"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:j6khe8$g4d$5@dont-email.me...
> Peter Foldes wrote:
>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:j6k5dh$2jc$1@dont-email.me...
>>
>>> Hahaha! You are getting old, FTR! ;-)
>>>
>>> Things change, that's for sure!
>>
>>
>>
>> There is one thing that never changes. Stagnant and always the same. Let
>> us see how smart you are BD. Tell me what that is
>
> God's love for us.
Actually No. The answer is you
JS
Peter Foldes wrote:
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:j6khe8$g4d$5@dont-email.me...
>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>> news:j6k5dh$2jc$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>> Hahaha! You are getting old, FTR! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Things change, that's for sure!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There is one thing that never changes. Stagnant and always the same. Let
>>> us see how smart you are BD. Tell me what that is
>>
>> God's love for us.
>
>
> Actually No. The answer is you
So - you wish to apologise? Have me forgive you and move on?
Jenn wrote:
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:j6jfm5$cbc$1@dont-email.me...
>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>> ~BD~<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>>> news:j6h3cj$m4d$2@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>>>> FromTheRafters<erratic@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
>>>>>> news:j65csr$e9e$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>>>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> That's not a cookie issue. It's an OLD vulnerability I think?
>>>>>>>>>>> in the css. Any website can ask your browser for a dump of
>>>>>>>>>>> it's entire history.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It *is* the cookies. CSS is benign text that controls the
>>>>>>>>>> display of the page you are viewing. It can't do anything at
>>>>>>>>>> all to track you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, Dustin may be using an older no longer used abbreviation
>>>>>>>>> for Cross Site Scripting (CSS) which now means Cascading Style
>>>>>>>>> Sheets.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cross Site Scripting is XSS now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Okay. CSS has been Cascading Style Sheets since .. somewhere
>>>>>>>> into the last millennium<g>.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even though there is no confusion over CSRF/XSRF like there was
>>>>>>> over CSS/XSS, XSRF is often used anyway apparently in keeping
>>>>>>> with XSS and XMAS.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My bad my bad.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, Dustin! :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> for?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Accepting that you were wrong on this occasion.
>>
>> He wasn't. He was using the older terminology correctly. Like "SysOp"
>> and "coder" he was using terminology that he knows, in the correct
>> way, while others were misunderstanding him due to newer terminology
>> usurping the older.
>>
>> Cross-Site Scripting was being discussed around 1990 or so, and the
>> CSS-1 specification (Cascading Style Sheets) was being drafted around
>> 1997 and was almost fully implemented in browsers by the time Windows
>> 2000 came out. CSS came to mean Cascading Style Sheets by website
>> "coders" and "SysOps" everywhere. The security folks have now adopted
>> XSS as the new terminology.
>> BTW, that *was* the last millennium.
>
> It's nice that you have come around to my way of thinking. :-) {{you have
> been assimilated}}
>
I never said anything to the contrary. You just didn't comprehend what I
was saying (as usual).
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:30:01 -0400, Peter Foldes wrote:
> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
> news:j6khe8$g4d$5@dont-email.me...
>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>> "~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>> news:j6k5dh$2jc$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>> Hahaha! You are getting old, FTR! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Things change, that's for sure!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There is one thing that never changes. Stagnant and always the same.
>>> Let us see how smart you are BD. Tell me what that is
>>
>> God's love for us.
>
>
> Actually No. The answer is you
>
>
LOL.
--
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without
civilization in between. - Oscar Wilde
Aardvark wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:30:01 -0400, Peter Foldes wrote:
>
>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:j6khe8$g4d$5@dont-email.me...
>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:j6k5dh$2jc$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>>> Hahaha! You are getting old, FTR! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Things change, that's for sure!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is one thing that never changes. Stagnant and always the same.
>>>> Let us see how smart you are BD. Tell me what that is
>>>
>>> God's love for us.
>>
>>
>> Actually No. The answer is you
>>
>>
>
> LOL.
*****WIT*!
On 10/6/2011 12:56 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> Jenn wrote:
>>>> Accepting that you were wrong on this occasion.
>>>
>>> He wasn't. He was using the older terminology correctly. Like "SysOp"
>>> and "coder" he was using terminology that he knows, in the correct
>>> way, while others were misunderstanding him due to newer terminology
>>> usurping the older.
>>>
>>> Cross-Site Scripting was being discussed around 1990 or so, and the
>>> CSS-1 specification (Cascading Style Sheets) was being drafted around
>>> 1997 and was almost fully implemented in browsers by the time Windows
>>> 2000 came out. CSS came to mean Cascading Style Sheets by website
>>> "coders" and "SysOps" everywhere. The security folks have now adopted
>>> XSS as the new terminology.
>>> BTW, that *was* the last millennium.
>> It's nice that you have come around to my way of thinking. :-) {{you have
>> been assimilated}}
> I never said anything to the contrary. You just didn't comprehend what I
> was saying (as usual).
.... funny how I *comprehended* what you said in your previous post just
fine. Dustin was using old terminology... I was using newer
terminology... I'd disagree on the *usurping the older* part. That's
just the way language goes. It changes over time.
--
Jenn
(posting from Thunderbird)
On Oct 7, 6:48*am, Jenn <me@fakee..mail.com> wrote:
> ... funny how I *comprehended* what you said in your previous post just
> fine. *Dustin was using old terminology... I was using newer
> terminology... *I'd disagree on the *usurping the older* part. *That's
> just the way language goes. *It changes over time.
>
> --
You post like a troll.
Takes one to know one.
****head.
RL
So you and jenn are a trolling pair?
"RayLopez99" <raylopez88@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fddf9100-01a9-44b1-998b-c53b5f27d0c9@i33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 7, 6:48 am, Jenn <me@fakee..mail.com> wrote:
> ... funny how I *comprehended* what you said in your previous post just
> fine. Dustin was using old terminology... I was using newer
> terminology... I'd disagree on the *usurping the older* part. That's
> just the way language goes. It changes over time.
>
> --
You post like a troll.
Takes one to know one.
****head.
RL
Be careful he may put on a vest and come visit you.
However I believe he lacks the balls.
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j6l2o8$cse$2@dont-email.me...
Aardvark wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:30:01 -0400, Peter Foldes wrote:
>
>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>> news:j6khe8$g4d$5@dont-email.me...
>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>> "~BD~"<~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:j6k5dh$2jc$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>>>> Hahaha! You are getting old, FTR! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Things change, that's for sure!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is one thing that never changes. Stagnant and always the same.
>>>> Let us see how smart you are BD. Tell me what that is
>>>
>>> God's love for us.
>>
>>
>> Actually No. The answer is you
>>
>>
>
> LOL.
*****WIT*!
"RayLopez99" <raylopez88@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fddf9100-01a9-44b1-998b-c53b5f27d0c9@i33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 7, 6:48 am, Jenn <me@fakee..mail.com> wrote:
> ... funny how I *comprehended* what you said in your previous post just
> fine. Dustin was using old terminology... I was using newer
> terminology... I'd disagree on the *usurping the older* part. That's
> just the way language goes. It changes over time.
>
> --
You post like a troll.
Takes one to know one.
****head.
RL
***
Have you two met before, or are you just a good judge of character?
***
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote