
different than that of a what you call a home server. Everything explained to you is
like talking into the wind .

I will not explain it you AGAIN after having it explained to you numerous times over
time.

JS

[Peter Foldes]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:jb5a8b$gb7$1@dont-email.me...

> What you say is explained here:-
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Directory
>
> You are probably well aware of all the information therein. I was not!

Not everything is explained to you in Wiki. They are wrong many times or they oblete
to say many things.

Do you know the difference between an AC or DC server. You are a Troll and a
complete fool BD

JS

[Bullwinkle.]

bd believe the difference is one is a switch hitter!


"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jb5oep$89j$1@speranza.aioe.org...

Do you know the difference between an AC or DC server. You are a Troll and a
complete fool BD

JS

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:51:01 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:

> One never can tell the skill level of folk reading here!

Translation: I'm computer sto0pid.



--
"And thus I clothe my naked villany
With odd old ends stol'n out of holy writ,
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil."
King Richard III (I, iii, 336-338)

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:58:45 +0000, ~BD~ wrote:

> Maybe you can help me understand why it is apparently OK to protect a
> 'home' server but unnecessary to protect what PF calls a 'work' server?

Who said that, ****?



--
"And thus I clothe my naked villany
With odd old ends stol'n out of holy writ,
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil."
King Richard III (I, iii, 336-338)

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:21:42 -0500, David H. Lipman wrote:

> From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>
>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>
>>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>>> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft
>>>>>> MVP.
>>>>>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>>>>>
>>>>> You are Trolling again BD
>>>>
>>>> No - not at all!
>>>>
>>>> *You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with
>>>> the family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft
>>>> installed and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use
>>>> and I really do not need anything else on it."
>>>>
>>>> *David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
>>>> workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."
>>>>
>>>> The two statements are incongruous. <shrug>
>>>
>>> You surely lack comprehension skills.
>>
>> Sometimes - especially when the 'teacher' is not providing a clear
>> explanation.
>>
>>> The operating text in what Peter posted was... "The 2 other servers
>>> which _I use for home_..." says volumes.
>>
>> I understand that different servers do different jobs, from serving
>> e-mail and video to protecting internal networks and hosting Web sites.
>>
>> DHL did not differentiate when he made this statement:-
>>
>> "Howerver they are server platforms and that software shouldn't be
>> installed on a Server."
>>
>> One never can tell the skill level of folk reading here! Never assume,
>> check!
>>
>>
> You are a troll, plain and simple. This is the last reply (and acronyms
> will not be explained)....
>
> You do NOT install such software on a server. It has a important role
> to play in an AD Domain. However, if a Server Platform is used at home
> it is NOT in that role, per se, and one can do whatever one chooses
> simply because it doesn't have the affect on a large population of OU
> users.

I run Klamav on my LAMP (and other applications) server here. Basically,
just for the hell of it, but generally in case someone running Windoze
connects to it..



--
"And thus I clothe my naked villany
With odd old ends stol'n out of holy writ,
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil."
King Richard III (I, iii, 336-338)

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:21:42 -0500, David H. Lipman wrote:
[....]
> I run Klamav on my LAMP (and other applications) server here. Basically,
> just for the hell of it, but generally in case someone running Windoze
> connects to it..

Translation: I'm computer sto0pid.

Perhaps you really mean Clamav? http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/

Dopey! ;-)