From this morning's email - is this itself a hoax?

[~BD~]

David H. Lipman wrote:

> Additionally, Snopes is NOT an authoratative source on hoaxes. Hoax slayer is.
>
> http://www.hoax-slayer.com/invitatio...rus-hoax.shtml
>
> { albeit, it is getting a bit too commercialized }


Thank you, David.

I've passed that link on to my friend in Oz, together with all comments
made by FromTheRafters.

[FromTheRafters]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j8btr3$ass$3@dont-email.me...
> David H. Lipman wrote:
>
>> Additionally, Snopes is NOT an authoratative source on hoaxes. Hoax slayer
>> is.
>>
>> http://www.hoax-slayer.com/invitatio...rus-hoax.shtml
>>
>> { albeit, it is getting a bit too commercialized }
>
>
> Thank you, David.
>
> I've passed that link on to my friend in Oz, together with all comments made
> by FromTheRafters.

After reading that site, your friend should be able to recognize
any future hoaxes by the first hint. ;-)

[~BD~]

FromTheRafters wrote:
> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:j8btr3$ass$3@dont-email.me...
>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>
>>> Additionally, Snopes is NOT an authoratative source on hoaxes. Hoax slayer
>>> is.
>>>
>>> http://www.hoax-slayer.com/invitatio...rus-hoax.shtml
>>>
>>> { albeit, it is getting a bit too commercialized }
>>
>>
>> Thank you, David.
>>
>> I've passed that link on to my friend in Oz, together with all comments made
>> by FromTheRafters.
>
> After reading that site, your friend should be able to recognize
> any future hoaxes by the first hint. ;-)


Like me, he *used* to be quite bright! ;-)