Spyblaster on Win 7

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "Peter Foldes"<okf22@hotmail.com>
> `
>> I've not recognised anything that supports your view that software
>> should not be installed on a server. Please will you supply some
>> further advice about this, Mr Lipman?
>>
>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>
>
> BD
>
> David is correct with his post. On a working Server you need an AV and
> other Malware for specialized protection that is not listed in any of
> the posts here. The only reason that I mentioned it to Silj's post was
> to let all know that it does work on a server but like David posted it
> should not be installed on a WORKING Server on account that it will not
> cover the full scope of the server.
> Before anyone mentions to the latter (full scope ) I posted it in layman
> terms for BD to understand. Explaining the full reasoning behind it to
> BD will cause him to mis-understand or fully not understand the complete
> factual details.
>
> JS


Perhaps you'll re-read what you have just posted - then correct same?!!!

[VanguardLH]

Jackson wrote:

> Does it work on Win 7? Are there any special moves when
> installing it on Win 7?

There is goodware known as SpywareBlaster. That is NOT what you
identified in the Subject of your post. SpyBlaster is rogueware.

http://www.emsisoft.com/en/malware/?...n32.Spyblaster

[~BD~]

VanguardLH wrote:
> Jackson wrote:
>
>> Does it work on Win 7? Are there any special moves when
>> installing it on Win 7?
>
> There is goodware known as SpywareBlaster. That is NOT what you
> identified in the Subject of your post. SpyBlaster is rogueware.
>
> http://www.emsisoft.com/en/malware/?...n32.Spyblaster


IAWTP

[~BD~]

Peter Foldes wrote:
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>
>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>
> You are Trolling again BD

No - not at all!

*You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with the
family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft installed
and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use and I really
do not need anything else on it."

*David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."

The two statements are incongruous. <shrug>

[David H. Lipman]

From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>

| Peter Foldes wrote:
>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>>
>> You are Trolling again BD
|
| No - not at all!
|
| *You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with the
| family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft installed
| and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use and I really
| do not need anything else on it."
|
| *David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
| workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."
|
| The two statements are incongruous. <shrug>

You surely lack comprehension skills.

The operating text in what Peter posted was... "The 2 other servers which _I
use for home_..." says volumes.

--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[FromTheRafters]

~BD~ wrote:
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>>
>> You are Trolling again BD
>
> No - not at all!
>
> *You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with the
> family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft installed
> and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use and I really
> do not need anything else on it."
>
> *David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
> workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."
>
> The two statements are incongruous. <shrug>

Not really. The term "server" can refer both to the software and to the
role of the machine.

[~BD~]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>
> | Peter Foldes wrote:
>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>>>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>>>
>>> You are Trolling again BD
> |
> | No - not at all!
> |
> | *You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with the
> | family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft installed
> | and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use and I really
> | do not need anything else on it."
> |
> | *David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
> | workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."
> |
> | The two statements are incongruous. <shrug>
>
> You surely lack comprehension skills.

Sometimes - especially when the 'teacher' is not providing a clear
explanation.

> The operating text in what Peter posted was... "The 2 other servers
> which _I use for home_..." says volumes.

I understand that different servers do different jobs, from serving
e-mail and video to protecting internal networks and hosting Web sites.

DHL did not differentiate when he made this statement:-

"Howerver they are server platforms and that software shouldn't be
installed on a Server."

One never can tell the skill level of folk reading here! Never assume,
check!

[~BD~]

FromTheRafters wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>> news:jb33aa$vs2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>> Peter Foldes professes to be a computer guru and an ex-Microsoft MVP.
>>>> He'd surely be aware of what you claim - you can't both be right!
>>>
>>> You are Trolling again BD
>>
>> No - not at all!
>>
>> *You* said "The 2 other servers which I use for home use along with the
>> family I have SpywareBlaster, SAS, Malwarebytes and Emisoft installed
>> and running and those 2 machines are basically for home use and I really
>> do not need anything else on it."
>>
>> *David Lipman* said ""Browsing" that can get a user into trouble on a
>> workstation should *never* be done on a server platform ..."
>>
>> The two statements are incongruous. <shrug>
>
> Not really. The term "server" can refer both to the software and to the
> role of the machine.


I have read here and do understand what you say, FTR.
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/server.html

Maybe you can help me understand why it is apparently OK to protect a
'home' server but unnecessary to protect what PF calls a 'work' server?

We can chat on scorched-earth rather than here if you would prefer that.

[Bullwinkle.]

TROLL!!


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:jb4nnp$b8f$1@dont-email.me...

We can chat on scorched-earth rather than here if you would prefer that.

[Bullwinkle.]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZR33po0RPM



"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:jb4nnp$b8f$1@dont-email.me...

Maybe you can help me understand why it is apparently OK to protect a
'home' server but unnecessary to protect what PF calls a 'work' server?

We can chat on scorched-earth rather than here if you would prefer that.