-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

https://groups.google.com/group/alt....db2836dc?hl=es

or

http://preview.************/3vpp4ej

John Grahms/Raid/Dustin Cook Splits Hairs On Virus Passing On Internet

Dave U. Random
Grupos de noticias: alt.comp.anti-virus
De: Dave U. Random <anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
Fecha: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 0828 +0200 (CEST)
Local: Mart 8 jun 2010 01:27
Asunto: John Grahms/Raid/Dustin Cook Splits Hairs On Virus Passing On Internet
(Below is a post illustrating the total lack of responsibility felt by a
psychopath/sociopath. They will argue the most futile of points in the
loudest manner possible, as if their rage is the defining point of logic
in the argument. Read this idiocy as John Grahms/Raid/Dustin Cook
splits hairs into micron sections to evade responsibility for passing
viruses into the Internet. I'll say it again, if it were not for this
idiot from sophos, and others like him who should have known better, the
turd known as John Grahms/Raid/Dustin Cook would today be unknown, just
another two-bit virus writer/passer whom no one ever heard of, killfiled
by all; heard by none.)

(The wrapped URL if copy/pasted into the addy window of FireFox, will
unwrap itself and take you to the page.)

(Anon's note: the older url below is missing. Raid had it removed)

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...read/thread/40...

or

http://preview.************/28e65o9

Raid
View profile
More options Apr 23 2002, 7:45 am
Newsgroups: alt.comp.virus
From: raids...@yahoo.com (Raid)
Date: 22 Apr 2002 14:45:38 -0700
Local: Tues, Apr 23 2002 7:45 am
Subject: Re: Attn Jiz Condom

sop...@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote in message

<news:aa0koq$2tp$1@thorium.cix.co.uk>...

>Depends what you call spreading really doesn't it? I mean, I
>know of the Austrian headquarters of a large multinational
>organisation which got

No, actually it doesn't. Sophos and yourself (well, sophos with
your help really) told people I was maliciously spreading the
virus. Offering a virus on a virus oriented website is hardly
malicious spreading of said virus.

You do not differeiate this in your descriptions. This isn't
right, and it's misleading; ****ing intentional misleading.
Posting a virus on a virus website is not maliciously spreading
the virus into the wild; But you have made NO effort to
distinguish between the two. You'd rather people mistakenly
believe I posted the virus to the web in an effort to infect
persons.

>infected by it, and were less than happy. And I know that
>you've said before that you have made your virus binaries
>available for anyone to download from one of your websites "as
>long as they obey the disclaimer", and I know that you've said
>that you share viruses with your virus-writing

And none of this is malicious spreading Graham. None of it. I
did not spread the Toadie virus in any way shape or form; I
offered it on a ProVx website for others to examine. No
spreading by my part. Let's clear that up shall we? I asked you
for the proof you touted as having; I asked for the proof Sophos
touted as having. You *still* have not provided it.

I indeed question your integrity Graham, and those of your
employer.

>had been hit by Toadie whether it was from the cell cracking
>program that was posted on usenet, and I know that you have
>used the pseudonym John

you basically have nothing, no concrete evidence ever linking me
to the malicious spread of Toadie. Quiet the opposite of what
you were quoted as saying. "He is actively distributing it in
the form of a cell phone cloning application and an adult sex
crack". I want you to provide evidence to support this
outlandish and outright BULL**** claim you made on Sophos
behalf.

You can claim the reporters twisted your words all you like
Graham, but now it's time to put up that evidence you were going
to fork to the authorities. Time to say which authorities
contacted you about Toadie and myself (again, I maintain
according to FBI contacts I have, none were interested in me or
Toadie).

Yep, it's time to admit how much of a fat ****ing liar you
really are Graham ol pal. And Sophos long thought of as an
honest company; Woops. Not so honest are we gents?

>And I know that you posted in public on 13 January 2000
>announcing your plan to release the virus you wrote after
>Toadie (IrOk) in the wild:

Yep; and so? Irok isn't toadie. We're talking about Toadie
Graham, let's not try to defray from the attack. Laugh. I
realize you can't answer the questions I've asked you; but you
could atleast try. Your only going to dig a deeper hole for
yourself.

I will not let you ignore your lies Graham, I promise your lies
and the lies of Sophos (you do represent them) will not go
un-noticed. It's time you *******s became a little bit honest
for once.

>"In a few weeks, IrOk (which is based off of Toadie) is going
>to be completed. And I am going to lose it into the wild, on
>purpose. YOu can quote me on that one this time Graham."

