Results 1 to 10 of 54

Thread: From this morning's email - is this itself a hoax?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: From this morning's email - is this itself a hoax?


    "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
    news:j8cv6c0nsq@news6.newsguy.com...
    > From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com>
    >
    >> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
    >> news:j8bktn02vn6@news4.newsguy.com...
    >>> From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    >>>> news:j8bgmq$ji5$3@dont-email.me...
    >>>>> Is this itself a hoax?
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> PLEASE CIRCULATE THIS NOTICE TO YOUR FRIENDS, FAMILY, CONTACTS!
    >>>>
    >>>> First clue, smells like a chain letter.
    >>>>
    >>>>> In the coming days, you should be aware.....
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Do not open any message with an attachment called: Invitation FACEBOOK,
    >>>>> regardless of who sent it. It is a virus that opens an OlympIc torch that
    >>>>> burns the whole hard disc C of your computer.
    >>>>
    >>>> Second clue, insupportable claims of damage.
    >>>>
    >>>>> This virus will be received from someone you had in your address book
    >>>>> That's why you should send this message to all your contacts. It is better
    >>>>> to receive this email 25 times to receive the virus and open it
    >>>>
    >>>> Third clue, chain letter assurances that it is better to clutter up
    >>>> mailboxes
    >>>> with FUD than to investigate for oneself.
    >>>>
    >>>>> If you receive a mail called: Invitation FACEBOOK, though sent by a
    >>>>> friend, do not open it and delete it immediately. It is the worst virus
    >>>>> announced by CNN. A new virus has been discovered recently that has been
    >>>>> classified by Microsoft as the most destructive virus ever.
    >>>>
    >>>> Fourth clue - appeal to CNN and MSFT as authoritative sources.
    >>>> this is practically a template example of a hoax e-mail.
    >>>>
    >>>>> It is a Trojan Horse that asks you to install an adobe flash plug-in. Once
    >>>>> you install it, it's all over.
    >>>>
    >>>> More FUD for good measure.
    >>>>
    >>>>> And there is no repair yet for this kind of virus.
    >>>>
    >>>> ...and a cherry on top.
    >>>>
    >>>>> This virus simply destroys the Zero Sector of the Hard Disc, where the
    >>>>> vital information of their function is saved.
    >>>>
    >>>> Another template example of hoax (sector zero bull****).
    >>>>
    >>>>> SNOPES SAYS THIS IS TRUE............
    >>>>> http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/youtube.asp
    >>>>
    >>>> The snopes article doesn't corroborate the above, and only references
    >>>> the old Koobface worm (which *is* real) - that is, real *old* as far as the
    >>>> malware world is concerned.
    >>>>
    >>>> BTW, Koobface is/was a *worm* but not a true worm.
    >>>
    >>> Additionally, Snopes is NOT an authoratative source on hoaxes. Hoax slayer
    >>> is.
    >>>
    >>> http://www.hoax-slayer.com/invitatio...rus-hoax.shtml

    >>
    >> Good point, good site.
    >>
    >>> { albeit, it is getting a bit too commercialized }

    >>
    >> :-(
    >>
    >> Just type a key phrase of the e-mail into a search engine and that URL is
    >> likely to be high on the list. Such a *service* should not be commercialized
    >> as it detracts from its usefulness IMO. Hopefully, they'll be able to
    >> continue
    >> to resist any temptation to self-promote.

    >
    > There used to be a non-commercialized, gov't. sponsored authoratative, site
    > called Hoax Bustsers on the DoE CIAC. But alas it is no more.
    >
    > Another site, that replaced the CIAC, is http://www.hoaxbusters.org/


    Very good!!

    Thanks.



  2. #2
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: From this morning's email - is this itself a hoax?

    FromTheRafters wrote:
    > "David H. Lipman"<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
    > news:j8cv6c0nsq@news6.newsguy.com...

    [....]

    no more.
    >>
    >> Another site, that replaced the CIAC, is http://www.hoaxbusters.org/

    >
    > Very good!!
    >
    > Thanks.


    Agreed! :-)

    That led me on to here! http://www.hoaxbusters.org/hoax4.html

    Does the final advice hold good for Usenet groups too?!!


  3. #3
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: From this morning's email - is this itself a hoax?

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    news:j8dpno$mq3$1@dont-email.me...
    > FromTheRafters wrote:
    >> "David H. Lipman"<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
    >> news:j8cv6c0nsq@news6.newsguy.com...

    > [....]
    >
    > no more.
    >>>
    >>> Another site, that replaced the CIAC, is http://www.hoaxbusters.org/

    >>
    >> Very good!!
    >>
    >> Thanks.

    >
    > Agreed! :-)
    >
    > That led me on to here! http://www.hoaxbusters.org/hoax4.html
    >
    > Does the final advice hold good for Usenet groups too?!!


    Sort of, but a lot has to do with the unsolicited nature of such links
    when foisted upon you in an e-mail.

    Otherwise, a link is a link is a link ...



  4. #4
    ~BD~ Guest

    Re: From this morning's email - is this itself a hoax?

    FromTheRafters wrote:
    > "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    > news:j8dpno$mq3$1@dont-email.me...
    >> FromTheRafters wrote:
    >>> "David H. Lipman"<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
    >>> news:j8cv6c0nsq@news6.newsguy.com...

    >> [....]
    >>
    >> no more.
    >>>>
    >>>> Another site, that replaced the CIAC, is http://www.hoaxbusters.org/
    >>>
    >>> Very good!!
    >>>
    >>> Thanks.

    >>
    >> Agreed! :-)
    >>
    >> That led me on to here! http://www.hoaxbusters.org/hoax4.html
    >>
    >> Does the final advice hold good for Usenet groups too?!!

    >
    > Sort of, but a lot has to do with the unsolicited nature of such links
    > when foisted upon you in an e-mail.
    >
    > Otherwise, a link is a link is a link ...
    >
    >


    *ALL* the links on Usenet are effectively unsolicited - but (and I'm
    guessing now!) I expect you clicked on the one I posted! :-)

  5. #5
    FromTheRafters Guest

    Re: From this morning's email - is this itself a hoax?

    "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    news:j8e9vb$ni0$2@dont-email.me...
    > FromTheRafters wrote:
    >> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
    >> news:j8dpno$mq3$1@dont-email.me...
    >>> FromTheRafters wrote:
    >>>> "David H. Lipman"<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
    >>>> news:j8cv6c0nsq@news6.newsguy.com...
    >>> [....]
    >>>
    >>> no more.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Another site, that replaced the CIAC, is http://www.hoaxbusters.org/
    >>>>
    >>>> Very good!!
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks.
    >>>
    >>> Agreed! :-)
    >>>
    >>> That led me on to here! http://www.hoaxbusters.org/hoax4.html
    >>>
    >>> Does the final advice hold good for Usenet groups too?!!

    >>
    >> Sort of, but a lot has to do with the unsolicited nature of such links
    >> when foisted upon you in an e-mail.
    >>
    >> Otherwise, a link is a link is a link ...
    >>
    >>

    >
    > *ALL* the links on Usenet are effectively unsolicited - but (and I'm guessing
    > now!) I expect you clicked on the one I posted! :-)


    Of course, I have nothing to fear from links. That one's content is
    hopelessly outdated; should be in a museum next to the Rosetta
    Stone.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •