printf("goodbye, Dennis");

[Bear Bottoms]

Robert James <storagelocker232@jonesBIGASStruckrentalandstorage .com> wrote in
news:j916j6$6m3$1@dont-email.me:

> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:22:51 +0000; I imposed a declaration in opposition
> to Bear Bottoms's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION in support
> of the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. So noted by the
> Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary declaration,
> Xns9F933E394B22bearbottoms1gmaicom@130.225.254.104 :
>
>> If you want to know more, it's explained in this thread last year.
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...thread/thread/
>> c014953
>> b6881f654/63a0dba6a9e30e2c
>
> Nice long URL wrapping there, Billy.
>

You don't know how to cut and paste?

--
Bear
http://bearware.info

[Bear Bottoms]

Robert James <storagelocker232@jonesBIGASStruckrentalandstorage .com> wrote in
news:j8q545$q87$1@dont-email.me:

> On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:44:37 +0000; I imposed a declaration in opposition
> to MotoFox's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION in support of the
> CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. So noted by the Federal
> Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary declaration,
> j8q41s$lpf$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> And it came to pass that Robert James delivered the following message
>> unto the people, saying~
>>
>>> What type of ignorant, brain damaging chemicals have you be<FAILURE>
>>
>> If you'd been following the thread before blowing your top, I was
>> replying to ~BD~'s immature, vulgar reply. Look back in other threads
>> here and on 24s.helpdesk and you'll see me getting flamed the same way
>> ("f- you c-", or permutations thereof, seems to be the standard
>> knee-jerk comeback to almost anyone who dares write the inconvenient
>> truths about $teve.)
>
> You replied to BB after BB's reply to me; in which you seeming agreed
> with BB's position after his direct follow-up to my post. Again, never
> been on helpdesk... Yet if you meant to direct your comments to ~BD~ then
> you did it on the wrong post.

So you admit confirming not denying you ever said that?

--
Bear
http://bearware.info

[Bear Bottoms]

MotoFox <confucius-say@enlightenment!to!him!lead!it!for!bangpath!foll ow!man!
wise.UUCP> wrote in news:j91c78$fat$1@dont-email.me:

> And it came to pass that Bear Bottoms delivered the following message unto
> the people, saying~
>
>> So you admit confirming not denying you ever said that?
>
> He probably would, or not, but knowing RJ he'd probably ding you £500
> just for the privelege of knowing!

So he's a non-payer, is he? Has he burned a lot of people?

--
Bear
http://bearware.info

[The Daring Dufas]

On 11/4/2011 1:15 PM, Sycho wrote:
> This just in to the alt.2600 news room. On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:10:16
> +0000 (UTC) it was announced to all in a public briefing, Bear Bottoms
> <bearbottoms1@gmai.com> made the following declaration and shocked the
> world when the following was announced:
>
>> Robert James<storagelocker232@jonesBIGASStruckrentalandst orage.com> wrote in
>> news:j916j6$6m3$1@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:22:51 +0000; I imposed a declaration in opposition
>>> to Bear Bottoms's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION in support
>>> of the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. So noted by the
>>> Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary declaration,
>>> Xns9F933E394B22bearbottoms1gmaicom@130.225.254.104 :
>>>
>>>> If you want to know more, it's explained in this thread last year.
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...thread/thread/
>>>> c014953
>>>> b6881f654/63a0dba6a9e30e2c
>>>
>>> Nice long URL wrapping there, Billy.
>>>
>>
>> You don't know how to cut and paste?
>
> I ate the paste. It tasted like chicken.

I don't remember that from first grade. ^_^

TDD

[=?UTF-8?B?wqfDscO8aHfDtsKjZg==?=]

Robert James wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:22:01 +0000; I imposed a declaration in opposition
> to Robert James's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION in support
> of the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. So noted by the
> Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary declaration,
> j916vp$6m3$3@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:59:35 -0700; I imposed a declaration in
>> opposition to §nühw¤£f's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION in
>> support of the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. So
>> noted by the Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary
>> declaration, 201111041558.UTC.j91237$4lr$2@tioat.net:
>>
>>> LOL! yeah I knew GS paied their grunts like 9$ an hour but they charge
>>> them for travel expenses??? WTF?
>> Yep, in fact I once meant a GS fool, who had to rent and paint his
>> stupid VW buggies. The idiot was clueless and did not understand why a
>> SCSI hard drive did not have the right connections for an IDE only
>> motherboard. Best Buy to the rescue demanding the customer buy a whole
>> new computer cuz they no longer stocked IDE HD drives!
>
> I'm talking about SATA HDDs, I'm just so old...
> SATA not SCSI, just got out of bed...
>
Yeah, I was wonderin about that They must be "independent
contractors" or similar if they are responsible for the vehicles. Its
how these big cheapass companies get around paying benefits nowadays.

--
http://www.privacySOS.org | www.extinctioncrisis.org
www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

[=?windows-1252?Q?=A7=F1=FChw=F6=A3f?=]

MotoFox wrote:
> And it came to pass that The Daring Dufas delivered the following message
> unto the people, saying~
>
>> I don't remember that from first grade. ^_^
>
> Yeah, I always remember it tasting like plastic.
>
> But I was always more of a papier-mache guy myself. Once you've tasted
> papier-mache, you'll never want to go back to paste!
>
I chewed on the lead (painted) GIANT RED PENCILS...
with predictable and obvious results...

