Re: LoJack for Laptops

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:mpql67pmb0i8j5b7p4p1bmqnrs92lk3tjl@Osama-is-dead.net:

> Sounds judgmental to me. Judge, Jury, and Exe.. wait, he's innocent
> after all, doh!

Judgemental, sure. I'll go for that. Still, no lie. You were, ehh, wrong
on that accusation. Rather than just say, opps, ok, like I did, you'd
rather deflect and try to attack more. Likely due to your poor decision
to challenge on technical skill. You're really pissed off at me, eh?



--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.

[G. Morgan]

Dustin wrote:

>G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
>news:mpql67pmb0i8j5b7p4p1bmqnrs92lk3tjl@Osama-is-dead.net:
>
>> Sounds judgmental to me. Judge, Jury, and Exe.. wait, he's innocent
>> after all, doh!
>
>Judgemental, sure. I'll go for that. Still, no lie.

Nope, it was a lie.

>You were, ehh, wrong
>on that accusation. Rather than just say, opps, ok, like I did, you'd
>rather deflect and try to attack more.

Nope, it was a lie.

>Likely due to your poor decision
>to challenge on technical skill.

I don't remember any 'technical' challenge unsettled except for the BS
you are spewing about LoJack.

>You're really pissed off at me, eh?

Nope, you're just a hobby for me when I feel like talking ****.

[Dustin]

G. Morgan <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in
news:hdvl67l1lghv0dso8152elqg31eefvse0n@Osama-is-dead.net:

> you are spewing about LoJack.

I'm not spewing any BS about lojack. You can easily verify my claims,
some sites which are discussing lojack have also noticed the same
functionality.

An individual who goes by the name Ant examined a rom dump file some
time back and reached the same conclusions as I have.

You don't learn well, so I'll try to use simple english. I don't play
cards for one reason, I'm not a natural liar, so I stink at having to
bluff. basically, I give myself away; if I'm holding a hand that you
know is going to squish you like a bug, you'd be able to tell.

Plus, I don't like wasting time trying to remember stupid ****, so it's
just easier for me to be honest with an individual when I'm discussing
research openly like this. I'm obviously placing my reputation as a
professional malware researcher on the line when sharing what little I
have here with you.

I've done my homework, I know lojack intimately.

I've been sure to share material you can independently verify. For two
reasons. One, my reputation, I've worked my ass off to earn trust and
respect of other researchers. No easy task considering my confirmed
history as a retired Vxer who enjoyed irking the avers. I'll be damned
if I'd screw it up on a pissant nobody like you.

Two, I like to imagine the expression on a persons face when they see
the same results by another individual unrelated to me. I know it has
to increase their bloodpressure when they work so hard to discredit me.

Not only do they fail in the job, their actually further increase my
credibility to other newbies who aren't familiar with malware
researchers. In other words, When you ask me to prove little things
like this, thinking I can't, You're helping me in a good way. [g]

> Nope, you're just a hobby for me when I feel like talking ****.

Well, you seem to talk **** the majority of the time from where I'm
sitting. I think IT is more a hobby for you than it is for me, tho. I
do it for a living, professionally.


--
I am a sinner
Hold my prayers upto the sun
I am a sinner
Heaven's closed for what I've done.