Feds shutter DNS malware scam that infected 4 million PCs

[~BD~]

David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Nobody> (Revisited)"<usenetharvested@aol.com>
>
>> On 11/11/2011 4:28 PM, David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "Nobody> (Revisited)"<usenetharvested@aol.com>
>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2011 2:37 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> If you *knew* the organisation was 'crooked to the core', did you report
>>>>> the fact to the appropriate authorities? If so, how long ago?
>>>>>
>>>>> If not, why not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just wondering. Others reading here might be wondering too!
>>>>> Hey dip****....
>>>>> Read the writeups on how long the authorities and other
> organizations |>> have been working this.
>>>>> Many of us have been involved for years on this one. We don't do it
>>>> here, there are a number of private forums and networks devoted to |
>>> tracking this crap.
>>>>> Mr. Lipman and I do see each other in those (waves, Dave).
>>>>> You are just pissed off because none of them will let *you* in.
>>>>
>>> Dave waves back... ;-)
>>>
>>
>> Yup...
>>
>> If BoaTurd Doofis truly knew even 5% of the real crap that's going on on the net, he'd
>> dump his pooter, his cellphone, cancel all his credit cards, smash his TV, rip the
>> landline phone out, and go try to convince a monastery to take him in.
>>
>
>
> For sure !


It seems likely that the internet will remain in its Gold Rush phase for
some time yet. And in the crevices and corners of its slightly
thrown-together structures, darknets and other private online
environments will continue to flourish. They can be inspiring places to
spend time in, full of dissidents and eccentrics and the Internet's
original free-wheeling spirit. But a darknet is not always somewhere for
the squeamish.

On Freenet, there is a currently a "freesite" which makes allegations
against supposed paedophiles, complete with names, photographs,
extensive details of their lives online, and partial home addresses. In
much smaller type underneath runs the disclaimer: "The material
contained in this freesite is hearsay . . . It is not admissible in
court proceedings and would certainly not reach the burden of proof
requirement of a criminal trial." For the time being, when I'm wandering
around online, I may stick to Google.

*

A good article here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...ternet-freenet

[Bullwinkle.]

Care to explain to the folks here what the action
was going to be if you did not "volunteer" to leave the
Navey when you did?

You were/are a very sick/odd Freak

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j9lr8v$di$1@dont-email.me...
David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Nobody> (Revisited)"<usenetharvested@aol.com>
>
>> On 11/11/2011 4:28 PM, David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "Nobody> (Revisited)"<usenetharvested@aol.com>
>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2011 2:37 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> If you *knew* the organisation was 'crooked to the core', did you
>>>>> report
>>>>> the fact to the appropriate authorities? If so, how long ago?
>>>>>
>>>>> If not, why not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just wondering. Others reading here might be wondering too!
>>>>> Hey dip****....
>>>>> Read the writeups on how long the authorities and other
> organizations |>> have been working this.
>>>>> Many of us have been involved for years on this one. We don't do it
>>>> here, there are a number of private forums and networks devoted to |
>>> tracking this crap.
>>>>> Mr. Lipman and I do see each other in those (waves, Dave).
>>>>> You are just pissed off because none of them will let *you* in.
>>>>
>>> Dave waves back... ;-)
>>>
>>
>> Yup...
>>
>> If BoaTurd Doofis truly knew even 5% of the real crap that's going on on
>> the net, he'd
>> dump his pooter, his cellphone, cancel all his credit cards, smash his
>> TV, rip the
>> landline phone out, and go try to convince a monastery to take him in.
>>
>
>
> For sure !


It seems likely that the internet will remain in its Gold Rush phase for
some time yet. And in the crevices and corners of its slightly
thrown-together structures, darknets and other private online
environments will continue to flourish. They can be inspiring places to
spend time in, full of dissidents and eccentrics and the Internet's
original free-wheeling spirit. But a darknet is not always somewhere for
the squeamish.

On Freenet, there is a currently a "freesite" which makes allegations
against supposed paedophiles, complete with names, photographs,
extensive details of their lives online, and partial home addresses. In
much smaller type underneath runs the disclaimer: "The material
contained in this freesite is hearsay . . . It is not admissible in
court proceedings and would certainly not reach the burden of proof
requirement of a criminal trial." For the time being, when I'm wandering
around online, I may stick to Google.

*

A good article here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...ternet-freenet

[~BD~]

Bullwinkle. wrote:
> Care to explain to the folks here what the action
> was going to be if you did not "volunteer" to leave the
> Royal Navy when you did?

Sure!

I'd have continued serving until my 50th birthday.

[Bullwinkle.]

You were forced to leave when you did, why is that?


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j9ntkd$c8m$1@dont-email.me...
Bullwinkle. wrote:
> Care to explain to the folks here what the action
> was going to be if you did not "volunteer" to leave the
> Royal Navy when you did?

Sure!

I'd have continued serving until my 50th birthday.

[~BD~]

Bullwinkle. wrote:
> You were forced to leave when you did, why is that?


I most certainly was *not* forced to leave! BD was a volunteer!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Defence_White_Paper

A good read on this special day. Here's a short extract:-

*

We were heading for war...and the Commons blamed me
By John Nott12:00AM GMT 14 Mar 2002

My visit was an emotional occasion. Unknown to the press, when I had
visited the same port less than a year earlier I had been besieged by
rioting dockyard workers, protesting about defence cuts and
redundancies. As soon as I had opened my mouth to speak, a hail of metal
bolts and other dangerous missiles had been hurled in my direction,
shattering the glass of several windows and doors. Amazingly, nothing
struck me. Hampshire police were called in, and when I left in a coach,
the men hurled more missiles at it, leaving several officials covered in
shattered glass.

This time, as I was about to go on board HMS Hermes, I saw a group of
the same workers standing on the dockside. I went up to speak to them.
For me, this was one of the most poignant memories of the whole
Falklands affair, because these were the very men whom I was putting out
of work. Several had received their redundancy notices a few days
before; but in spite of that, they'd all rallied round, working day and
night. I must have been a real nightmare to them.

However, although I had been in the centre of a very emotional row about
the future of the Royal Navy over the preceding six to nine months, and
although there must have been a number of sailors on board Hermes who
felt that I was responsible for having taken totally wrong decisions,
none of this came out at all during my visit.

I sensed that these naval officers and dockyard workers did not see me
as a visiting politician now, but acknowledged that I was there as the
Defence Secretary; that the nation had a crisis; and that we just had to
work together to put on a good show. It shows how much this country does
come together in times of crisis, and in a quite astonishing way.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/4...blamed-me.html

[Bullwinkle.]

What was going to be the action taken against you
if you did not "vlounteer" to leave?

Freak.


TwoifbyTea


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j9o9pa$ao4$1@dont-email.me...
Bullwinkle. wrote:
> You were forced to leave when you did, why is that?


I most certainly was *not* forced to leave! BD was a volunteer!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Defence_White_Paper

A good read on this special day. Here's a short extract:-

<snip distraction>