~BD~ wrote:
[....]
> I'll see if I can find anything regarding TechAngel on WayBack Machine.
> It was a great place to play that I found on the Annexcafe User2User web
> site when I first went there some five years ago.
No success as yet, but she did exist!
http://www.google.co.uk/search?clien...OcSW8QOFqvj3Bg
~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:j70sbn$p8t$1@dont-email.me:
>> Do you have a link with Malware on that site or not?
>>
>
> As I've told you already - no.
At this point, anything else is libel..
> Yep, just my hinky feeling - but I *know* that PA Bear has lied. <shrug>
And slander...
> Some folk here have the technical ability to test my theory. One day,
> maybe someone will. I'd love nothing more than to be proved wrong,
> believe me.
You've no proof whatsoever to support any of the claims you've made. You're
done.
--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.
Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:j70sbn$p8t$1@dont-email.me:
>
>>> Do you have a link with Malware on that site or not?
>>>
>>
>> As I've told you already - no.
>
> At this point, anything else is libel..
>
>> Yep, just my hinky feeling - but I *know* that PA Bear has lied.<shrug>
>
> And slander...
*He has lied*.
>> Some folk here have the technical ability to test my theory. One day,
>> maybe someone will. I'd love nothing more than to be proved wrong,
>> believe me.
>
> You've no proof whatsoever to support any of the claims you've made. You're
> done.
That's why *you* are here, Dustin.
You *could* help put this to bed.
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:06:27 +0000, Dustin wrote:
> ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:j70sbn$p8t$1@dont-email.me:
>
>>> Do you have a link with Malware on that site or not?
>>>
>>
>> As I've told you already - no.
>
> At this point, anything else is libel..
>
>> Yep, just my hinky feeling - but I *know* that PA Bear has lied. <shrug>
>
> And slander...
>
>> Some folk here have the technical ability to test my theory. One day,
>> maybe someone will. I'd love nothing more than to be proved wrong,
>> believe me.
>
> You've no proof whatsoever to support any of the claims you've made. You're
> done.
IAWTP.
--
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without
civilization in between. - Oscar Wilde
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j70sbn$p8t$1@dont-email.me...
[...]
> Some folk here have the technical ability to test my theory. One day, maybe
> someone will. I'd love nothing more than to be proved wrong, believe me.
It does kinda-sorta relate to spyware and privacy, so I will say this.
You are correct, someone without knowledge of what they are
doing *will* find a way to ****-up their computer. They may very
well not ever notice that it is ****ed-up.
It just a fact of cyber-life and you should get over it.
There is a recent spate of trojans being offered up as an admin
toolkit of some sort on some tech 'forums'. Those that *aren't* so
clueless have issued warnings to readers and further posts blocked
if possible. This is how it works in open 'forums', as for those not so
open I guess you just have to decide for *yourself* who to trust and
stop trying to decide for *others*.
IMO much of the stuff of your posts will likely drive the clueless away
from the help that they really need, rather than help them as seems to
be your intent.
I trust many of those that you distrust, and no amount of hinky sauce
slathered on will mask that flavor. I am completely unfamiliar with the
'forums' that you mention, and intend to stay that way.
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:44:28 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote:
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:j70sbn$p8t$1@dont-email.me...
>
> [...]
>
>> Some folk here have the technical ability to test my theory. One day,
>> maybe someone will. I'd love nothing more than to be proved wrong,
>> believe me.
>
> It does kinda-sorta relate to spyware and privacy, so I will say this.
>
> You are correct, someone without knowledge of what they are doing *will*
> find a way to ****-up their computer. They may very well not ever notice
> that it is ****ed-up.
>
> It just a fact of cyber-life and you should get over it.
>
> There is a recent spate of trojans being offered up as an admin toolkit
> of some sort on some tech 'forums'. Those that *aren't* so clueless have
> issued warnings to readers and further posts blocked if possible. This
> is how it works in open 'forums', as for those not so open I guess you
> just have to decide for *yourself* who to trust and stop trying to
> decide for *others*.
