On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:34:34 -0400, Warren Oates
<warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote:

>In article <ua65b7dvl71urnrd1mtv15r1ccjcvgasp5@4ax.com>,
> Lucky Stiff <luckystiff@hardon.com> wrote:
>
>> LOL! It seems to me that you dumbasses have this all wrong. Emmett
>> posted about this on his Facebook page so NO, Emmett has not posted
>> here using socks, so give it up *******s.
>
>No, look, you said you "spoke to Emmett via landline" and that intrigues
>me. I'm actually not one of your enemies, dood, but we both know that
>Emmett doesn't have a ****ing "landline" and anyway, who initiated the
>call? Did he call you to set the record straight? Or did you call him at
>Kari's or Josh's or on a payphone somewhere? It just sounds so much
>like Emmett's line of bull****.

Maybe you should change your attitude about Emmett and see who the
true bull****ters are.

I spoke to him via my landline to his blackberry this morning, right
after Albatross stated that Emmett got a warning from DCF. I am also
friends with on Facebook and Twitter and I know positively that he has
not posted here using socks. You guys have been trolled as seen by the
other "lucky stiff"
>
>C'mon, Emmett, Greg was fair about this. He said "don't post to AUK." He
>didn't say "don't post anywhere, not in the flonk or in your wrestling
>group or on Facebook," he just said "don't post to AUK" and you just
>couldn't ****ing resist.

I'm sorry but your accusations of me being Emmett are a little far
fetched considering that Greg stated here last night that he had heard
from Emmett and that Emmett wouldn't be posting until the 6th.
>
>On the other hand, maybe you're just real good at a too-good imitation.
>Maybe you're Greg.

And maybe you are Emmett??????????