<eyes roll back in head>

--
http://www.privacySOS.org | www.extinctioncrisis.org
www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

[=?UTF-8?B?wqduw7xod8KkwqNm?=]

Robert James wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:56:54 -0600; I imposed a declaration in opposition
> to §ñühwö£f's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION in support of
> the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. So noted by the
> Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary declaration,
> j91n1h$qji$3@dont-email.me:
>
>> Robert James wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:22:01 +0000; I imposed a declaration in
>>> opposition to Robert James's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY
>>> INJUNCTION in support of the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY
>>> INJUNCTION. So noted by the Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding
>>> preliminary declaration, j916vp$6m3$3@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:59:35 -0700; I imposed a declaration in
>>>> opposition to §nühw¤£f's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
>>>> in support of the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION.
>>>> So noted by the Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary
>>>> declaration, 201111041558.UTC.j91237$4lr$2@tioat.net:
>>>>
>>>>> LOL! yeah I knew GS paied their grunts like 9$ an hour but they
>>>>> charge them for travel expenses??? WTF?
>>>> Yep, in fact I once meant a GS fool, who had to rent and paint his
>>>> stupid VW buggies. The idiot was clueless and did not understand why a
>>>> SCSI hard drive did not have the right connections for an IDE only
>>>> motherboard. Best Buy to the rescue demanding the customer buy a whole
>>>> new computer cuz they no longer stocked IDE HD drives!
>>> I'm talking about SATA HDDs, I'm just so old... SATA not SCSI, just
>>> got out of bed...
>>>
>> Yeah, I was wonderin about that They must be "independent
>> contractors" or similar if they are responsible for the vehicles. Its
>> how these big cheapass companies get around paying benefits nowadays.
>
> O'nooooooooo's I made a mistake on Usenet,
> SATA... SCSI, you see how I could have buggered that up!
> Someone give me some whiteout for the newsreader.
>
> Yes, a lot of corp-gov m'fers use the term "contractor" to not pay
> minimum wage, ignore health & safety, and screw over every labour (adds
> Canadian "u") law. Yet you have no options or rights when hired as an
> "independent contractor", your their *****; d00d!
>


--
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
www.friendsofanimals.org |www.snuhwolf.9f.com|
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

[=?UTF-8?B?wqfDscO8aHfDtsKjZg==?=]

Robert James wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:56:54 -0600; I imposed a declaration in opposition
> to §ñühwö£f's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION in support of
> the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. So noted by the
> Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary declaration,
> j91n1h$qji$3@dont-email.me:
>
>> Robert James wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:22:01 +0000; I imposed a declaration in
>>> opposition to Robert James's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY
>>> INJUNCTION in support of the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY
>>> INJUNCTION. So noted by the Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding
>>> preliminary declaration, j916vp$6m3$3@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:59:35 -0700; I imposed a declaration in
>>>> opposition to §nühw¤£f's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
>>>> in support of the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION.
>>>> So noted by the Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary
>>>> declaration, 201111041558.UTC.j91237$4lr$2@tioat.net:
>>>>
>>>>> LOL! yeah I knew GS paied their grunts like 9$ an hour but they
>>>>> charge them for travel expenses??? WTF?
>>>> Yep, in fact I once meant a GS fool, who had to rent and paint his
>>>> stupid VW buggies. The idiot was clueless and did not understand why a
>>>> SCSI hard drive did not have the right connections for an IDE only
>>>> motherboard. Best Buy to the rescue demanding the customer buy a whole
>>>> new computer cuz they no longer stocked IDE HD drives!
>>> I'm talking about SATA HDDs, I'm just so old... SATA not SCSI, just
>>> got out of bed...
>>>
>> Yeah, I was wonderin about that They must be "independent
>> contractors" or similar if they are responsible for the vehicles. Its
>> how these big cheapass companies get around paying benefits nowadays.
>
> O'nooooooooo's I made a mistake on Usenet,
> SATA... SCSI, you see how I could have buggered that up!
> Someone give me some whiteout for the newsreader.
>
Must be catching; I just touretticly hit POST for no reason.

OH LOOK! A BUTTON! I MUST CLICK!!!!!!1111111!!!!!!!
MMMMMMMMMMMMMM...BUTTONY!

> Yes, a lot of corp-gov m'fers use the term "contractor" to not pay
> minimum wage, ignore health & safety, and screw over every labour (adds
> Canadian "u") law. Yet you have no options or rights when hired as an
> "independent contractor", your their *****; d00d!
>
ANd this is why THE STREETS WILL RUN RED!!!!!!1111111111!!!!!!!!!!

WE AER TEH 99% TEHY R TEH 1%!!!!!!!!!!

No, seriously, they should be worried. History shows that two tiered
class structured societies are inherently unstable. Lords & Serfs wont
cut it in this day & age.

<nods>
--
http://www.privacySOS.org | www.extinctioncrisis.org
www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

[Bullwinkle.]

Since you live at home with mum and gramps
have a degree as an "artist" have no job and pay
no taxes, you view is not worth much.

why don't you get a job, hey join the Marines, pay taxes
and get some skin in the game?

You are nothing but a moocher.


"§ñühwö£f" <snuhwolf@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:j945un$d9o$1@dont-email.me...
WE AER TEH 99% TEHY R TEH 1%!!!!!!!!!!

[=?UTF-8?B?wqfDscO8aHfDtsKjZg==?=]

Robert James wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:08:43 -0700; I imposed a declaration in opposition
> to §nühw¤£f's motion to modify THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION in support of
> the CROSS MOTION TO VACATE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. So noted by the
> Federal Court of Usenet Justice proceeding preliminary declaration,
> 201111051607.UTC.j93n0t$rs9$2@tioat.net:
>
>
> Okay... like, what you know - whatever!
>
d00d...thats so random!

<http://www.randomwebsite.com/>

--
http://www.privacySOS.org | www.extinctioncrisis.org
www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\