Re: Raid/Dustin Cook: "I am possibly going to just flat out ****ing kill you."

[Dustin]

Gramsterdam <sealteam6@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in
news:gvgl67pu3qviqjbank14fdukhol4it94d1@Osama-is-dead.net:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>Why are you doing this?
>>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
>
> Experiment.
>
>>Is it a free for all to post base64 now? I can follow up, thousands
>>of torrents, not a problem.
>
> Go ahead, I might grab some.
>
>>I'm not going to provide you the link, I found it. you find it.
>>I would do it for an associate, but I consider you slightly above
>>pondscum, so... obviously, I won't do anything intentionally to help
>>you out.
>
> That's nice.
>
>>You asked if I'd share the lojack information I've compiled and
>>that's why I said I'd provide it to the closed techies site. You
>>wrongly assumed I was associating with blackhats and nicely got your
>>ass handed to you for it, by two different people.
>
> Ass handed to me? Hardly. They said you would report it to the
> "ethical hackers". Frankly, I think you're full of **** about what
> knowledge you claim to have garnered.

I'm glad you took the time to x-post this. I worked with David on the
research team at malwarebytes, he has my permission to discuss my
knowledge level as displayed there.

Get ready for another schooling, non coder. [g]

>>Quick to come to a biased decision about me, and quick to insult.
>
> Not quick, if you'll look back we have communicated years ago.

And were we so "friendly" then? I don't really remember disliking
another techie as much. So much so, that I don't even consider you near
my level. In fact, the more you tell me about yourself, the less
impressive you are to me, purely from technical skill.

I didn't lie to you about my knowledge or affiliations. X-posting isn't
going to have the effect you wanted, but it will have the effect I want
to see. [g]


> I read what they said, it's nothing like you are trying to make it
> out to be; an 'ASS-SPANK'.

They both corrected you. What else could it be? Btw, as I told you,
everyone in antimalware/antivirus who's professional and has the skills
required has access. [g]

> I think David Lipman and FTR will back *that* up. X-posted for Mr.
> Lipman.

As I said, I thank you for xposting this. You aren't going to like the
results I'm thinking, but I probably will enjoy it.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[G. Morgan]

Dustin wrote:

>> I think David Lipman and FTR will back *that* up. X-posted for Mr.
>> Lipman.
>
>As I said, I thank you for xposting this.

YW

>You aren't going to like the
>results I'm thinking, but I probably will enjoy it.

We will see.

For fun, let's ask each of them and everyone else who they would rather
meet and have a nice lunch with?

Myself, who has never threatened anyone with the now infamous ".45"; or
you, a known sociopath who is hell bent on exposing RL information as a
sole means of retaliation (and some written death/assault threats
sprinkled in) against your detractors?

I'd be more interested in the latter, who's up for lunch?

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:f1il67502r9ai39f5kdg4ttd1sofdu7qnc@Osama-is-dead.net:

> We will see.
>
> For fun, let's ask each of them and everyone else who they would rather
> meet and have a nice lunch with?

No. We're asking about technical skills, not people skills. Morgan. Let's
remain on point. You questioned my technical abilities, not my
interpersonal skills. No changing the rules now. [g]

Unless, you want to admit you are.. shall we say, woefully inferior to
myself on these machines? No? Well, lets wait for them to reply then.



--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[G. Morgan]

Dustin wrote:

>G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
>news:f1il67502r9ai39f5kdg4ttd1sofdu7qnc@Osama-is-dead.net:
>
>> We will see.
>>
>> For fun, let's ask each of them and everyone else who they would rather
>> meet and have a nice lunch with?
>
>No. We're asking about technical skills, not people skills. Morgan.

Actually, we are verifying their intention, to 'spank' or 'not to
spank'.

Both are just opinions/guesses of what you would do.

I don't think you posses any information that is not already out there
regarding LoJack.


> Let's
>remain on point. You questioned my technical abilities, not my
>interpersonal skills. No changing the rules now. [g]

I trust David L. or FTR to verify your claim, send them what you have.
Until then its all just your word {which is not good enough for me}.

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:tvkl67pfjo2ksru3887htge3pmuqs520u8@Osama-is-dead.net:

> I don't think you posses any information that is not already out
> there regarding LoJack.

