From this morning's email - is this itself a hoax?

[Bullwinkle.]

When you are a wisp of a man that can not tear your
way out of a wet paper bag, all you have is nasty mouth.

That is why he made road side bombs, not man enough to go face to face.


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j8co76$efg$1@dont-email.me...
> ****vark scribed ..
>
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:29:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please pray for him.
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>>> He might then get better sooner rather than later.
>>
>> Better than what?
>
>
> You truly are the Devil's spawn.
>
> You deserve what is coming your way.

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:07:17 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> ****vark scribed ..
>
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:29:01 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Please pray for him.
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>>> He might then get better sooner rather than later.
>>
>> Better than what?
>
>
> You truly are the Devil's spawn.

LOL. You really are nuts, ****.

>
> You deserve what is coming your way.

Are you threatening me, ****?



--
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without
civilization in between. - Oscar Wilde

[FromTheRafters]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j8dpno$mq3$1@dont-email.me...
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> "David H. Lipman"<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
>> news:j8cv6c0nsq@news6.newsguy.com...
> [....]
>
> no more.
>>>
>>> Another site, that replaced the CIAC, is http://www.hoaxbusters.org/
>>
>> Very good!!
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Agreed! :-)
>
> That led me on to here! http://www.hoaxbusters.org/hoax4.html
>
> Does the final advice hold good for Usenet groups too?!!

Sort of, but a lot has to do with the unsolicited nature of such links
when foisted upon you in an e-mail.

Otherwise, a link is a link is a link ...

[~BD~]

FromTheRafters wrote:
> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:j8dpno$mq3$1@dont-email.me...
>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> "David H. Lipman"<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
>>> news:j8cv6c0nsq@news6.newsguy.com...
>> [....]
>>
>> no more.
>>>>
>>>> Another site, that replaced the CIAC, is http://www.hoaxbusters.org/
>>>
>>> Very good!!
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Agreed! :-)
>>
>> That led me on to here! http://www.hoaxbusters.org/hoax4.html
>>
>> Does the final advice hold good for Usenet groups too?!!
>
> Sort of, but a lot has to do with the unsolicited nature of such links
> when foisted upon you in an e-mail.
>
> Otherwise, a link is a link is a link ...
>
>

*ALL* the links on Usenet are effectively unsolicited - but (and I'm
guessing now!) I expect you clicked on the one I posted! :-)

[FromTheRafters]

"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j8e9vb$ni0$2@dont-email.me...
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:j8dpno$mq3$1@dont-email.me...
>>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> "David H. Lipman"<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
>>>> news:j8cv6c0nsq@news6.newsguy.com...
>>> [....]
>>>
>>> no more.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another site, that replaced the CIAC, is http://www.hoaxbusters.org/
>>>>
>>>> Very good!!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Agreed! :-)
>>>
>>> That led me on to here! http://www.hoaxbusters.org/hoax4.html
>>>
>>> Does the final advice hold good for Usenet groups too?!!
>>
>> Sort of, but a lot has to do with the unsolicited nature of such links
>> when foisted upon you in an e-mail.
>>
>> Otherwise, a link is a link is a link ...
>>
>>
>
> *ALL* the links on Usenet are effectively unsolicited - but (and I'm guessing
> now!) I expect you clicked on the one I posted! :-)

Of course, I have nothing to fear from links. That one's content is
hopelessly outdated; should be in a museum next to the Rosetta
Stone.

[Betty]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:43:11 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>
>> Buffalo wrote:
>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>>> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> He just doesn't realise just how foolish and stupid it makes him look
>>>>> to others.
>>>> Please take you OWN advice.
>>>>
>>>> You do not realize just how foolish and stupid you look to others.
>>>> Your continued foolish activity is the very reason you get that type
>>>> of proportional response.
>>> That is a fact. Buffalo
>> But I don't give a sh*t! :-)
>
> The 'i' key on your keyboard is ****ed, ****. It prints an asterisk.
>

Do euphemistic asterisks change the meaning of words? Are they cleaner
.... less offensive? Does it mean the asterisk user is not actually cursing?

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:41:17 -0500, Betty wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:43:11 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Buffalo wrote:
>>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>>>> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> He just doesn't realise just how foolish and stupid it makes him
>>>>>> look to others.
>>>>> Please take you OWN advice.
>>>>>
>>>>> You do not realize just how foolish and stupid you look to others.
>>>>> Your continued foolish activity is the very reason you get that type
>>>>> of proportional response.
>>>> That is a fact. Buffalo
>>> But I don't give a sh*t! :-)
>>
>> The 'i' key on your keyboard is ****ed, ****. It prints an asterisk.
>>
>>
> Do euphemistic asterisks change the meaning of words? Are they cleaner
> ... less offensive? Does it mean the asterisk user is not actually
> cursing?

