Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 104

Thread: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on Sex Chats

  1. #51
    David W. Hodgins Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on SexChats

    On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:50:54 -0400, Dustin <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:

    > Oh, and switching to linux still ****s you, when the optionrom2 calls
    > home on your internet connection and finds out she's stolen. Which it
    > will do, when it cannot drop the exe file. LOL. Whan happens next is a


    If it's using a windows executable, to phone home, that won't work.

    From
    http://blog.lojackforlaptops.com/201...-is-recovered/

    Kelly@Absolute says:
    July 7, 2011 at 9:02 pm
    LoJack would not work in a Linux environment.

    > bios lockdown. IE: no more booting till your system gets an internet
    > connection and an OK from them. The only way around is a hotswap bios
    > reflash then.


    Are you saying the option rom can establish an internet connection
    before the operating system boots?

    Regards, Dave Hodgins

    --
    Change nomail.afraid.org to ody.ca to reply by email.
    (nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
    use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)

  2. #52
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on Sex Chats

    From: "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org>

    > On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:50:54 -0400, Dustin <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >> Oh, and switching to linux still ****s you, when the optionrom2 calls
    >> home on your internet connection and finds out she's stolen. Which it
    >> will do, when it cannot drop the exe file. LOL. Whan happens next is a

    >
    > If it's using a windows executable, to phone home, that won't work.
    >
    > From
    > http://blog.lojackforlaptops.com/201...-is-recovered/
    >
    > Kelly@Absolute says:
    > July 7, 2011 at 9:02 pm
    > LoJack would not work in a Linux environment.
    >
    >> bios lockdown. IE: no more booting till your system gets an internet
    >> connection and an OK from them. The only way around is a hotswap bios
    >> reflash then.

    >
    > Are you saying the option rom can establish an internet connection
    > before the operating system boots?
    >


    Hmmmmm.....

    If it is embedded it may be possible. What if you install a different NIC ? There is NO
    WAY the any BIOS routine would be able to communicate with it.



    --
    Dave
    Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
    http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  3. #53
    David W. Hodgins Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on SexChats

    On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:41:57 -0400, David H. Lipman <DLipman~nospam~@verizon.net> wrote:

    > From: "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org>
    >> Are you saying the option rom can establish an internet connection
    >> before the operating system boots?


    > If it is embedded it may be possible. What if you install a different NIC ? There is NO
    > WAY the any BIOS routine would be able to communicate with it.


    It would have trouble with the password for my dsl access too.

    Regards, Dave Hodgins

    --
    Change nomail.afraid.org to ody.ca to reply by email.
    (nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
    use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)

  4. #54
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on Sex Chats

    David H. Lipman wrote:

    >From: "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org>
    >
    >> On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:50:54 -0400, Dustin <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>> Oh, and switching to linux still ****s you, when the optionrom2 calls
    >>> home on your internet connection and finds out she's stolen. Which it
    >>> will do, when it cannot drop the exe file. LOL. Whan happens next is a

    >>
    >> If it's using a windows executable, to phone home, that won't work.
    >>
    >> From
    >> http://blog.lojackforlaptops.com/201...-is-recovered/
    >>
    >> Kelly@Absolute says:
    >> July 7, 2011 at 9:02 pm
    >> LoJack would not work in a Linux environment.
    >>
    >>> bios lockdown. IE: no more booting till your system gets an internet
    >>> connection and an OK from them. The only way around is a hotswap bios
    >>> reflash then.

    >>
    >> Are you saying the option rom can establish an internet connection
    >> before the operating system boots?
    >>

    >
    >Hmmmmm.....
    >
    >If it is embedded it may be possible. What if you install a different NIC ? There is NO
    >WAY the any BIOS routine would be able to communicate with it.


    Unless it refuses to give an IRQ to any device in the FCC database that
    is a NIC.




  5. #55
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on Sex Chats

    From: "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org>

    > On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:41:57 -0400, David H. Lipman <DLipman~nospam~@verizon.net> wrote:
    >
    >> From: "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org>
    >>> Are you saying the option rom can establish an internet connection
    >>> before the operating system boots?

    >
    >> If it is embedded it may be possible. What if you install a different NIC ? There is
    >> NO
    >> WAY the any BIOS routine would be able to communicate with it.

    >
    > It would have trouble with the password for my dsl access too.
    >
    > Regards, Dave Hodgins
    >


    PPoE authentication.



