Re: Raid/Dustin Cook: "I am possibly going to just flat out ****ing kill you."

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:k4pl67ttovkson0t12a61ej28pjdumh6h4@Osama-is-dead.net:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>> he's impartial, won't lie, and does know
>>me on a professional level. you're ****ed bro.
>
> That is why he was selected, that, and you dragged him into this.

Well, in fairness; You selected him.

> That makes him the perfect choice.

Hehehe.. Okay then. We'll wait for his response if he chooses to provide
one.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[~BD~]

G. Morgan wrote:
> Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
>
>> Oh, my Gawd! You're standing up to him bare-assed naked - without even
>> a remailer between you. Gawd! You're my idol, GM. You must need a
>> wheelbarrow to carry around gonads that size.
>
> Heh, yeah right.<g>
>
>> :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O)
>>
>> You picking up the tab for lunch?
>
> Sure, why not.
>

A business expense?!!! ;-)

Did you ever read this post, Graham?

*

In this post <u4zdkZS0HHA.5160@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi...P05.phx.gbl%3E

You, David H Lipman, said ......

"I tell you why you should "trust" Peter.

Because Peter Foldes *IS* trustworthy and I back what he has written in
this thread."

**

As many others can attest, *Peter Foldes* (whomever that may be) is a
compulsive liar and a fraud and *cannot* be trusted.

That puts whatever *you* may say in doubt, David H Lipman.

I hope you realise that.

--
Dave - The truth *will* out!

[G. Morgan]

~BD~ wrote:

>G. Morgan wrote:
>> Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, my Gawd! You're standing up to him bare-assed naked - without even
>>> a remailer between you. Gawd! You're my idol, GM. You must need a
>>> wheelbarrow to carry around gonads that size.
>>
>> Heh, yeah right.<g>
>>
>>> :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O) :O)
>>>
>>> You picking up the tab for lunch?
>>
>> Sure, why not.
>>
>
>A business expense?!!! ;-)
>
>Did you ever read this post, Graham?
>
>*
>
>In this post <u4zdkZS0HHA.5160@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>
>
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi...P05.phx.gbl%3E
>
>You, David H Lipman, said ......
>
>"I tell you why you should "trust" Peter.
>
>Because Peter Foldes *IS* trustworthy and I back what he has written in
>this thread."
>
>**
>
>As many others can attest, *Peter Foldes* (whomever that may be) is a
>compulsive liar and a fraud and *cannot* be trusted.
>
>That puts whatever *you* may say in doubt, David H Lipman.
>
>I hope you realise that.

Mr. Lipman won't lie to me. We have bantered off and on for years.

[G. Morgan]

G. Morgan wrote:

>>I hope you realise that.
>
>Mr. Lipman won't lie to me. We have bantered off and on for years.


The only thing at issue for Mr. Lipman and FTR is if their intent was to
"hand my ass to me".

[~BD~]

G. Morgan wrote:
> G. Morgan wrote:
>
>>> I hope you realise that.
>>
>> Mr. Lipman won't lie to me. We have bantered off and on for years.
>
>
> The only thing at issue for Mr. Lipman and FTR is if their intent was to
> "hand my ass to me".
>

OK!

Btw, are you going to respond to my emails?

You didn't respond in the test.here group - but why should you?!!

[Bullwinkle.]

Oh dear davey, lost another stooge?


"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:j4f2qg$3vl$4@dont-email.me...

You didn't respond in the test.here group - but why should you?!!

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:23:21 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>> I think David Lipman and FTR will back *that* up. X-posted for Mr.
>>> Lipman.
>>
>>As I said, I thank you for xposting this.
>
> YW
>
>>You aren't going to like the results I'm thinking, but I probably will
>>enjoy it.
>
> We will see.
>
> For fun, let's ask each of them and everyone else who they would rather
> meet and have a nice lunch with?
>
> Myself, who has never threatened anyone with the now infamous ".45"; or
> you, a known sociopath who is hell bent on exposing RL information as a
> sole means of retaliation (and some written death/assault threats
> sprinkled in) against your detractors?
>
> I'd be more interested in the latter, who's up for lunch?

I'd have lunch with both of you. Just for the opportunity to bang yer
****ing heads together.



--
"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask
why are they poor, they call me a Communist."
- Hélder Pessoa Câmara, Archbishop of Olinda and Recife, Brazil

[RonNNN]

"Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
news:MWHaq.1305$xG.583@newsfe21.ams2...
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:23:21 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>
>>>> I think David Lipman and FTR will back *that* up. X-posted for Mr.
>>>> Lipman.
>>>
>>>As I said, I thank you for xposting this.
>>
>> YW
>>
>>>You aren't going to like the results I'm thinking, but I probably will
>>>enjoy it.
>>
>> We will see.
>>
>> For fun, let's ask each of them and everyone else who they would rather
>> meet and have a nice lunch with?
>>
>> Myself, who has never threatened anyone with the now infamous ".45"; or
>> you, a known sociopath who is hell bent on exposing RL information as a
>> sole means of retaliation (and some written death/assault threats
>> sprinkled in) against your detractors?
>>
>> I'd be more interested in the latter, who's up for lunch?
>
> I'd have lunch with both of you. Just for the opportunity to bang yer
> ****ing heads together.

In that case, invite Jenn too, and have a "free-for-all"! [g]

[Aardvark]

On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 06:52:19 -0500, RonNNN wrote:

> "Aardvark" <aardvark@youllnever.know> wrote in message
> news:MWHaq.1305$xG.583@newsfe21.ams2...
>> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:23:21 -0500, G. Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> Dustin wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I think David Lipman and FTR will back *that* up. X-posted for Mr.
>>>>> Lipman.
>>>>
>>>>As I said, I thank you for xposting this.
>>>
>>> YW
>>>
>>>>You aren't going to like the results I'm thinking, but I probably will
>>>>enjoy it.
>>>
>>> We will see.
>>>
>>> For fun, let's ask each of them and everyone else who they would
>>> rather meet and have a nice lunch with?
>>>
>>> Myself, who has never threatened anyone with the now infamous ".45";
>>> or you, a known sociopath who is hell bent on exposing RL information
>>> as a sole means of retaliation (and some written death/assault threats
>>> sprinkled in) against your detractors?
>>>
>>> I'd be more interested in the latter, who's up for lunch?
>>
>> I'd have lunch with both of you. Just for the opportunity to bang yer
>> ****ing heads together.
>
> In that case, invite Jenn too, and have a "free-for-all"! [g]

Now, *that's* an idea!



--
"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask
why are they poor, they call me a Communist."
- Hélder Pessoa Câmara, Archbishop of Olinda and Recife, Brazil

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:4c0m67h7e3meehs6f5um09vb0gpnab1p7m@Osama-is-dead.net:

> G. Morgan wrote:
>
>>>I hope you realise that.
>>
>>Mr. Lipman won't lie to me. We have bantered off and on for years.
>
>
> The only thing at issue for Mr. Lipman and FTR is if their intent
> was to "hand my ass to me".

Their intent? No. It's my belief reading the thread that you got your
ass handed to you. You implied I was doing blackhat things and working
with nambla.

They both responded and corrected you. To me, it seemed like you got
*****slapped with correct information countering your bogus information
and smartass remark. Atleast, that was my take on it. A full paragraph
explaining to you what I was talking about.

That's the 2nd time now you've tried to stray off topic. You originally
sought to question my technical expertise as you think I'm bull****ting
you.

You offered to have David Lipman and FTR give you their educated
opinions of me, as you have reason to trust them over me. Now, we both
know if either responds it's just going to confirm what I told you the
first time we corresponded (before this wiseass back and forth ****)
and that's not going to go well for you, obviously. Go well in the
sense that, well, I was telling the truth about my abilities and they
aren't questionable.

I'm a malware researcher, a retired Vxer, and yes, a Hacker. And it's
not a bad thing that i'm one of those people; it allows me an insight
and I feel, an advantage over some others when it comes to my
speciality; the analysis and study of malware. I wouldn't risk my
legitimate and known reputation as a malware researcher trying to bluff
you or anybody else here or anyplace else.

I'm well aware that i'm always under a microscope. Anything I release
is as well. BugHunter has been since 2005, and nothing malicious has
ever! been found inside it. It's done as I said it would do, and
nothing more. Same with me. I'm under consistent peer review, just as
it should be. level playing field this way. If I was out of line, I'd
be called on it.

I have a very clean record of malware diagnosis. I intend to keep it
that way.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.