In reply:

1. No, of course not.

2. No, of course not.

3. No, of course not.

Christian teaching states (and most of the dimwits who asteriskise words
profess at some time or another to be 'Christian') that even thinking of
committing the sin is sinful in and of itself.

This being the case, the sto0pid f*ckers might as well type the whole
f*cking word as they'll be going to hell with the rest of us, anyway.

FYI
HTH
HAND

:-)



--
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without
civilization in between. - Oscar Wilde

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:41:17 -0500, Betty wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:43:11 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Buffalo wrote:
>>>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>>>>> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He just doesn't realise just how foolish and stupid it makes him
>>>>>>> look to others.
>>>>>> Please take you OWN advice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You do not realize just how foolish and stupid you look to others.
>>>>>> Your continued foolish activity is the very reason you get that type
>>>>>> of proportional response.
>>>>> That is a fact. Buffalo
>>>> But I don't give a sh*t! :-)
>>>
>>> The 'i' key on your keyboard is ****ed, ****. It prints an asterisk.
>>>
>>>
>> Do euphemistic asterisks change the meaning of words? Are they cleaner
>> ... less offensive? Does it mean the asterisk user is not actually
>> cursing?
>
> In reply:
>
> 1. No, of course not.
>
> 2. No, of course not.
>
> 3. No, of course not.
>
> Christian teaching states (and most of the dimwits who asteriskise words
> profess at some time or another to be 'Christian') that even thinking of
> committing the sin is sinful in and of itself.
>
> This being the case, the sto0pid f*ckers might as well type the whole
> f*cking word as they'll be going to hell with the rest of us, anyway.
>
> FYI
> HTH
> HAND
>
> :-)

As I said elsewhere, you're the spawn of the Devil himself!

[~BD~]

Betty wrote:
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:43:11 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>
>>> Buffalo wrote:
>>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>>>> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> He just doesn't realise just how foolish and stupid it makes him look
>>>>>> to others.
>>>>> Please take you OWN advice.
>>>>>
>>>>> You do not realize just how foolish and stupid you look to others.
>>>>> Your continued foolish activity is the very reason you get that type
>>>>> of proportional response.
>>>> That is a fact. Buffalo
>>> But I don't give a sh*t! :-)
>>
>> The 'i' key on your keyboard is ****ed, ****. It prints an asterisk.
>>
>
> Do euphemistic asterisks change the meaning of words? Are they cleaner
> ... less offensive? Does it mean the asterisk user is not actually cursing?

No to all.

But I *do* find the use of foul language offensive, especially in the
written form and even *more* especially when it is the presence of ladies.

Aardvark shows disrespect to *all* users of the newsgroups in which he
posts by continuing to swear instead of discussing or debating matters
rationally. He's simply pig-ignorant. I must have been mad to offer him
the hand of friendship and meet him in real life on my narrowboat. He
didn't even buy *me* a beer!

Tell me, Betty - do the words surrounded by asterisks in *this* post
appear in BOLD print in your Thunderbird newsreader? I also note that
it's not the most current version. Version 7 is available here:-
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:35:26 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:41:17 -0500, Betty wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:43:11 +0100, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Buffalo wrote:
>>>>>> David H. Lipman wrote:
>>>>>>> From: "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He just doesn't realise just how foolish and stupid it makes him
>>>>>>>> look to others.
>>>>>>> Please take you OWN advice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You do not realize just how foolish and stupid you look to others.
>>>>>>> Your continued foolish activity is the very reason you get that
>>>>>>> type of proportional response.
>>>>>> That is a fact. Buffalo
>>>>> But I don't give a sh*t! :-)
>>>>
>>>> The 'i' key on your keyboard is ****ed, ****. It prints an asterisk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Do euphemistic asterisks change the meaning of words? Are they cleaner
>>> ... less offensive? Does it mean the asterisk user is not actually
>>> cursing?
>>
>> In reply:
>>
>> 1. No, of course not.
>>
>> 2. No, of course not.
>>
>> 3. No, of course not.
>>
>> Christian teaching states (and most of the dimwits who asteriskise
>> words profess at some time or another to be 'Christian') that even
>> thinking of committing the sin is sinful in and of itself.
>>
>> This being the case, the sto0pid f*ckers might as well type the whole
>> f*cking word as they'll be going to hell with the rest of us, anyway.
>>
>> FYI HTH HAND
>>
>> :-)
>
> As I said elsewhere, you're the spawn of the Devil himself!

And, as I wrote elsewhere, you're a ****ing hypocritical ****.

BTW, ****- unless Auld Nick changed himself into a dual personality with
names beginning with 'J' and 'D', you're totally wrong.

QUELLE SURPRISE!!!!!!!!!!11111!!!!!!1111!!!!!111!!!!!!!!! !!!!

--
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without
civilization in between. - Oscar Wilde