    --
    Dave
    Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
    http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  6. #56
    David H. Lipman Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on Sex Chats

    From: "G. Morgan" <G_Morgan@easy.com>

    >>
    >> Hmmmmm.....
    >>
    >> If it is embedded it may be possible. What if you install a different NIC ? There is
    >> NO
    >> WAY the any BIOS routine would be able to communicate with it.

    >
    > Unless it refuses to give an IRQ to any device in the FCC database that
    > is a NIC.
    >
    >


    ???


    --
    Dave
    Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
    http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



  7. #57
    Peter Foldes Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on Sex Chats

    "G. Morgan" <G_Morgan@easy.com> wrote in message
    news:0c53671k4a0mlnmfmea9gvrgj71vfu2etk@Osama-is-dead.net...
    > David H. Lipman wrote:



    > Unless it refuses to give an IRQ to any device in the FCC database that
    > is a NIC.
    >



    What are you saying with the above Morgan. Makes no sense here

    JS



  8. #58
    G. Morgan Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on Sex Chats

    David H. Lipman wrote:

    >From: "G. Morgan" <G_Morgan@easy.com>
    >
    >>>
    >>> Hmmmmm.....
    >>>
    >>> If it is embedded it may be possible. What if you install a different NIC ? There is
    >>> NO
    >>> WAY the any BIOS routine would be able to communicate with it.

    >>
    >> Unless it refuses to give an IRQ to any device in the FCC database that
    >> is a NIC.
    >>
    >>

    >
    >???


    I was actually thinking of the PCI database. But the FCC has one too on
    NIC's.

    http://www.pcidatabase.com/search.ph...ice_search.y=0

    Wouldn't LoJack be able to recognize a NIC in this manner and still work
    on Linux?







  9. #59
    Dustin Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on Sex Chats

    "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
    newsp.v07k0xqda3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net:

    > On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:50:54 -0400, Dustin
    > <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >> Oh, and switching to linux still ****s you, when the optionrom2
    >> calls home on your internet connection and finds out she's stolen.
    >> Which it will do, when it cannot drop the exe file. LOL. Whan
    >> happens next is a

    >
    > If it's using a windows executable, to phone home, that won't work.


    You seem to be missing something important. It can use the windows
    executable, but in the event it cannot drop it in a specified amount of
    time, it halts the boot process.

    > Are you saying the option rom can establish an internet connection
    > before the operating system boots?


    I'm not only saying that, but, being as I've extracted a viable sample of
    the option rom and have since learned how to remove it, I *know* the
    company is lying about the products limitations and abilities.


    --
    I am a sinner
    Hold my prayers upto the sun
    I am a sinner
    Heaven's closed for what I've done.

  10. #60
    Dustin Guest

    Re: Couple Can Sue Laptop-Tracking Company (LoJack) for Spying on Sex Chats

    "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in
    news:j3s0lh01k3i@news3.newsguy.com:

    > From: "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org>
    >
    >> On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:50:54 -0400, Dustin
    >> <bughunter.dustin@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>> Oh, and switching to linux still ****s you, when the optionrom2
    >>> calls home on your internet connection and finds out she's stolen.
    >>> Which it will do, when it cannot drop the exe file. LOL. Whan
    >>> happens next is a

    >>
    >> If it's using a windows executable, to phone home, that won't work.
    >>
    >> From
    >> http://blog.lojackforlaptops.com/201...ays—laptop-wit
    >> h-wiped-drive-is-recovered/
    >>
    >> Kelly@Absolute says:
    >> July 7, 2011 at 9:02 pm
    >> LoJack would not work in a Linux environment.
    >>
    >>> bios lockdown. IE: no more booting till your system gets an
    >>> internet connection and an OK from them. The only way around is a
    >>> hotswap bios reflash then.

    >>
    >> Are you saying the option rom can establish an internet connection
    >> before the operating system boots?
    >>

    >
    > Hmmmmm.....
    >
    > If it is embedded it may be possible. What if you install a
    > different NIC ? There is NO WAY the any BIOS routine would be able
    > to communicate with it.


    You forget something important. The laptop has a NIC already built in,
    the bios has remote control over it. Always has. Lojacked laptop isn't
    going to use a nic you provide. [g]


    --
    I am a sinner
    Hold my prayers upto the sun
    I am a sinner
    Heaven's closed for what I've done.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •