David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Nobody> (Revisited)"<usenetharvested@aol.com>
>
>> On 11/11/2011 4:28 PM, David H. Lipman wrote:
>>> From: "Nobody> (Revisited)"<usenetharvested@aol.com>
>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2011 2:37 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> If you *knew* the organisation was 'crooked to the core', did you report
>>>>> the fact to the appropriate authorities? If so, how long ago?
>>>>>
>>>>> If not, why not?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just wondering. Others reading here might be wondering too!
>>>>> Hey dip****....
>>>>> Read the writeups on how long the authorities and other
> organizations |>> have been working this.
>>>>> Many of us have been involved for years on this one. We don't do it
>>>> here, there are a number of private forums and networks devoted to |
>>> tracking this crap.
>>>>> Mr. Lipman and I do see each other in those (waves, Dave).
>>>>> You are just pissed off because none of them will let *you* in.
>>>>
>>> Dave waves back... ;-)
>>>
>>
>> Yup...
>>
>> If BoaTurd Doofis truly knew even 5% of the real crap that's going on on the net, he'd
>> dump his pooter, his cellphone, cancel all his credit cards, smash his TV, rip the
>> landline phone out, and go try to convince a monastery to take him in.
>>
>
>
> For sure !


It seems likely that the internet will remain in its Gold Rush phase for
some time yet. And in the crevices and corners of its slightly
thrown-together structures, darknets and other private online
environments will continue to flourish. They can be inspiring places to
spend time in, full of dissidents and eccentrics and the Internet's
original free-wheeling spirit. But a darknet is not always somewhere for
the squeamish.

On Freenet, there is a currently a "freesite" which makes allegations
against supposed paedophiles, complete with names, photographs,
extensive details of their lives online, and partial home addresses. In
much smaller type underneath runs the disclaimer: "The material
contained in this freesite is hearsay . . . It is not admissible in
court proceedings and would certainly not reach the burden of proof
requirement of a criminal trial." For the time being, when I'm wandering
around online, I may stick to Google.

*

A good article here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...ternet-freenet