From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>

> David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>
>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>>>>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>>>>
>>>> You are Trolling again BD
>>>
>>> No - not at all!
>>>
>>> *You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with the
>>> family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft installed
>>> and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use and I really
>>> do not need anything else on it."
>>>
>>> *David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
>>> workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."
>>>
>>> The two statements are incongruous. <shrug>
>>
>> You surely lack comprehension skills.
>
> Sometimes - especially when the 'teacher' is not providing a clear explanation.
>
>> The operating text in what Peter posted was... "The 2 other servers
>> which _I use for home_..." says volumes.
>
> I understand that different servers do different jobs, from serving e-mail and video to
> protecting internal networks and hosting Web sites.
>
> DHL did not differentiate when he made this statement:-
>
> "Howerver they are server platforms and that software shouldn't be installed on a
> Server."
>
> One never can tell the skill level of folk reading here! Never assume, check!
>

You are a troll, plain and simple. This is the last reply (and acronyms will not be
explained)....

You do NOT install such software on a server. It has a important role to play in an AD
Domain. However, if a Server Platform is used at home it is NOT in that role, per se, and
one can do whatever one chooses simply because it doesn't have the affect on a large
population of OU users.



--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp