Ping FTR: Mebromi BIOS Virus Out in the Wild

[Jenn]

On 10/23/2011 3:29 PM, Betty wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>> Betty wrote:
>>> ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Your explanation helped enormously!
>>>>
>>>> Thank you! :-)
>>>>
>>>> You must appreciate that conversations taking place in a test group
>>>> are totally insignificant. I was surprised that you joined in, Betty.
>>>> Maybe that's why the data wasn't firmly logged in my brain.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are most welcome, David!! Actually, I had great fun explaining the
>>> situation.
>>>
>>> I don't know why you would be surprised at my posts to that group, David
>>> ... since that is where the EXIF discussion was taking place, but your
>>> sarcasm is noted, David.
>>>
>>> I did take note, however, that the conversations in that group are not
>>> so insignificant that you fail to join in, David, as you did so with
>>> gusto in the one in question, David. [g]
>>>
>>> You take such great pleasure in taking pot shots at me, David ... and I
>>> want you to be happy, David. [g]
>>>
>>> I try to give you every opportunity to practice your favorite art with
>>> me, dearest, lovely lad David. [g]
>>>
>>> ------
>>> Arrogant-Cheeky-Git-Betty Boo
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Arrogant, Cheeky-Git, Betty Boo! :-)
>>
>> Your post, Betty, is off-topic - here on this group, Betty.
>>
>> Please continue on *my* group, scorched-earth, Betty.
>>
>> Thanks, Betty! :-)
>
> *You* asked the off-topic questions in *this* group. That was an
> invitation for the off-topic replies here. I assume that there is no
> privacy in an open forum. Possibly, there is spy-ware that indicates
> when I'm here ... lurking ... nefariously. Perhaps we could discuss that
> aspect and stay on-topic ... David. [g]
>
> I don't like "your" group, but I am seriously considering exposing the
> truth of what I said on my last visit. I have the evidence of the less
> than friendly introduction I received before I made an entrance there.

You mean this thread? http://************/2bfkxy

> And ... the snotty reception afterward when I showed up to clear my name
> of false accusations. It's always the same group of "wonderful, lovely"
> people who show their devotion to ... whatever.

You should probably get your accusations correct as to who said what.




--
Jenn
(posting from Thunderbird)

[Betty]

Jenn wrote:

> You should probably get your accusations correct as to who said what.

I don't believe I've made any accusations other than the correct one. It
*was you* who first mentioned my name. Are you going to deny it? It's
right there in black and white. That post of yours started the entire thing.

I don't intend to take any **** off of you, and I'm not going to fight
with you in this group.

If you are challenging me to come over to S-E to argue the point, I'll
be happy to show that I told the truth. Why don't you zap an email off
to your buddy Eagle so he can be there too and show his ass like he
usually does. I'm sure SN will thrilled to pipe up and butt in like she
did the first time around and call other people she doesn't know "liar".

Thanks again, BD ... "genuine" poster.

[Jenn]

On 10/23/2011 7:06 PM, Betty wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
>
>> You should probably get your accusations correct as to who said what.


> I don't believe I've made any accusations other than the correct one. It
> *was you* who first mentioned my name. Are you going to deny it? It's
> right there in black and white. That post of yours started the entire
> thing.


I *mentioned* your name.. so? I said nothing after that in that threat
about you.


> I don't intend to take any **** off of you, and I'm not going to fight
> with you in this group.
>
> If you are challenging me to come over to S-E to argue the point, I'll
> be happy to show that I told the truth.

You made it sound like I said something bad about you. Before you go
all postal that I said your name you might should have asked why I said
it, although you've already made up your mind.

> Why don't you zap an email off
> to your buddy Eagle so he can be there too and show his ass like he
> usually does. I'm sure SN will thrilled to pipe up and butt in like she
> did the first time around and call other people she doesn't know "liar".

If you have issues with what someone else said, don't take it out on me
just because I said your name.

> Thanks again, BD ... "genuine" poster.


--
Jenn
(posting from Thunderbird)

[Jenn]

On 10/23/2011 9:46 PM, Jenn wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 7:06 PM, Betty wrote:

> I *mentioned* your name.. so? I said nothing after that in that *threat *

>
typo ... *thread*

--
Jenn
(posting from Thunderbird)

[Betty]

I told you I am not going to fight with you here. That is exactly what I
meant.

Jenn wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 7:06 PM, Betty wrote:
>> Jenn wrote:
>>
>>> You should probably get your accusations correct as to who said what.
>
>
>> I don't believe I've made any accusations other than the correct one. It
>> *was you* who first mentioned my name. Are you going to deny it? It's
>> right there in black and white. That post of yours started the entire
>> thing.
>
>
> I *mentioned* your name.. so? I said nothing after that in that threat
> about you.

>> I don't intend to take any **** off of you, and I'm not going to fight
>> with you in this group.
>>
>> If you are challenging me to come over to S-E to argue the point, I'll
>> be happy to show that I told the truth.
>
> You made it sound like I said something bad about you. Before you go
> all postal that I said your name you might should have asked why I said
> it, although you've already made up your mind.

>> Why don't you zap an email off
>> to your buddy Eagle so he can be there too and show his ass like he
>> usually does. I'm sure SN will thrilled to pipe up and butt in like she
>> did the first time around and call other people she doesn't know "liar".
>
> If you have issues with what someone else said, don't take it out on me
> just because I said your name.
>
>> Thanks again, BD ... "genuine" poster.
>
>

[Jenn]

On 10/23/2011 10:02 PM, Betty wrote:


> Jenn wrote:
>> On 10/23/2011 7:06 PM, Betty wrote:
>>> Jenn wrote:
>>>
>>>> You should probably get your accusations correct as to who said what.
>>
>>
>>> I don't believe I've made any accusations other than the correct one. It
>>> *was you* who first mentioned my name. Are you going to deny it? It's
>>> right there in black and white. That post of yours started the entire
>>> thing.
>>
>>
>> I *mentioned* your name.. so? I said nothing after that in that threat
>> about you.
>
>>> I don't intend to take any **** off of you, and I'm not going to fight
>>> with you in this group.
>>>
>>> If you are challenging me to come over to S-E to argue the point, I'll
>>> be happy to show that I told the truth.
>>
>> You made it sound like I said something bad about you. Before you go
>> all postal that I said your name you might should have asked why I
>> said it, although you've already made up your mind.
>
>>> Why don't you zap an email off
>>> to your buddy Eagle so he can be there too and show his ass like he
>>> usually does. I'm sure SN will thrilled to pipe up and butt in like she
>>> did the first time around and call other people she doesn't know "liar".


>> If you have issues with what someone else said, don't take it out on
>> me just because I said your name.


>>> Thanks again, BD ... "genuine" poster.


> I told you I am not going to fight with you here. That is exactly what I
> meant.

I don't want to fight with you to begin with. I want to get things
straight.

You're mad at me for saying your name in a post? I wasn't even part of
the discussion that went on.


--
Jenn
(posting from Thunderbird)

[Peter Foldes]

"Jenn" <dont@send.me.email> wrote in message news:j82lcj$ifp$1@dont-email.me...
> On 10/23/2011 10:02 PM, Betty wrote:

> You're mad at me for saying your name in a post? I wasn't even part of
> the discussion that went on.


WF Jenn. Give it a rest already. You were wrong and just swallow it. Move on

JS

[~BD~]

Jenn wrote:

> You mean this thread? http://************/2bfkxy


I don't recall ever reading those posts before.

I wonder if there's anything else of importance I've missed.

[~BD~]

Betty wrote:

> Thanks again, BD ... "genuine" poster.


@Betty,

I enjoyed a two hour Skype video call with Jenn yesterday; it's quite
amazing what one finds to chat about!

Both of us were really pleased when you brought fresh views and ideas to
Scorched-Earth and simply cannot understand why you seem to be upset. If
you don't spell it out, there is no way that Jenn or I can understand.
Neither of us wants to fight with you.

How about starting over with a clean sheet?

D.

[Jenn]

~BD~ wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
>
>> You mean this thread? http://************/2bfkxy
>
>
> I don't recall ever reading those posts before.
>
> I wonder if there's anything else of importance I've missed.

.... beats me .. that was March 2010 ... almost 1½ years ago...

--
Jenn