>
> IMO much of the stuff of your posts will likely drive the clueless away
> from the help that they really need, rather than help them as seems to
> be your intent.
>
> I trust many of those that you distrust, and no amount of hinky sauce
> slathered on will mask that flavor. I am completely unfamiliar with the
> 'forums' that you mention, and intend to stay that way.
IAWTP.
Wholeheartedly. Especially the bit about driving away the klo0less.
--
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without
civilization in between. - Oscar Wilde
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:47:58 -0500, Gramsterdam wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>
>>Some folk here have the technical ability to test my theory. One day,
>>maybe someone will. I'd love nothing more than to be proved wrong,
>>believe me.
>
> So what do you propose to do in order test your theory? Am I supposed
> to logon as a dimwit with a question and see if they push malware
> scripts on me?
You're not actually toying with the idea of pandering to BD's paranoia
are you, mate?
--
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without
civilization in between. - Oscar Wilde
Gramsterdam wrote:
> ~BD~ wrote:
>
>>
>> Some folk here have the technical ability to test my theory. One day,
>> maybe someone will. I'd love nothing more than to be proved wrong,
>> believe me.
>
> So what do you propose to do in order test your theory? Am I supposed
> to logon as a dimwit with a question and see if they push malware
> scripts on me?
>
*YES*! :-)
FromTheRafters wrote:
> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:j70sbn$p8t$1@dont-email.me...
>
> [...]
>
>> Some folk here have the technical ability to test my theory. One day, maybe
>> someone will. I'd love nothing more than to be proved wrong, believe me.
>
> It does kinda-sorta relate to spyware and privacy, so I will say this.
>
> You are correct, someone without knowledge of what they are
> doing *will* find a way to ****-up their computer. They may very
> well not ever notice that it is ****ed-up.
>
> It just a fact of cyber-life and you should get over it.
>
> There is a recent spate of trojans being offered up as an admin
> toolkit of some sort on some tech 'forums'. Those that *aren't* so
> clueless have issued warnings to readers and further posts blocked
> if possible. This is how it works in open 'forums', as for those not so
> open I guess you just have to decide for *yourself* who to trust and
> stop trying to decide for *others*.
>
> IMO much of the stuff of your posts will likely drive the clueless away
> from the help that they really need, rather than help them as seems to
> be your intent.
>
> I trust many of those that you distrust, and no amount of hinky sauce
> slathered on will mask that flavor. I am completely unfamiliar with the
> 'forums' that you mention, and intend to stay that way.
>
>
YMMV! :-)
"FromTheRafters" <erratic.howard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:j71v9v$uj5$1@dont-email.me...
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:j70sbn$p8t$1@dont-email.me...
>
> [...]
>
>> Some folk here have the technical ability to test my theory. One day,
>> maybe someone will. I'd love nothing more than to be proved wrong,
>> believe me.
>
> It does kinda-sorta relate to spyware and privacy, so I will say this.
>
> You are correct, someone without knowledge of what they are
> doing *will* find a way to ****-up their computer. They may very
> well not ever notice that it is ****ed-up.
>
> It just a fact of cyber-life and you should get over it.
>
> There is a recent spate of trojans being offered up as an admin
> toolkit of some sort on some tech 'forums'. Those that *aren't* so
> clueless have issued warnings to readers and further posts blocked
> if possible. This is how it works in open 'forums', as for those not so
> open I guess you just have to decide for *yourself* who to trust and
> stop trying to decide for *others*.
>
> IMO much of the stuff of your posts will likely drive the clueless away
> from the help that they really need, rather than help them as seems to
> be your intent.
>
> I trust many of those that you distrust, and no amount of hinky sauce
> slathered on will mask that flavor. I am completely unfamiliar with the
> 'forums' that you mention, and intend to stay that way.
Totally agree. Truth is, no one can make anyone else take the time to know
even the basics of operating a computer. It's not anyone's issue but the
person using the computer.
>
>
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote