On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:43:44 -0400, Lucky Stiff
<luckystiff@hardon.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:34:34 -0400, Warren Oates
><warren.oates@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <ua65b7dvl71urnrd1mtv15r1ccjcvgasp5@4ax.com>,
>> Lucky Stiff <luckystiff@hardon.com> wrote:
>>
>>> LOL! It seems to me that you dumbasses have this all wrong. Emmett
>>> posted about this on his Facebook page so NO, Emmett has not posted
>>> here using socks, so give it up *******s.
>>
>>No, look, you said you "spoke to Emmett via landline" and that intrigues
>>me. I'm actually not one of your enemies, dood, but we both know that
>>Emmett doesn't have a ****ing "landline" and anyway, who initiated the
>>call? Did he call you to set the record straight? Or did you call him at
>>Kari's or Josh's or on a payphone somewhere? It just sounds so much
>>like Emmett's line of bull****.
>
>Maybe you should change your attitude about Emmett and see who the
>true bull****ters are.
>
>I spoke to him via my landline to his blackberry this morning, right
>after Albatross stated that Emmett got a warning from DCF. I am also
>friends with on Facebook and Twitter and I know positively that he has
>not posted here using socks. You guys have been trolled as seen by the
>other "lucky stiff"
>>
>>C'mon, Emmett, Greg was fair about this. He said "don't post to AUK." He
>>didn't say "don't post anywhere, not in the flonk or in your wrestling
>>group or on Facebook," he just said "don't post to AUK" and you just
>>couldn't ****ing resist.
>
>I'm sorry but your accusations of me being Emmett are a little far
>fetched considering that Greg stated here last night that he had heard
>from Emmett and that Emmett wouldn't be posting until the 6th.
>>
>>On the other hand, maybe you're just real good at a too-good imitation.
>>Maybe you're Greg.
>
>And maybe you are Emmett??????????


Hi emutt.