Sure, I do. I possess the information to detect it AND disable it. I
acquired this on my own, I didn't need to use google. You OTH.. LOL,
well, obviously you don't possess much/any information on lojack.

> I trust David L. or FTR to verify your claim, send them what you
> have. Until then its all just your word {which is not good enough
> for me}.

David already knows what I have; He's a professional researcher, I
share with him. [g]. In fact, I correspond with David frequently over
IM. I'm so glad you've invited David to verify my claims. He's known me
for a long time Morgan. Ever since my Raid/slam days in fact.

FTR has known me for about the same amount of time, I do not correspond
with him aside from here. He isn't a researcher and so, what I share
with him is somewhat limited. However, I suspect he's still going to
back me on the technical knowledge.

When they verify I am who I said I was, Know what I've stated
previously, what do I get from you in return for having to prove
myself? A simple apology for being an asshat, or something more?

See, Morgan.. I think it's only right I get something in return when
you fail to tarnish my technical knowledge. So, what should it be?

You finally having to admit I'm the real deal isn't going to be enough.

--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[Anonymous Remailer (austria)]

In article <f1il67502r9ai39f5kdg4ttd1sofdu7qnc@Osama-is-dead.net>
G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote:
>
> Dustin wrote:
>
> >> I think David Lipman and FTR will back *that* up. X-posted for Mr.
> >> Lipman.
> >
> >As I said, I thank you for xposting this.
>
> YW
>
> >You aren't going to like the
> >results I'm thinking, but I probably will enjoy it.
>
> We will see.
>
> For fun, let's ask each of them and everyone else who they would rather
> meet and have a nice lunch with?
>
> Myself, who has never threatened anyone with the now infamous ".45"; or
> you, a known sociopath who is hell bent on exposing RL information as a
> sole means of retaliation (and some written death/assault threats
> sprinkled in) against your detractors?
>
> I'd be more interested in the latter, who's up for lunch?

Oh, my Gawd! You're standing up to him bare-assed naked - without even
a remailer between you. Gawd! You're my idol, GM. You must need a
wheelbarrow to carry around gonads that size.

:O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O)

You picking up the tab for lunch?

[G. Morgan]

Dustin wrote:

>See, Morgan.. I think it's only right I get something in return when
>you fail to tarnish my technical knowledge. So, what should it be?

I think its only fair to challenge it as you have tried with me in the
past to tarnish my knowledge. I'm aware of your relationship to David,
but I trust him to be completely impartial.

[G. Morgan]

Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:

>Oh, my Gawd! You're standing up to him bare-assed naked - without even
>a remailer between you. Gawd! You're my idol, GM. You must need a
>wheelbarrow to carry around gonads that size.

Heh, yeah right. <g>

>:O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O)
>
>You picking up the tab for lunch?

Sure, why not.

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news2ol675hmed9ei8g1bv16uaf80uc564ble@Osama-is-dead.net:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>See, Morgan.. I think it's only right I get something in return when
>>you fail to tarnish my technical knowledge. So, what should it be?
>
> I think its only fair to challenge it as you have tried with me in
the
> past to tarnish my knowledge. I'm aware of your relationship to
David,
> but I trust him to be completely impartial.

He is impartial, he won't lie to cover for me. By the same token, he'll
be heart breakingly honest with you. You are inferior to me on
technical skills alone. It's the brutal honest truth. You should have
picked people who don't actually know me, you might have been able to
pull a fast one.

David is a very poor choice, he's impartial, won't lie, and does know
me on a professional level. you're ****ed bro.

I didn't try to tarnish your knowledge, I'm aware of the abilities you
have, and especially aware of the ones you don't. You aren't going to
be able to compare with me. I have the hardware knowledge you have, and
the software knowledge, then I have really low level hardware and
software knowledge that you don't have. You see where this is going to
go, right? David knows of my skillset, he's seen it in action from both
sides of the fence.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[G. Morgan]

Dustin wrote:

> he's impartial, won't lie, and does know
>me on a professional level. you're ****ed bro.

That is why he was selected, that, and you dragged him into this.

>David is a very poor choice,

That makes him the perfect choice.