That's great and all; But a person can change his/her opinion.
Which I did.

Unless you can provide this proof you long talked about in our
emails; then you will have to accept the fact that YOU AND
SOPHOS ARE LIARS.

Hard pill to swallow? Maybe you should "turn yourself in" for
lieing to reporters so much, before somebody at Sophos decides
to check into my posts for themselves, you fat prick.

Regards, Raid [slam]

- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: Raid Ver. 0.4.6 (Raid's I.Q)
Comment: RAID - Is A Dangerous Sociopathic Monster

mQGiBEv5rOcRBADxvuuWmXxws8jvtc4o1P6eD7yi0bROD2koLk O+3fdtGpSi54tT
UMqWJ0iOvs3oDUZsgQ+n4pkwrLCvgrC0rQzq85T3oS/6tzIdqboTj/hsIkwJrvsT
RfdrIORMRMrRUQXOcae4A+XVjHR7nYLlVhzfatZcZw0XaLGvdO qdwfYj3QCg/4+j
lnraPsboXfnmcpEFabBbxhkEAMUrYAjMzl3cWeFng+TdiAomsQ zmiXPnOG8dcB1v
OlXCIgNRaKfXM2deNSho11o5I/kYCVBBrpSl/4Ou3yt9HHx5tyMBadVD0lLaOWn4
bxjVPuIVTmJPOUd3X1IEBjmP2qBBdRU04lBIFuRokpIb2zZhnr kNX5LyrJB1k42I
qHT1BACXc/Dy2SFGX2NB29msCPczKGo4FvOS4G1kAacDnBKoIErwP6/MXHpcF4Gb
Mx1Eb4s9IR5Af4pGLdpsfl2MC3OSgeby56BxvTo1YLjnxxoeJn 55aRVRpzgrEFyN
kZqAnGAZjWbWHU3i1ag2vtDFkZnVp5fWKYH+29C7hsapeuMbAr QEUmFpZIkAUwQQ
EQIAEwUCS/ms5wkLCQoIAgcDAQQCGQEACgkQvmBTcC1T9/WQrwCfZFGckHXx4/J2
KbefJqHD0+NH7OsAmwQnmaYlPP/rZ1Gah0EyBz/zW0OnuQINBEv5rO4QCADjDEBs
uorjWyUdnKenrVyM9ovZhSGpfCsMW9+ydRYCTYCAzsH/p39H0aiGgfdDngtucK9V
xnmz5DmItw0WQBTCLEZQZ0iPBMu8eN0Kot/PQ9ckIYBeE1AFQyQUm1kB7WywstUc
p26cs5Mp0QcY7dVB0AbmnO6Bs46Ss/ClATMzISEESDd73A7Shgp009HMPOJFx6YP
RxHKLJrpRYGQrJZqb/35DuqIegP1WZYfV3kG6DhPApt7SXc9JgAxbyXoWruWEd+M
bo5d6E80w2trqTsXM2qrbahfPuJG4bzEWvO1Mx4IQCPIXqhIDk 9sPnwyTZrVYfEs
P6cGyk/x43ns9zqvAAICB/46rb6F+hK3UrQcXyVgw6pJYgta3Eb57lM87rcnwrbj
XWxupSy5efwYznG22kIjhe9ct6AbA699d56NFWU5gwbVowO8Ee S/LGeB2OOc9PaW
gfSae9/vVI0PakkMXSm+J1KjgWCK4j7PzAg/Si72QduQr4jwnA5B75/OS172jcBu
ZBnAbQ/hSFetBsk+037CKpvsPyGX5MQv5ZBSZV3qzFFmo+bgX1QbQxFrg qAV8jyw
2UlQ0zU7G5oX7H859T9MWaqtkjPZHP+v6vqDH5YIuAIo6NA2d7 UZwzB766zpJeSI
OxkjbvbaNUV+w7oiIR8f4iQnOiIGsqUXwybAAtSaFhyriQBGBB gRAgAGBQJL+azu
AAoJEL5gU3AtU/f1X1wAoOfSc12FoPilEN0W1LGFCt6IpOLLAJ9yvzq7gaqipUL+
szxmvxA3SS3HRg==
=CTpL
- -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Raid Ver. 0.4.6 (Raid's I.Q)
Comment: RAID - Is A Dangerous Sociopathic Monster

iQA/AwUBTisIr75gU3AtU/f1EQL7nwCghvQav8gYHckuB9T0RCi4/uCwjloAn3k1
t1RlYc7d4mJXoGZCWi99Uwcf
=Szaj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----